Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gasson, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gasson, J. C.
Stem Cells, Vol. 17, No. 3, 162-171, May 1999
© 1999 AlphaMed Press

The Notch/Jagged Pathway Inhibits Proliferation of Human Hematopoietic Progenitors In Vitro

Liberty Walkera,*, Maureen Lyncha,*, Sheryl Silvermana, John Frasera, Jim Boulterb, Gerry Weinmasterc, Judith C. Gassona,c

a Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA;
b Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA;
c Department of Biological Chemistry, Molecular Biology Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Key Words. Jagged1 • Notch • Hematopoiesis • Stem cell factor • CD34+ cells

Dr. Judith C. Gasson, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 8-684 Factor, Box 951781, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1781, USA.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The cell surface receptor Notch1 is expressed on CD34+ hematopoietic precursors, whereas one of its ligands, Jagged1, is expressed on bone marrow stromal cells. To examine the role of Notch signaling in early hematopoiesis, human CD34+ cells were cultured in the presence or absence of exogenous cytokines on feeder layers that either did or did not express Jagged1. In the absence of recombinant growth factors, Jagged1 decreased myeloid colony formation by CD34+ cells, as well as 3H-thymidine incorporation and entry into S phase. In the presence of a strong cytokine signal to proliferate and mature, (interleukin 3 [IL-3] and IL-6, stem cell factor [SCF], and G-CSF), Jagged1 did not significantly alter either the fold expansion or the types of colonies formed by CD34+ cells. However, in the presence of SCF alone, Jagged1 increased erythroid colony formation twofold. These results demonstrate that Notch can modulate a growth factor signal, and that in the absence of growth factor stimulation, the Jagged1-Notch pathway preserves CD34+ cells in an immature state.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hematopoiesis involves a tightly regulated series of molecular events, whereupon lineage commitment and maturation correlate with a gradual reduction in proliferative potential. Homeostatic regulation of mature blood cell production, as well as response to injury or illness, is regulated by a group of glycoprotein cytokines that have been characterized over the past decade. Considerable interest is currently focused on the earliest events regulating the self-renewal or differentiation of the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) [1, 2]. Contact between the HSC and the bone marrow stroma is vital to stem cell survival and differentiation [3, 4], and elucidation of the cell-cell interactions involved is of critical importance.

Lineage commitment or self-renewal of a quiescent stem cell may result from intrinsic stochastic processes, after which the presence of appropriate cytokines allows the survival and/or proliferation of particular daughter cells. On the other hand, HSC may be instructed to adopt a particular fate by the binding of specific extracellular ligands. Current models include a role for both intrinsic and extrinsic processes in governing stem cell proliferation and maturation [1, 2].

In recent years, numerous soluble growth factors have been characterized as the molecular effectors of hematopoietic maturation. The effects of colony-stimulating factors, known for their ability to stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of committed progenitors, can be synergistically enhanced by interleukins (IL) such as IL-1, IL-4, and IL-6, as well as stem cell factor (SCF) and Flt3 ligand [5]. The latter are also known for their ability to enhance stem cell survival [5], but cell-cell interactions between HSC and the bone marrow stroma are also necessary [3, 4]. In vivo, stem cells adhere tightly to bone marrow stroma and, in vitro, stromal cell contact is required for stem cell maintenance in long-term bone marrow cultures [4]. A candidate molecule that may be involved in such interactions is the Notch receptor. Notch is thought to play a central role in development by regulating numerous types of cell fate decisions [6]. While in some instances the Notch signal may be instructive [7, 8], more commonly it has been shown to modulate responses to cell type-specification cues [6, 9], often rendering progenitors resistant to differentiation [10-19].

Members of the Notch receptor family and their ligands encode cell surface proteins whose extracellular domains include a series of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats that have been highly conserved throughout evolution and are widely expressed early in development [6, 9, 20]. First identified in Drosophila and C. elegans, Notch homologs have now been found in vertebrate species [9, 21] and four Notch isoforms (Notch1-4) have been isolated from mammals [20]. The Notch ligands fall into two classes based on the prototype Serrate and Delta ligands first identified in Drosophila. In mammals, two Delta-like molecules (Delta1 and Delta3) [22, 23] and two Serrate-like molecules (Jagged1 and Jagged2) have been identified [13, 14, 24-26]. Little is currently known about the specificity of the various Notch receptors for each ligand [27], although it has been shown that Jagged1 and Jagged2 can activate Notch1 in C2C12 myoblasts [13, 14].

A role for the Notch receptor and its ligands in hematopoiesis is emerging. Notch family members have been found in many blood cell types, including developing T cells [28, 29], B cells [30], and myeloblasts [10, 12]. Notch has also been identified in both murine [31] and human [32] hematopoietic precursors, including the immature subset that lacks expression of antigens associated with commitment to individual lineages [31]. To complement these observations, several investigators have looked for Notch ligands in bone marrow stroma, which provides the microenvironment necessary for the early development of all hematopoietic lineages. Jagged1 has now been identified in both human and murine bone marrow stroma [11, 31, 33].

Recently, roles for Notch signaling in lymphopoiesis and myelopoiesis have been identified. Activated forms of Notch expressed in the thymus of transgenic mice have been shown to affect commitment to the CD4, CD8 [7], and {alpha}ß, {gamma}{delta} [8] lineages. Signaling through the Notch receptor has been shown to inhibit granulocytic differentiation of the murine myeloblast 32D cell line [10-12] and to promote the in vitro survival of primitive precursor populations from normal murine bone marrow [31] and murine fetal liver [33]. We hypothesize that interactions between human Notch receptors and their ligands may influence the complex array of soluble and matrix-bound signals that regulate lineage commitment and maturation of human hematopoietic cells. To test this hypothesis, CD34+ cells were co-cultured in the presence or absence of recombinant cytokines on feeder layers that either did or did not express the Notch ligand, Jagged1. Our results demonstrate that Notch signaling can act as a modulator of the SCF signal, and that in the absence of recombinant growth factors, the Jagged1-Notch pathway acts to preserve CD34+ cells in an immature state. These results support a role for Notch signaling in the bone marrow microenvironment and the earliest events in stem cell commitment.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generation of Jagged1-Specific Antibody and Western Analysis
A Jagged1 glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein encoding the intracellular amino acids 1101-1221 of rat Jagged1 [13] was generated and purified using Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ) protocols. Polyclonal serum J59, which is specific for the entire Jagged1 intracellular domain, was derived from rabbits after immunization with purified GST-Jagged1 fusion proteins according to standard procedures.

To detect Jagged1 protein in cell lysates, 105 cells per lane in reducing sample buffer were fractionated on a 7.5% polyacrylamide mini-gel (BioRad; Hercules, CA). Separated proteins were transferred to Hybond nitrocellulose (Amersham; Arlington Heights, IL). Membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 1% Tween, prior to incubation for 2 h at room temperature with a 1:2,000 dilution of J59 rabbit antiserum. Immunoreactivity was detected using a biotinylated donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Amersham), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Amersham), and enhanced chemiluminescence Western blot reagents (Amersham) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Films (ECL Hyperfilm, Amersham) were scanned and reproduced for publication using Photoshop (Adobe Systems).

RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
Primary human stromal cultures were established from a normal donor. mRNA was harvested from 7 x 106 cells using Fast Track kit poly A+ mRNA isolation (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA). This mRNA was used as a template for subsequent RT-PCR reactions. Degenerate PCR primers based on homologies between rat and Drosophila amino acid sequences were used to amplify a 660-nucleotide (nt) cDNA fragment of the human Jagged EGF repeat region (amino acids 409-629). The purified product was then random prime-labeled (Prime-It II Kit, Stratagene; San Diego, CA) with 32P-dCTP (Amersham) for use as a cDNA library screen probe.

Library Screening
A cDNA library was prepared using mRNA from normal human stroma, which was oligo dT-primed and then directionally cloned into EcoRI-XhoI-digested {lambda}ZapII phage (Stratagene). The 660-nt EGF repeat PCR product was used as a probe to screen this library. The screen resulted in the independent isolation of two human Jagged1 clones, each approximately 4,000 nt in length, spanning from approximately 1,500 nt upstream of the gene's 5' end to the poly A+ tail at the 3' end.

Isolation of CD34+ Cells
After obtaining informed consent, human bone marrow samples from breast cancer patients, normal donors, or autologous bone marrow donors were placed in preservative-free heparin. The marrow was diluted 1:3 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and mononuclear cells were isolated by gradient centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia Biotech), followed by two washes with PBS. CD34+ cells were purified using Miltenyi Mini Macs separation columns and a CD34 isolation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotech; Auburn, CA). Typically, cell preparations were 95% CD34+, as shown by FACS analysis.

Flow Cytometric Staining of CD34+ Cells for Notch1
Freshly prepared CD34+ cells were washed in PBS, gently fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, then permeabilized in 70% EtOH for 10 min at 4°C. After two PBS washes, cells were resuspended in PBS pH 7.2 containing 5 mM EDTA and 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma; St. Louis, MO). Cells were allowed to rehydrate for 30 min at 37°C. Cells (106) were then blocked with normal human IgG (Miltenyi Biotech) for 10 min at room temperature and stained for 30 min with 0.4 µg of affinity-purified 93-4 rabbit antiserum [15] to the intracellular domain of rat Notch1 or with 0.4 µg of normal rabbit IgG (Sigma). Cells were then stained for 15 min with a 1:100 dilution of human-absorbed flourescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Caltag; Burlingame, CA). Cells were washed and analyzed immediately on a FACScan flow cytometer using Cell Quest software (Becton-Dickinson; Mountain View, CA).

Transfection and Viral Transduction of Feeder Layers
The C2C12 mouse myoblast cell line (ATCC #1772-CRL) was transfected with full-length rat Jagged1 cDNA sequence [13] cloned in the mammalian expression vector, pEF1{alpha}-BOS [34], along with the neomycin resistance gene to allow for selection of stable Jagged1-expressing cell lines. Stable lines were selected with 0.4 mg/ml Geneticin (G418, Life Technologies; Grand Island, NY), as previously described [15]. The full-length rat Jagged1 sequence tagged with HA [13] was cloned into the retroviral expression vector, {psi}E SR{alpha}MSVtKNeo (generously provided by Owen Witte, UCLA). The construct was used to make ecotropic retrovirus, which was used to transduce the S17 murine stromal cell line (established by the laboratory of Dr. Kenneth Dorshkind, UCLA), and the NIH 3T3 murine embryo cell line (ATTC #1658-CRL). Nearly confluent cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 2 h (S17) or overnight (NIH 3T3) in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Omega Scientific; Tarzana, CA), 10 µg/ml hexadimethrine bromide (Sigma), and the viral supernatant. The cells were then washed twice with PBS and incubated in fresh medium for two days before being selected and maintained on 0.2 mg/ml (S17) or 0.3 mg/ml (NIH 3T3) Geneticin (G418, Life Technologies).

Co-Culture and Harvest of CD34+ Progenitors with or without Jagged1
Feeder layers (S17, C2C12, or NIH-3T3 cells) expressing either Jagged1 or vector sequence were irradiated with 2,000 rads (60Co or 137Cs). The resulting cell monolayers were 70%-100% confluent within 24 h, at which time CD34+ cells were added. The co-cultures were maintained in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM), 20% FBS (Atlanta Biological; Norcross, GA), 50 ng/ml gentamicin, and 0.4 mM added L-glutamine. In some experiments the culture medium was supplemented with either a four factor cocktail consisting of IL-3 (50 ng/ml), IL-6 (50 ng/ml), SCF (50 ng/ml), and G-CSF (50 ng/ml), or with SCF alone (50 ng/ml) (generously provided by Amgen; Thousand Oaks, CA).

After three to eight days, hematopoietic cells were harvested. Culture medium and unattached cells were removed from each culture and placed in a fresh culture dish. The remaining cells were washed one to two times with PBS to harvest more tightly bound hematopoietic cells. Versene (0.02% EDTA, Irvine Scientific; Santa Ana, CA) was added to the remaining monolayer of cells, and after 5-15 min, the cultures were disrupted by vigorous pipetting and scraping. All cell supensions were pooled and pelleted. Cell pellets were resuspended in growth medium and added to the culture dishes with the original cells. After a 2-h incubation (5% CO2, 37°C to allow feeder cells to attach to dishes), the suspended cells were removed and plated in colony, 3H-thymidine, or long-term culture assays.

Colony Assays
After zero, three, five, or eight days in culture, CD34+ cells were harvested and plated in triplicate in a semisolid medium (0.3% bacto-agar in IMDM, 20% FBS, 50 ng/ml gentamicin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin) supplemented with 4 U/ml erythropoietin (Epoetin alpha, Epogen) and 50 ng/ml each of IL-3, IL-6, and SCF (generously provided by Amgen). Cultures were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 and enumerated after 14 to 20 days of culture.

Long-Term Cultures
Cells harvested from the co-culture assay were plated on a confluent layer of irradated (2,000 rads) normal human stroma (passage 4). Either 50, 130, or 250 cells from the co-culture were added to each well of stroma (96-well plates). These plates were maintained in IMDM supplemented with 30% FBS, 1% deionized bovine serum albumin (BSA) [35], 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 µg/ml gentamicin, 10–5 M ß-mercaptoethanol, and 10–6 M hydrocortisone (Sigma). Once a week, half of the medium was carefully removed from each well, and an equal volume of fresh medium was added.

After four weeks in culture, the cells from these wells were evaluated for cobblestone area-forming cells or harvested as follows. Half of the medium was carefully removed from the wells, and cells were then removed from the remaining medium by vigorous pipetting and scraping of the wells. Harvested cells were plated in colony assays, as described, using the entire contents of each well in a final colony assay volume of 0.5 ml.

3H-thymidine Incorporation
Co-cultures were plated (as previously described), and on the day indicated, either 3 µCi 3H-thymidine (New England Nuclear; Boston, MA), 3 µCi 3H-thymidine and 800-fold excess dTTP (Life Technologies), or 3 µCi 3H-thymidine and 800-fold excess dCTP (Life Technologies) was added to triplicate co-culture wells. After 22 h, cells were harvested as described above. Resulting hematopoietic cells were lysed with 0.5% Triton X-100, and lysates were collected on glass fiber filters using a vacuum manifold (V&P Scientific; San Diego, CA). After three washes with PBS, two washes with 95% EtOH and 5-10 min of air drying, the filters were placed in scintillation cocktail (Beckman Ready Safe, Beckman Scientific; Fullerton, CA) and counted in a Beckman LS1800 liquid scintillation counter. Unlabeled dTTP typically competed away 90% of the 3H-thymidine incorporation; addition of dCTP showed no effect.

Propidium Iodide Staining of Cells for Viability and Cell Cycle Analysis
Hematopoietic cells were harvested from five-day co-cultures, as described. Cells were then resuspended at either 106/ml in hypotonic DNA staining buffer [36] for cell cycle analysis or resuspended at 3 x 105/ml in PBS containing 1 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI), 0.2% BSA, and 0.1% sodium azide (Sigma) for viability analysis. Hypotonic DNA staining buffer consisted of 1 mg/ml sodium citrate, 0.3% Triton-X100, 100 ng/ml PI, and 20 µg/ml Rnase A (Sigma). Cells were analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer using Cell Quest and Modefit software (Becton-Dickinson). At least 5,000 cells per sample were analyzed for viability, and 10,000 cells per sample were analyzed for cell cycle progression.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Jagged1, a Ligand for Notch, Is Expressed by Bone Marrow Stromal Cells
Previous work has characterized the expression of Notch receptors on human CD34+ hematopoietic cells [32]. Based on the close physical association of immature precursors with bone marrow stroma and, thus, the likelihood that interaction between these cell types would activate Notch signaling, experiments were performed to determine whether the Notch ligand, Jagged1, is expressed by normal human stroma and/or murine stromal cell lines. Five murine stromal cell lines, AC-6, ALC5, S10, S17, and TC-1, were analyzed by Western blot ( Fig. 1A). The Jagged1 protein, having an approximate molecular weight of 150 kd, was detected in three of the five stromal cell lines, AC-6, ALC5, and TC-1, but not in two others, S10 and S17.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Western blot analysis of cell lysates for Jagged1 expression. A) Lysates were prepared from the murine stromal cell lines, AC6, ALC5, TC-1, S10, and S17. Control cell lysates were prepared from C2C12 cells transduced with vector alone or the entire coding sequence of rat Jagged1. Jagged1 protein (~150 kd) was detected with the J59 antibody in AC6, ALC5, and TC-1 cells, but not in S10 or S17 cells. B) Lysates were prepared from each cell type used as a feeder layer in CD34 co-culture experiments, including C2C12, 3T3, or S17 cells transduced with vector alone or the entire coding sequence of rat Jagged1. High levels of Jagged1 expression were detected with the J59 antibody in all transduced cell lines.

 
To characterize expression of Notch ligands by primary human stromal cells, poly A+ RNA was prepared from primary human bone marrow stroma, and degenerate PCR primers were used to generate a probe for human Jagged1. A cDNA library was constructed from normal human stromal poly A+ RNA. Of 260,000 clones screened, two positive clones were characterized. The amino acid sequences of both positive clones identified had 99% homology to two human Jagged1 sequences in the Genbank database (accession #U61276 and #U73936). Based on these results, Jagged1, a ligand for Notch1, is expressed in cultured human stromal cells, as well as a subset of stromal cell lines.

In the Absence of Recombinant Cytokines, Jagged1 Inhibits CD34+ Cell Proliferation
Hematopoietic growth factors stimulate proliferation of progenitors, which is tightly linked to differentiation in normal cells. To test the effect of Notch on these processes, we established an in vitro co-culture system in the absence of recombinant cytokines. The availability of stromal and fibrobast cell lines with low or undetectable expression of Jagged1 made it possible to evaluate the effect of this Notch ligand on CD34+ hematopoietic precursors derived from human adult bone marrow. Vector alone or full-length Jagged1 was transduced into C2C12, NIH 3T3, and S17 cell lines, all of which have low or undetectable levels of endogenous Jagged1 expression. Robust expression of Jagged1 in the transduced populations was confirmed by Western analysis ( Fig. 1B). The presence of Notch1 on purified human CD34+ cells was confirmed using FACS analysis ( Fig. 2).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Notch1 expression in human CD34+ bone marrow cells. Fluorescence histograms of CD34+ cells (98% pure) stained with 93-4 antibody (Ab), an affinity-purified rabbit antiserum to the intracellular domain of rat Notch1. The y-axis represents cell number, and the x-axis represents log fluorescence intensity. The solid line represents staining with 93-4 Ab, and the dashed line represents staining with an equivalent amount of normal rabbit IgG.

 
Co-cultures were established in which CD34+ cells were plated either onto cells containing vector sequence alone or onto a corresponding feeder layer of cells engineered to express recombinant Jagged1. Hematopoietic cells were harvested on days 7 or 8, and plated in semisolid media to enumerate relatively mature colony-forming cells; that is, colony-forming units, cells (CFU-C); colony-forming units, erythroid (CFU-E); and BFU-E. Because of the inherent variability in the number of colony-forming cells in each independent starting sample, the number of colony-forming cells on Jagged1-expressing feeder layers at the end of each experiment was compared to controls and expressed as fold change. Colony assays from each co-culture were always performed in triplicate. All fold changes were averaged to generate the mean results shown in Table 1. Because of the potential variability introduced into the system by the feeder layer cells themselves, at least two different feeder layers were used under each condition. In this way, it was possible to confirm that the observed effects were due to the presence of Jagged1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of Jagged on colony formation by CD34 precursors
 
When CD34+ cells were cultured on Jagged1-expressing feeder layers for seven to eight days, erythroid colony formation (CFU-E and BFU-E) was unaffected, but myeloid colonies (CFU-C) were reduced threefold compared to controls ( Table 1; p < 0.03). This trend was apparent regardless of the cell line (3T3, n = 4; C2C12, n = 1; or S17, n = 1) used in the feeder layer. Data obtained from the four experiments using 3T3 cells only are also shown in Table 1. Data from a representative experiment in which hematopoietic cells were cultured on 3T3 feeder layers and harvested at both days 3 and 8 of co-culture are shown in Figure 3.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of Jagged1 on myeloid colony formation by CD34 precursors. CD34+ cells were cultured on 3T3 feeder layers transduced with rat Jagged1 (Jagged1) or with vector alone (control). After three or eight days of culture, hematopoietic cells were harvested, counted, and plated into triplicate colony assays at 7,500 cells per well. Total myeloid colonies from each co-culture were calculated based on the number of colonies/7,500 cells and the number of hematopoietic cells in each co-culture. *p < 0.02 by Student's t test.

 
3H-thymidine incorporation in the absence of recombinant growth factor stimulation was used to evaluate the relative levels of cellular proliferation in the presence of recombinant Jagged1. A reproducible reduction in 3H-thymidine incorporation was observed in seven experiments when normal CD34+ cells were cultured on 3T3 feeder layers expressing recombinant Jagged1 for 4 to 15 days. 3H-thymidine incorporation was reduced by a mean fold of 2.9 ± 0.6 compared to controls (p < 0.01 Student's t-test). A representative experiment is shown in Figure 4. The observed decrease in 3H-thymidine incorporation in CD34+ cells correlates well with the reduction in colony-forming cells ( Table 1).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of Jagged1 on 3H-thymidine incorporation by CD34 precursors. CD34+ cells were cultured on 3T3 feeder layers transduced with rat Jagged1 (Jagged) or with vector alone (control). Co-cultures were established in triplicate. After 4, 8, or 11 days of culture, 3 µCi of 3H-thymidine were added to each co-culture for approximately 22 h prior to harvesting the hematopoietic cells. Values represent mean counts ± SE per 10,000 hematopoietic cells for triplicate co-culture wells from one experiment. *p < 0.04 by Student's t test.

 
To demonstrate that the reduction in colony-forming cells and 3H-thymidine incorporation was not due to Jagged-induced cell death, the viability and cell cycle profile of hematopoietic cells after five days of co-culture on 3T3 feeder layers was determined. CD34 expression was also evaluated. In one representative experiment, the percent of cells remaining CD34+ decreased from 97% on day 0 to 55% and 46% in the absence and presence of Jagged1, respectively. In five independent experiments, the mean viability of hematopoietic cells co-cultured in the absence (90%) and presence (87%) of Jagged1 was not significantly different, as measured by flow cytometric analysis of PI-stained cells ( Table 2). PI-stained nuclei were also analyzed to determine their distributions within the cell cycle in these five experiments. Consistent with reduced 3H-thymidine incorporation, cells cultured in the presence of Jagged1 showed a lower percentage of cells in S phase (21% versus 26%; p < 0.02) and a higher percentage in G0/G1 phase (76% versus 71%; p < 0.04) when compared to controls ( Table 2). These results suggest that in the absence of a recombinant growth factor stimulus, Jagged1 inhibits the proliferation of immature human hematopoietic precursors, perhaps preserving them instead in a quiescent, less differentiated state.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of Jagged1 on the cell cycle of CD34 precursors
 
To examine the enhanced survival of immature precursors in the presence of Jagged1, preliminary studies using long-term cultures were performed. Hematopoietic precursors were grown on feeder layers with or without Jagged1 for seven to eight days, and then cultured on normal human stroma for four weeks prior to being scored for cobblestone areas or colony formation. In experiment 1, exposure to Jagged1 on C2C12 cells significantly increased cobblestone area formation compared to controls. Fifty percent of 18 wells, each containing 50 precursors derived from Jagged1 co-cultures, developed cobblestone-forming areas. By contrast, only 4% of the 29 control wells, each containing 130 precursors, did so (p < 0.001, two-sided Fisher's exact test with mid-p correction). In a second experiment, exposure to Jagged1 on S17 cells was associated with a trend toward increased colony-forming cells. Seventy-five percent of eight wells derived from Jagged1 co-cultures gave rise to colonies after four weeks, whereas only 25% of the eight control wells did so (250 precursors per well in both cases, p = 0.07). This increase in immature precursors supports the hypothesis that the Jagged1-Notch pathway can either preserve or expand such precursors in culture.

The Presence of Cytokines IL-3, IL-6, SCF, and G-CSF Overrides the Inhibitory Effect of Jagged1
The next series of experiments was designed to provide CD34+ cells with a potent signal to both proliferate and mature, in an effort to determine whether the effect of Jagged1 could be overcome. Previous work in vitro has shown that the addition of IL-3, IL-6, SCF, and G-CSF stimulates both optimal expansion and maturation of myeloid elements [37]. To determine the interaction of the Notch signaling pathway with a potent stimulus for the maturation of myeloid elements in vitro, CD34+ cells were cultured for one week in the presence of these four factors on control C2C12 feeder layers or on C2C12 feeders engineered to express recombinant Jagged1. Two independent experiments under these conditions showed that Jagged1 exerted no reproducible effect on either the overall expansion of hematopoietic cells or the numbers of erythroid and myeloid colony-forming cells (data not shown).

Jagged1 Increases Erythroid Progenitors in the Presence of SCF
It is possible that Notch signaling cannot alter the strong maturation stimulus provided by the IL-3, IL-6, SCF, and G-CSF cytokine combination. To test this idea, a third series of co-culture experiments was performed exactly as described above, except that only one factor, recombinant SCF, was added to the co-culture medium. SCF has been shown to act as a survival factor and to play an important role in erythropoiesis [5, 38, 39]. Hematopoietic progenitors were harvested on days 3 through 8, and colony-forming cells were enumerated in semisolid media.

Seven independent co-culture experiments were performed in the presence of SCF alone for seven to eight days using either C2C12 cells (n = 5) or 3T3 cells (n = 2) as feeders. The presence of Jagged1 increased erythroid colony formation approximately twofold ( Table 1; p < 0.03) compared to controls, regardless of the cell type used in the feeder layer. The increase in erythroid colonies in the presence of Jagged1 suggests that Notch cooperates with SCF to enhance the survival of erythroid progenitors. In contrast, no differences in myeloid colonies were observed in the presence of SCF after seven to eight days of co-culture.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The Notch receptor has been shown to be widely expressed throughout evolution, as well as in a broad array of mammalian cells and tissues [9, 20, 21]. In general, Notch and its ligands have been implicated in cell fate decisions involving lineage commitment and maturation [6, 40]. Activated forms of Notch have been shown to alter the ability of cells to respond to differentiation cues and to preserve cells in an undifferentiated state [10-19]. Because of its widespread expression, it is generally thought that rather than transducing a specific signal to a cell, Notch acts as a modulator of other cellular cues [6, 20]. Given that Notch is expressed on CD34+ precursors, it has been proposed as an important mediator of early commitment decisions [32]. In studies reported here, we demonstrate expression of the Notch ligand, Jagged1, on normal human stromal cells and a subset of murine stromal cell lines. This is consistent with a model in which Notch and Jagged mediate an important interaction between hematopoietic cells and the bone marrow stroma, which could function in regulating cell type differentiation during hematopoiesis.

Our studies demonstrate, for the first time, a physiologic role of endogenous Notch in the modulation of human hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation and maturation. Consistent effects of Jagged1 were observed in the absence of a strong proliferative signal from exogenously added growth factors. A clear decrease in myeloid colonies was closely mirrored and supported by a reduction in total cell numbers, 3H-thymidine incorporation and entry into S phase. Cells co-cultured on Jagged1-expressing feeder layers showed no significant loss in viability when compared to controls. Conversely, early precursors, as measured by the generation of colony-forming cells after long-term culture, were increased in the presence of Jagged1. The ability of Notch signaling to preserve CD34+ cells in an immature state is consistent with studies showing that Notch signaling can inhibit the differentiation of 32D cells [10-12] and the differentiation of murine myoblasts [13-19].

In contrast, when CD34+ cells were cultured in the presence of a strong signal to proliferate and mature (IL-3, IL-6, SCF, G-CSF), the presence of Jagged1 in the feeder layer did not significantly alter either the fold expansion or the types of colonies formed. These results suggest that Notch signaling induced by Jagged1 cannot override the response of relatively mature progenitors to a strong proliferative signal. In an attempt to reproduce a microenvironment in which an interaction between Notch signaling and a cytokine signal might be observed, we performed co-cultures in which only recombinant SCF was added. SCF enhances the viability of hematopoietic precursors, but on its own, does not drive proliferation and/or differentiation [5]. We observed a twofold increase in erythroid colonies derived from co-cultures supplemented with SCF alone, suggesting that Notch signaling enhances the survival of erythroid progenitors in the presence of SCF. The Notch-induced modulation of the SCF signal is consistent with the Notch-induced modulation of the G-CSF signal observed in 32D cells. G-CSF ordinarily induces cell cycle arrest and terminal differentiation in 32D cells, but activated forms of Notch1 and receptor engagement by Jagged1 allow 32D myeloid progenitors to survive in the presence of G-CSF [10-12].

The enhanced survival of erythroid progenitors observed in our Jagged1 co-cultures supplements the recent results of Varnum-Finney et al. [31] and Jones et al. [33], which suggest that Jagged1-Notch signaling in hematopoietic cells promotes the survival of a primitive precursor. Both groups used co-culture systems similar to the one used here, except that they employed murine rather than human hematopoietic precursors, which they derived either from adult bone marrow [31] or from fetal aorto gonadal mesonephros and fetal liver [33]. Neither group used more than a single growth factor combination. In one case, a cocktail consisting of IL-6, IL-11, SCF, and the Flt-3 ligand was used [31], and in the other, precursor cells were exposed to SCF and IL-7 [33]. These cytokines in all likelihood enhance precursor survival in vitro but do not deliver a strong erythroid or myeloid differentiation stimulus. Both groups observed increases in immature high proliferative potential colony-forming cells (HPP-CFC) and, in one case, increases in more mature, committed CFU-C in the presence of Jagged1 [31].

In the co-cultures described here, which were supplemented with SCF alone, we saw an increase in erythroid but not myeloid progenitors, suggesting that Notch signaling was active in a lineage-committed cell. Varnum-Finney et al. and Jones et al. observed that Notch signaling enhanced the survival of a more primitive cell type, the HPP-CFC, or possibly an HPP-CFC precursor. We also observed the maintenance of a primitive colony-forming cell, which we derived from long-term culture. Taken together, these results suggest that Notch signaling can act at different stages in hematopoietic differentiation, including both pluripotent stem cells and lineage-committed progenitors.

The Notch-induced modulation of the SCF signal suggests that signaling downstream of the Notch receptor may interact with signaling downstream of the tyrosine kinase SCF receptor. SCF is required to prime progenitors for signaling through the erythropoietin receptor [38, 39]. Through interaction with its receptor, SCF activates the erythropoietin receptor by tyrosine phosphorylation [39], which, in turn, induces proliferation and maturation of CFU-E [41]. It is unclear how the intracellular components of Notch signaling pathways might interact with this process.

Taken together, our experiments support a role for Notch in the earliest events of hematopoiesis and stem cell commitment. In the absence of recombinant growth factors, the Jagged1-Notch pathway acts to preserve cells in an immature state and to prevent their proliferation. However, once an appropriate stimulus is present, our experiments with SCF suggest that Notch signaling can enhance the survival of a more committed progenitor. Thus, it is likely that at many stages of hematopoiesis, just as in other developmental systems, Notch signaling alters the response of undifferentiated cells to the signals required for cell type specification.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Elliot Landaw for excellent assistance with statistical analysis. We thank Anne Carlson, Jeanne McAdara, and Tina Tan for helpful discussions, and Wendy Aft for excellent preparation of the manuscript. Flow cytometry was performed in the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Core Laboratory with the assistance of Negoita Neagos, and in the laboratory of Dr. Kenneth Dorshkind at UCLA with the assistance of Enca Montecino-Rodriguez.

This work was supported in part by NIH grants R01 CA40163 and PO1 CA32737 (J.C.G.), and the UCLA Training Program in Biotechnology #5T32 GM08375 (L.W.). The UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Core Laboratory and the Statistical and Epidemiology Service are both supported by the NIH Cancer Center support grant CA16042.


    Footnotes
 
* Both authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kaushansky K. A new feature: controversies in hematology. Blood 1998;92:345-352.[Free Full Text]

  2. Morrison SJ, Shah NM, Anderson DJ. Regulatory mechanisms in stem cell biology. Cell 1997;88:287-298.[Medline]

  3. Dorshkind K. Regulation of hemopoiesis by bone marrow stromal cells and their products. Annu Rev Immunol 1990;8:111-137.[Medline]

  4. Müller-Sieberg CE, Deryugina E. The stromal cells' guide to the stem cell universe. STEM CELLS 1995;13:471-483.

  5. Lyman SD, Jacobsen SEW. c-kit ligand and Flt3 ligand: stem/progenitor cell factors with overlapping yet distinct activities. Blood 1998;91:1101-1134.[Free Full Text]

  6. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Matsuno K, Fortini ME. Notch signaling. Science 1995;268:225-232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Robey E, Chang D, Itano A et al. An activated form of Notch influences the choice between CD4 and CD8 T cell lineages. Cell 1996;87:483-492.[Medline]

  8. Washburn T, Schweighoffer E, Gridley T et al. Notch activity influences the {alpha}ß versus {gamma}{delta} T cell lineage decision. Cell 1997;88:833-843.[Medline]

  9. Robey E. Notch in vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1997;7:551-557.[Medline]

  10. Bigas A, Martin DIK, Milner LA. Notch1 and Notch2 inhibit myeloid differentiation in response to different cytokines. Mol Cell Biol 1998;18:2324-2333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Li L, Milner LA, Deng Y et al. The human homolog of rat Jagged1 expressed by marrow stroma inhibits differentiation of 32D cells through interaction with Notch1. Immunity 1998;8:43-55.[Medline]

  12. Milner LA, Bigas A, Kopan R et al. Inhibition of granulocytic differentiation by mNotch1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:13014-13019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Lindsell CE, Shawber CJ, Boulter J et al. Jagged: a mammalian ligand that activates Notch1. Cell 1995;80:909-917.[Medline]

  14. Luo B, Aster JC, Hasserjian RP et al. Isolation and functional analysis of a cDNA for human Jagged2, a gene encoding a ligand for the Notch1 receptor. Mol Cell Biol 1997;17:6057-6067.[Abstract]

  15. Shawber C, Nofziger D, Hsieh JJ-D et al. Notch signaling inhibits muscle cell differentiation through a CBF1-independent pathway. Development 1996;122:3765-3773.[Abstract]

  16. Kato H, Taniguchi Y, Kurooka H et al. Involvement of RBP-J in biological functions of mouse Notch1 and its derivatives. Development 1997;124:4133-4141.[Abstract]

  17. Kopan R, Nye JS, Weintrub H. The intracellular domain of mouse Notch: a constitutively activated repressor of myogenesis directed at the basic helix-loop-helix region of MyoD. Development 1994;120:2385-2396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Nye JS, Kopan R, Axel R. An activated Notch suppresses neurogenesis and myogenesis but not gliogenesis in mammalian cells. Development 1994;120:2421-2430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Sakai T, Taniguchi Y, Tamura K et al. Functional replacement of the intracellular region of the Notch1 receptor by Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2. J Virol 1998;72:6034-6039.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Weinmaster G. The ins and outs of Notch signaling. Mol Cell Neurosci 1997;9:91-102.[Medline]

  21. Gridley T. Notch signaling in vertebrate development and disease. Mol Cell Neurosci 1997;9:103-108.

  22. Bettenhausen B, Hrabe de Angelis M, Simon D et al. Transient and restricted expression during mouse embryogenesis of Dll1, a murine gene closely related to Drosophila Delta. Development 1995;121:2407-2418.[Abstract]

  23. Dunwoodie SL, Henrique D, Harrison SM et al. Mouse Dll3: a novel divergent Delta gene which may complement the function of other Delta homologues during early pattern formation in the mouse embryo. Development 1997;124:3065-3076.[Abstract]

  24. Jiang R, Lan Y, Chapman HD et al. Defects in limb, craniofacial, and thymic development in Jagged2 mutant mice. Genes Dev 1998;12:1046-1057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Shawber C, Boulter J, Lindsell CE et al. Jagged2: a serrate-like gene expressed during rat embryogenesis. Dev Biol 1996;180:370-376.[Medline]

  26. Mitsiadis TA, Henrique D, Thesleff I et al. Mouse Serrate-1 (Jagged-1): expression in the developing tooth is regulated by epithelium-mesenchymal interactions and fibroblast growth factor-4. Development 1997;124:1473-1483.[Abstract]

  27. Lindsell CE, Boulter J, diSibio G et al. Expression patterns of Jagged, Delta1, Notch1, Notch2, and Notch3 genes identify ligand-receptor pairs that may function in neural development. Mol Cell Neurosci 1996;8:14-27.[Medline]

  28. Hasserjian RP, Aster JC, Davi F et al. Modulated expression of Notch1 during thymocyte development. Blood 1996;88:970-976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Ellisen LW, Bird J, West DC et al. Tan-1, the human homolog of the Drosophila Notch gene, is broken by chromosomal translocations in T lymphoblastic neoplasms. Cell 1991;66:649-661.[Medline]

  30. Weinmaster G, Roberts VJ, Lemke G. Notch2: a second mammalian Notch gene. Development 1992;116:931-941.[Abstract]

  31. Varnum-Finney B, Purton LE, Yu M et al. The Notch ligand, Jagged-1, influences the development of primitive hematopoietic precursor cells. Blood 1998;91:4084-4091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Milner LA, Kopan R, Martin DIK et al. A human homologue of the Drosophila development gene, Notch, is expressed in CD34+ hematopoietic precursors. Blood 1994;83:2057-2062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  33. Jones P, May G, Healy L et al. Stromal expression of Jagged1 promotes colony formation by fetal hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 1998;92:1505-1511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  34. Mizushima S, Nagata S. pEF-BOS, a powerful mammalian expression vector. Nucleic Acids Res 1990;18:5322.[Free Full Text]

  35. Nolta JA, Kohn DB. Human hematopoietic cell culture, transduction, and analyses. In: Haines JL, Korf BR, Moir DT et al., eds. Current Protocols in Human Genetics, Vol. 2. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997:7,13,25.

  36. Krishan A. Rapid flow cytofluorometric analysis of mammalian cell cycle by propidium iodide staining. J Cell Biol 1975;66:183-193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Lill MC, Lynch M, Fraser JK et al. Production of functional myeloid cells from CD34 selected hematopoietic progenitor cells using a clinically relevant ex vivo expansion system. STEM CELLS 1994;12:626-637.[Abstract]

  38. Wu H, Klingmuller U, Acurio A et al. Functional interaction of erythropoietin and stem cell factor receptors is essential for erythroid colony formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:1806-1810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  39. Wu H, Klingmuller U, Besmer P et al. Interaction of the erythropoietin and stem-cell-factor receptors. Nature 1995;377:242-246.[Medline]

  40. Kimble J, Simpson P. The LIN-12/Notch signaling pathway and its regulation. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 1997;13:333-361.[Medline]

  41. Wu H, Liu X, Jaenisch R et al. Generation of committed erythroid BFU-E and CFU-E progenitors does not require erythropoietin or the erythropoietin receptor. Cell 1995;83:59-67.[Medline]

accepted for publication April 1, 1999.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. Urs, A. Roudabush, C. F. O'Neill, I. Pinz, I. Prudovsky, D. Kacer, Y. Tang, L. Liaw, and D. Small
Soluble Forms of the Notch Ligands Delta1 and Jagged1 Promote in Vivo Tumorigenicity in NIH3T3 Fibroblasts with Distinct Phenotypes
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2008; 173(3): 865 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Strehl, K. Nebral, M. Konig, J. Harbott, H. Strobl, R. Ratei, S. Struski, B. Bielorai, M. Lessard, M. Zimmermann, et al.
ETV6-NCOA2: A Novel Fusion Gene in Acute Leukemia Associated with Coexpression of T-Lymphoid and Myeloid Markers and Frequent NOTCH1 Mutations
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 14(4): 977 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
U. Ganapati, H. T. Tan, M. Lynch, M. Dolezal, S. de Vos, and J. C. Gasson
Modeling Notch Signaling in Normal and Neoplastic Hematopoiesis: Global Gene Expression Profiling in Response to Activated Notch Expression
Stem Cells, August 1, 2007; 25(8): 1872 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Yu, C. Liu, K. Su, J. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, C. Li, Y. Cong, R. Kimberly, W. E. Grizzle, et al.
Tumor Exosomes Inhibit Differentiation of Bone Marrow Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 6867 - 6875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
N. Chadwick, M. C. Nostro, M. Baron, R. Mottram, G. Brady, and A.-M. Buckle
Notch Signaling Induces Apoptosis in Primary Human CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells
Stem Cells, January 1, 2007; 25(1): 203 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
S. Chiba
Concise Review: Notch Signaling in Stem Cell Systems
Stem Cells, November 1, 2006; 24(11): 2437 - 2447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
I. Rooman, N. De Medts, L. Baeyens, J. Lardon, S. De Breuck, H. Heimberg, and L. Bouwens
Expression of the Notch Signaling Pathway and Effect on Exocrine Cell Proliferation in Adult Rat Pancreas
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2006; 169(4): 1206 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. F. de Pooter, T. M. Schmitt, J. L. de la Pompa, Y. Fujiwara, S. H. Orkin, and J. C. Zuniga-Pflucker
Notch Signaling Requires GATA-2 to Inhibit Myelopoiesis from Embryonic Stem Cells and Primary Hemopoietic Progenitors
J. Immunol., May 1, 2006; 176(9): 5267 - 5275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
H. Neves, F. Weerkamp, A. C. Gomes, B. A. E. Naber, P. Gameiro, J. D. Becker, P. Lucio, N. Clode, J. J. M. Van Dongen, F. J. T. Staal, et al.
Effects of Delta1 and Jagged1 on Early Human Hematopoiesis: Correlation with Expression of Notch Signaling-Related Genes in CD34+ Cells
Stem Cells, May 1, 2006; 24(5): 1328 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
L. M. Kamminga and G. de Haan
Cellular Memory and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Aging
Stem Cells, May 1, 2006; 24(5): 1143 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Delaney, B. Varnum-Finney, K. Aoyama, C. Brashem-Stein, and I. D. Bernstein
Dose-dependent effects of the Notch ligand Delta1 on ex vivo differentiation and in vivo marrow repopulating ability of cord blood cells
Blood, October 15, 2005; 106(8): 2693 - 2699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
N. Hoshino, N. Katayama, T. Shibasaki, K. Ohishi, J. Nishioka, M. Masuya, Y. Miyahara, M. Hayashida, D. Shimomura, T. Kato, et al.
A novel role for Notch ligand Delta-1 as a regulator of human Langerhans cell development from blood monocytes
J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2005; 78(4): 921 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
J. S. Dando, M. Tavian, C. Catelain, S. Poirault, A. Bennaceur-Griscelli, F. Sainteny, W. Vainchenker, B. Peault, and E. Lauret
Notch/Delta4 Interaction in Human Embryonic Liver CD34+ CD38- Cells: Positive Influence on BFU-E Production and LTC-IC Potential Maintenance
Stem Cells, April 1, 2005; 23(4): 550 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. N. La Motte-Mohs, E. Herer, and J. C. Zuniga-Pflucker
Induction of T-cell development from human cord blood hematopoietic stem cells by Delta-like 1 in vitro
Blood, February 15, 2005; 105(4): 1431 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. M. Vercauteren and H. J. Sutherland
Constitutively active Notch4 promotes early human hematopoietic progenitor cell maintenance while inhibiting differentiation and causes lymphoid abnormalities in vivo
Blood, October 15, 2004; 104(8): 2315 - 2322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
V. Vas, L. Szilagyi, K. Paloczi, and F. Uher
Soluble Jagged-1 is able to inhibit the function of its multivalent form to induce hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal in a surrogate in vitro assay
J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2004; 75(4): 714 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Schroeder, H. Kohlhof, N. Rieber, and U. Just
Notch Signaling Induces Multilineage Myeloid Differentiation and Up-Regulates PU.1 Expression
J. Immunol., June 1, 2003; 170(11): 5538 - 5548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Small, D. Kovalenko, R. Soldi, A. Mandinova, V. Kolev, R. Trifonova, C. Bagala, D. Kacer, C. Battelli, L. Liaw, et al.
Notch Activation Suppresses Fibroblast Growth Factor-dependent Cellular Transformation
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 16405 - 16413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page