HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2008-0634v1 26/11/2964    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints/Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sotiropoulou, P. A. Articles by Blanpain, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sotiropoulou, P. A. Articles by Blanpain, C.

TISSUE-SPECIFIC STEM CELLS

The Majority of Multipotent Epidermal Stem Cells Do Not Protect Their Genome by Asymmetrical Chromosome Segregation

Université Libre de Bruxelles, Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Brussels, Belgium

Key Words. Stem cells • Cell division • Chromosome segregation • Cancer

Correspondence: Correspondence: Cedric Blanpain, M.D., Ph.D., Université Libre de Bruxelles, IRIBHM, 808, Route de Lennik, Brussels 1070, Belgium. Telephone: +32-2-5554175; Fax: +32-2-5554655; e-mail: Cedric.Blanpain{at}ulb.ac.be; http://blanpainlab.ulb.ac.be/index.htm

Received on July 4, 2008; accepted for publication on August 23, 2008.

First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS  September 4, 2008.

The maintenance of genome integrity in stem cells (SCs) is critical for preventing cancer formation and cellular senescence. The immortal strand hypothesis postulates that SCs protect their genome by keeping the same DNA strand throughout life by asymmetrical cell divisions, thus avoiding accumulation of mutations that can arise during DNA replication. The in vivo relevance of this model remains to date a matter of intense debate. In this study, we revisited this long-standing hypothesis, by analyzing how multipotent hair follicle (HF) SCs segregate their DNA strands during morphogenesis, skin homeostasis, and SC activation. We used three different in vivo approaches to determine how HF SCs segregate their DNA strand during cell divisions. Double-labeling studies using pulse-chase experiments during morphogenesis and the first adult hair cycle showed that HF SCs incorporate two different nucleotide analogs, contradictory to the immortal strand hypothesis. The co-segregation of DNA and chromatin labeling during pulse-chase experiments demonstrated that label retention in HF SCs is rather a mark of relative quiescence. Moreover, DNA labeling of adult SCs, similar to labeling during morphogenesis, also resulted in label retention in HF SCs, indicating that chromosome segregation occurs randomly in most of these cells. Altogether, our results demonstrate that DNA strand segregation occurs randomly in the majority of HF SCs during development, tissue homeostasis, and following SC activation.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.