|
|
||||||||
CONCISE REVIEW |
a Department of Medicine,
b Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA;
c Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, England
Key Words. Chimeraplasty • Gene repair • Chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotide • Single-stranded oligonucleotide • Triplex-forming oligonucleotide • Small fragment homologous replacement • Sleeping Beauty transposon system
Correspondence:
Clifford J. Steer, M.D., Department of Medicine, Mayo Mail Code 36, Mayo Building, Room A536, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Telephone: 612-624-6648; Fax: 612-625-5620; e-mail: steer001{at}tc.umn.edu
The main strategy of gene therapy has traditionally been focused on gene augmentation. This approach typically involves the introduction of an expression system designed to express a specific protein in the transfected cell. Both the basic and clinical sciences have generated enough information to suggest that gene therapy would eventually alter the fundamental practice of modern medicine. However, despite progress in the field, widespread clinical applications and success have not been achieved. The myriad deficiencies associated with gene augmentation have resulted in the development of alternative approaches to treat inherited and acquired genetic disorders. One, derived primarily from the pioneering work of homologous recombination, is gene repair. Simply stated, the process involves targeting the mutation in situ for gene correction and a return to normal gene function.
Site-specific genetic repair has many advantages over augmentation although it too is associated with significant limitations. This review outlines the advantages and disadvantages of gene correction. In particular, we discuss technologies based on chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides, single-stranded and triplex-forming oligonucleotides, and small fragment homologous replacement. While each of these approaches is different, they all share a number of common characteristics, including the need for efficient delivery of nucleic acids to the nucleus. In addition, we review the potential application of a novel and exciting nonviral gene augmentation strategythe Sleeping Beauty transposon system.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Kamiya, M. Uchiyama, Y. Nakatsu, T. Tsuzuki, and H. Harashima Effects of Target Sequence and Sense versus Anti-sense Strands on Gene Correction with Single-stranded DNA Fragments J. Biochem., October 1, 2008; 144(4): 431 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ikeda, C. Kokubu, K. Yusa, V. W. Keng, K. Horie, and J. Takeda Sleeping Beauty Transposase Has an Affinity for Heterochromatin Conformation Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2007; 27(5): 1665 - 1676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yang, L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and H. H. Kazazian Jr An important role for RUNX3 in human L1 transcription and retrotransposition Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2003; 31(16): 4929 - 4940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Igoucheva, V. Alexeev, M. Pryce, and K. Yoon Transcription affects formation and processing of intermediates in oligonucleotide-mediated gene alteration Nucleic Acids Res., May 15, 2003; 31(10): 2659 - 2670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| STEM CELLS | THE ONCOLOGIST | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |