|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS |
aCancer Biology Program and
bDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Key Words. Stem cells • Chromatin • Histone • Methylation • Acetylation
Correspondence: Michael K. Fritsch, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 5250 MSC, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. Telephone: 608-263-5351; Fax: 608-265-3301; e-mail: mkfritsch{at}wisc.edu
Received on March 22, 2007;
accepted for publication on May 18, 2007.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS May 24, 2007.
Histone modifications play a crucial role during embryonic stem (ES) cell differentiation. During differentiation, binding of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which mediates trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (K27me3), is lost on developmental genes that are transcriptionally induced. We observed a global decrease in K27me3 in as little as 3 days after differentiation of mouse ES cells induced by retinoic acid (RA) treatment. The global levels of the histone K27 methyltransferase EZH2 also decreased with RA treatment. A loss of EZH2 binding and K27me3 was observed locally on PRC2 target genes induced after 3 days of RA, including Nestin. In contrast, direct RA-responsive genes that are rapidly induced, such as Hoxa1, showed a loss of EZH2 binding and K27me3 after only a few hours of RA treatment. Following differentiation induced by leukemia inhibitor factor (LIF) withdrawal without RA, Hoxa1 was not transcriptionally activated. Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of EZH2 resulted in loss of K27me3 during LIF withdrawal, but the Hoxa1 gene remained transcriptionally silent after loss of this repressive mark. Induction of histone hyperacetylation overrode the repressive K27me3 modification and resulted in Hoxa1 gene expression. Together, these data show that there are multiple temporal phases of derepression of PRC2 target genes during ES cell differentiation and that other epigenetic marks (specifically, increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4), in addition to derepression, are important for gene-specific transcriptional activation. This report demonstrates the temporal interplay of various epigenetic changes in regulating gene expression during early ES cell differentiation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Tang, F. Chen, Q. Tan, S. Tan, L. Liu, and F. Zhang Regulation of CD11b transcription by decreasing PRC2 and increased acH4 level during ATRA-induced HL-60 differentiation Acta Biochim Biophys Sin, July 1, 2009; 41(7): 588 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Friedman, G. Liang, C.-C. Liu, E. M. Wolff, Y. C. Tsai, W. Ye, X. Zhou, and P. A. Jones The Putative Tumor Suppressor microRNA-101 Modulates the Cancer Epigenome by Repressing the Polycomb Group Protein EZH2 Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 69(6): 2623 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tzatsos, R. Pfau, S. C. Kampranis, and P. N. Tsichlis Ndy1/KDM2B immortalizes mouse embryonic fibroblasts by repressing the Ink4a/Arf locus PNAS, February 24, 2009; 106(8): 2641 - 2646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Latos, S. H. Stricker, L. Steenpass, F. M. Pauler, R. Huang, B. H. Senergin, K. Regha, M. V. Koerner, K. E. Warczok, C. Unger, et al. An in vitro ES cell imprinting model shows that imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene arises from an allele-specific expression bias Development, February 1, 2009; 136(3): 437 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| STEM CELLS | THE ONCOLOGIST | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |