|
|
||||||||
RAPID COMMUNICATION |
a Center for Light Microscope Imaging and Biotechnology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA;
b Institute for Cellular Therapeutics, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA;
c Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA;
d Present address: Frankel Laboratory of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Center of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel
Key Words. Bone marrow cells • Hemopoietic stem cells • Bone marrow • Seeding • Adhesion • Antigen barriers
Nadir Askenasy, Ph.D., Frankel Laboratory of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Center of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 14 Kaplan Street, Petach Tikva, 49202, Israel. Telephone: 9-723-925-3669; Fax: 9-723-925-3042; e-mail: anadir{at}012.net.il
In this study, optical techniques were used to characterize adhesion of hematopoietic cells to bone marrow (BM) stromal microenvironment in situ. Bone marrow cells (BMC) labeled with PKH membrane linkers were infused into nonconditioned femurs and were monitored by fluorescence microscopy through an optical bone window. Repeated infusions of BMC into the femoral lumen resulted in a progressive increase in the number of adherent cells (p < 0.01), indicating that the availability of hemopoietic niches in the nonconditioned BM was not a rate-limiting factor of early BMC seeding. Adhesion of hemopoietic progenitor and stem cells (HSPC) was 30-fold higher than lineage+ BMC (p < 0.001), suggesting that adhesion molecules on the surface of HSPC have a higher propensity for adhesion. BMC antigen-matched to and disparate from BM stroma adhered at equal rates, opposing the idea of involvement of antigen barriers during early seeding. It is concluded that primary adhesion to BM stromal microenvironment is favorable for HSPC and is not restricted by antigenic barriers or availability of vacant niches.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Lapidot, A. Dar, and O. Kollet How do stem cells find their way home? Blood, September 15, 2005; 106(6): 1901 - 1910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Askenasy, E. S. Yoleuk, H. Shirwan, Z. Wang, and D. L. Farkas Cardiac Allograft Acceptance after Localized Bone Marrow Transplantation by Isolated Limb Perfusion in Nonmyeloablated Recipients Stem Cells, March 1, 2003; 21(2): 200 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Askenasy and D. L. Farkas Optical Imaging of PKH-Labeled Hematopoietic Cells in Recipient Bone Marrow In Vivo Stem Cells, November 1, 2002; 20(6): 501 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Askenasy, T. Zorina, D. L. Farkas, and I. Shalit Transplanted Hematopoietic Cells Seed in Clusters in Recipient Bone Marrow In Vivo Stem Cells, July 1, 2002; 20(4): 301 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Askenasy Localized Bone Marrow Transplantation Leads to Skin Allograft Acceptance in Nonmyeloablated Recipients: Comparison of Intra-Bone Marrow and Isolated Limb Perfusion Stem Cells, January 1, 2002; 20(1): 86 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| STEM CELLS | THE ONCOLOGIST | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |
