Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online June 26, 2008
Stem Cells Vol. 26 No. 9 September 2008, pp. 2300 -2310
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2008-0183; www.StemCells.com
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2008-0183v1
2008-0183v2
26/9/2300    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauwens, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zandstra, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauwens, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zandstra, P. W.

THE STEM CELL NICHE

Control of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Colony and Aggregate Size Heterogeneity Influences Differentiation Trajectories

Céline Liu Bauwensa,b, Raheem Peerania,b, Sylvia Niebrueggeb, Kimberly A. Woodhousea, Eugenia Kumachevaac, Mansoor Husaind,e, Peter W. Zandstraa,b,e

aDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry,
bInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering,
cDepartment of Chemistry,
dDepartment of Medicine, and
eMcEwen Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University Health Network and Heart & Stroke Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Key Words. Human pluripotent cells • Embryoid bodies • Embryoid body size • Cardiac induction • Micropatterning • Endogenous lineage specification • Differentiation mechanisms

Correspondence: Correspondence: Peter W. Zandstra, Ph.D., Terence Donnelly CCBR, 160 College Street, Office 1116, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G9. Telephone: 416-978-8888; Fax: 416-978-2666; e-mail: peter.zandstra{at}utoronto.ca

Received on February 26, 2008; accepted for publication on June 19, 2008.

First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS  June 26, 2008.


To better understand endogenous parameters that influence pluripotent cell differentiation we used human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) as a model system. We demonstrate that differentiation trajectories in aggregate (embryoid body [EB])-induced differentiation, a common approach to mimic some of the spatial and temporal aspects of in vivo development, are affected by three factors: input hESC composition, input hESC colony size, and EB size. Using a microcontact printing approach, size-specified hESC colonies were formed by plating single-cell suspensions onto micropatterned (MP) extracellular matrix islands. Subsequently, size-controlled EBs were formed by transferring entire colonies into suspension culture enabling the independent investigation of colony and aggregate size effects on differentiation induction. Gene and protein expression analysis of MP-hESC populations revealed that the ratio of Gata6 (endoderm-associated marker) to Pax6 (neural-associated marker) expression increased with decreasing colony size. Moreover, upon forming EBs from these MP-hESCs, we observed that differentiation trajectories were affected by both colony and EB size-influenced parameters. In MP-EBs generated from endoderm-biased (high Gata6/Pax6) input hESCs, higher mesoderm and cardiac induction was observed at larger EB sizes. Conversely, neural-biased (low Gata6/Pax6) input hESCs generated MP-EBs that exhibited higher cardiac induction in smaller EBs. Our analysis demonstrates that heterogeneity in hESC colony and aggregate size, typical in most differentiation strategies, produces subsets of appropriate conditions for differentiation into specific cell types. Moreover, our findings suggest that the local microenvironment modulates endogenous parameters that can be used to influence pluripotent cell differentiation trajectories.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
S.A. Hacking and A. Khademhosseini
Applications of Microscale Technologies for Regenerative Dentistry
Journal of Dental Research, May 1, 2009; 88(5): 409 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by AlphaMed Press.