Stem Cells http://www.stemcellsportal.com/
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online August 30, 2007
Stem Cells Vol. 25 No. 12 December 2007, pp. 3026 -3028
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0511; www.StemCells.com
© 2007 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2007-0511v1
25/12/3026    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Triller Vrtovec, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vrtovec, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Triller Vrtovec, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vrtovec, B.

EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS

Commentary: Is Totipotency of a Human Cell a Sufficient Reason to Exclude Its Patentability Under the European Law?

Katja Triller Vrtoveca, Bojan Vrtovecb

aMax Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, München, Germany;
bLjubljana University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Key Words. Embryonic stem cells • Totipotent stem cells • Patents • Bioethics

Correspondence: Katja Triller Vrtovec, B.L., LL.M., Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, Marstallstraβe 8, D-80539 München, Germany. Telephone: +386 41 38 88 27; Fax: +386 13 65 49 75; e-mail: katja.triller{at}gmail.com

Received June 29, 2007; accepted for publication August 21, 2007.
First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS   August 30, 2007.



This article argues that totipotent character of human totipotent cells—defined as the capacity of a cell "to differentiate into all somatic lineages (ectoderm, mesoderm, endoderm), the germ line and extra-embryonic tissues such as the placenta"—is not a sufficient reason to exclude their patentability on the basis of Article 5(1) of the Directive 98/44/EC on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions (Biopatent Directive), which maintains that "the human body, at the various stages of its formation and development, [...] cannot constitute patentable inventions." Since human totipotent cells have both the potential to generate an entire new organism or to generate only different tissues or organs of an organism, they simultaneously fit the definition of the unpatentable human body at the earliest stage of its formation as well as of an element of the human body, which "may constitute a patentable invention" pursuant to Article 5(2) of the Biopatent Directive, whether that element is isolated from the human body or otherwise produced by means of a technical process. Therefore, this article suggests that, when evaluating patentability of human totipotent cells, they should be further evaluated according to their location and their method of derivation (i.e., whether human totipotent cells are located in the human body, whether they are isolated from the human body, or whether they are produced otherwise by means of a technical process).

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
H.-W. Denker
Totipotency/Pluripotency and Patentability
Stem Cells, June 1, 2008; 26(6): 1656 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS
http://www.stemcellsportal.com/
Copyright © 2007 by AlphaMed Press.