Stem Cells http://www.peprotech.com/
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Almici, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzoli, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Almici, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rizzoli, V.

Stem Cells, Vol 13, 533-540, Copyright © 1995 by AlphaMed Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Density separation of umbilical cord blood and recovery of hemopoietic progenitor cells: implications for cord blood banking

C Almici, C Carlo-Stella, L Mangoni, D Garau, L Cottafavi, A Ventura, M Armanetti, JE Wagner and V Rizzoli
Department of Hematology, University of Parma, Italy.

Umbilical cord blood (CB) has been evaluated as a potential source of hematopoietic stem cells suitable for clinical use in the transplantation setting. Previous reports have documented a significant loss of progenitor cells by any manipulation other than cryopreservation. We have evaluated the feasibility of fractionating and cryopreserving CB samples with minimal loss of progenitor cells. We have compared various separation procedures based on different density gradients in the attempt to obtain the highest depletion of red blood cells (RBC) while maintaining the highest recovery of progenitor cells. We compared three different densities of Percoll (1.069 g/ml, 1.077 g/ml, 1.084 g/ml), sedimentation over poligeline (Emagel ) and sedimentation over poligeline followed by separation over Ficoll/Hypaque (F/H). Separated samples (n = 25) were analyzed for recovery of CD34+ cells and progenitor cells (CFU-GEMM, BFU-E, CFU-GM). Separation by sedimentation over poligeline followed by F/H allowed the highest depletion of RBC (hematocrit of the final cellular suspension 0.4 +/- 0.1%) while maintaining high recovery of CD34+ cells (85.3 +/- 5.6%) and total recovery for CFU-GEMM, BFU-E and CFU-GM. After cryopreservation, recovery of clonogenic progenitors was 82% for CFU- GEMM, 94% for BFU-E, 82% for CFU-GM and 90% for colony-forming units (CFUs) after five weeks of long-term culture (LTC). We further evaluated the effect of stem cell factor (SCF) on the in vitro growth of hemopoietic progenitors and on replating efficiency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS
http://www.peprotech.com/
Copyright © 1995 by AlphaMed Press.