Stem Cells http://www.peprotech.com/
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivanovic, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sbarba, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ivanovic, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sbarba, P. D.
Stem Cells, Vol. 17, No. 4, 219-225, July 1999
© 1999 AlphaMed Press

A Simple, One-Step Clonal Assay Allows the Sequential Detection of Committed (CFU-GM-like) Progenitors and Several Subsets of Primitive (HPP-CFC) Murine Progenitors

Zoran Ivanovica, Benedetta Bartolozzib, Pietro Antonio Bernabeib, Maria Grazia Cipolleschia, Pavle Milenkovicc, Vincent Pralorand, Persio Dello Sbarbaa

a Department of Experimental Pathology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy;
b Department of Hematology, A.O. Careggi, Florence, Italy;
c Institute for Medical Research, Belgrade, Yugoslavia;
d Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, University of Limoges, Limoges, France

Key Words. HPP-CFC • IL-3 • G-CSF • In vitro • Mouse • Bone marrow

Dr. Persio Dello Sbarba, Dipartimento di Patologia e Oncologia Sperimentali, Università di Firenze, viale G.B. Morgagni 50, I-50134 Florence, Italy.


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Murine bone marrow (BM) cells were cultured in semisolid medium containing interleukin 3 (IL-3) and high doses of G-CSF. Colonies were counted twice, at day 7 and day 14, and the number of granulocyte/macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) accurately estimated by the subtraction of day-14 from day-7 colonies, based on the principle that colonies detectable at day 7 and persisting beyond day 14 are generated by significantly more immature progenitors. The frequency of colonies relative to their size was determined and used to define subsets of high proliferative potential colony-forming cells (HPP-CFC). Two main groups of HPP-CFC were considered: those generating colonies of 0.6-1.8 mm of diameter or larger than 1.8 mm. The characterization of these groups showed that they correspond to different functional subsets of HPP-CFC. The replating ability of colonies was estimated. The percentage of clonogenic progenitors in the S phase of cell cycle was measured by cytosine arabinoside suicide assay. The sensitivity of colonies to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in vitro was determined and their survival after an in vivo treatment with 5-FU compared with that of colony-forming units in spleen (CFU-S). This technique allowed identification of: A) CFU-GM; B) relatively mature HPP-CFC, probably corresponding to CFU-S day12; C) more primitive HPP-CFC, relatively resistant to 5-FU in vivo and closely corresponding to CFU-S day 14, and D) very primitive HPP-CFC, resistant to 5-FU in vitro. This simple, rapid, and versatile method allows the detection of a broad range of hematopoietic progenitors in murine BM, from committed progenitors to largely quiescent, primitive stem cells, as well as the evaluation of the progenitors' self-renewal and proliferative potential. Stem Cells 1999;17:219-225


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The identification and quantitation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in humans and mice is still a question of major interest for researchers and clinicians. In vivo assays such as spleen colony formation (CFU-S) [1, 2] or bone marrow (BM) repopulation (MRA) are available [3, 4]. As these methods require large numbers of animals, in vitro approaches have been developed. Long-term cultures (LTC) of hematopoietic cells on BM stromal layers [5] allow the proliferation and differentiation of very primitive stem cells [2, 6, 7]. However, quantitative assays based on LTC, such as the measure of LTC-initiating cells [8] or cobblestone area-forming cells [9] are time-consuming and their results difficult to compare among different laboratories due to modifications of the originally described methods [10].

A relatively simple one-step assay allows the detection of high proliferative potential colony-forming cells (HPP-CFC). This assay, developed initially using murine [11] and later human [12] BM, is much faster to perform and its results easier to analyze. HPP-CFC: A) are relatively resistant to an in vivo treatment of mice with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [3]; B) generate macroscopic colonies in response to various combinations of growth factors, and C) have a high replating efficiency in secondary assays. Based on their responsiveness to various combinations of two to several growth factors, HPP-CFC have been classified as primitive (HPP-CFC-1), intermediate (HPP-CFC-2), and mature (HPP-CFC-3) [13, 14]. These progenitors are related to progenitors responsible for MRA, CFU-S/day13 (CFU-Sd13) and CFU-Sd8, respectively. Methylcellulose cultures have been introduced, allowing the transfer of colony cells to secondary clonal assays, and thus, the estimate of the secondary colony-forming efficiency of human HPP-CFC-derived colonies [15].

Human blood HPP-CFC grow in the presence of very high doses of G-CSF [16] and murine HPP-CFC in the presence of interleukin 3 (IL-3) plus relatively low doses of G-CSF [17]. The culture system described here is based on the combination of both high-dose G-CSF and IL-3 with methylcellulose cultures of murine BM cells (BMC). In these cultures, we characterized the size of colonies, their kinetics of appearance and development, and their secondary colony-forming efficiency. The percentage of primary clonogenic progenitors in the S phase of cell cycle and the sensitivity of HPP-CFC to an in vitro incubation with 5-FU were also estimated. Finally, the percentage survival upon in vivo treatment with 5-FU of HPP-CFC was compared with that of CFU-S. The measure of these parameters, taken together, resulted in the development of a simple culture system allowing the sequential detection of committed and primitive clonogenic progenitors.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Preparation of BMC Suspension
BMC were recovered from 10- to 14-week-old CBA mice by injection of RPMI-1640 medium (GIBCO Ltd.; Paisley, UK) into femoral bone shafts, washed, and resuspended in the same medium. Viable cells were counted in a hemocytometer, after suspension in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% acetic acid and 0.03% Trypan blue.

In Vitro Colony-Formation Assay
BMC were plated in a premixed methylcellulose culture medium (Methocult H4230, StemCell Technologies Inc.; Vancouver, Canada), adjusting the final concentrations of methylcellulose to 0.9% and of fetal bovine serum to 30%. Recombinant murine IL-3 (PeproTech EC; London, UK) and recombinant human G-CSF (Neupogen; Dompé BioTec; Milan, Italy) were added at 10 ng/ml and 500 ng/ml, respectively. In preliminary experiments, these concentrations provided the highest number and replating ability of primary colonies. BMC suspensions (0.25 ml) were added to the complete culture medium (2.25 ml), vortexed, and distributed in Petri dishes (Falcon, Becton Dickinson; Meylan, France; 1 ml/dish). Cultures were incubated in a water-saturated, 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Counting of In Vitro Colonies
Colonies (>50 cells) were counted at day 7 and cultures returned to the incubator until day 14, when colonies were counted again. The number of colonies derived from committed progenitors (CFU-GM) was obtained by subtracting the number of colonies scored at day 14 from the number scored at day 7. The colonies still present at day 14 (developed from primitive progenitors) were scored and classified according to their diameter: group 1, diameter 0.6-1.8 mm; group 2, diameter >1.8 mm.

Replating of Cells From Primary In Vitro Colonies
Day-14 colonies harvested from methylcellulose cultures were resuspended in 200 µl of RPMI-1640 and cells counted and replated in secondary methylcellulose cultures established as above. Secondary colonies were scored at days 7 and 14. The same procedure was used to establish tertiary cultures.

Spleen Colony-Formation Assay
This assay was performed according to the method of Till and McCulloch [1], with the modifications described in detail in a previous study [18]. Donor BMC were transplanted into lethally irradiated (x-rays, 9 Gy, 0.96 Gy/min; Philips RT-305 source) syngeneic mice (8-12 mice per group; 4 ¥ 104 cells per mouse). Recipients were killed 8, 12, or 14 days after transplantation, their spleens removed and fixed in Telleyesniczky's solution, and the colonies counted (counts of CFU-Sd8, CFU-Sd12, and CFU-Sd14, respectively).

Cytosine Arabinoside (Ara-C) Suicide Assay
BMC were incubated (106 cells/ml) for 1 h in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 20% horse serum (HyClone; Logan, Utah) in the presence or absence of 20 µg/ml of Ara-C (Roche; Neuilly-sur-Seine, France), an S-phase-specific cytotoxic drug. Cells were then washed three times in PBS and plated at 2 ¥ 104 cells/ml in methylcellulose-containing medium prepared as above. Colonies were scored at days 7 and 14. The ratio of the colony-formation efficiency of Ara-C-treated cells to that of untreated cells represents the percentage of progenitors in the S phase of cell cycle [18].

Determination of HPP-CFC Sensitivity to 5-FU In Vitro
BMC were incubated (106 cells/ml) for 24 h in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 20% HS, in 25 cm2 culture flasks (NUNC-International; Hereford, UK; 10 ml/flask), in the presence or the absence of 10 µg/ml 5-FU (Roche), a cell-cycle-specific cytotoxic drug. Cells were then washed three times in PBS, counted, and plated in methylcellulose cultures established as above (5 ¥ 104 cells/dish). Colonies were scored at days 7 and 14.

Determination of the In Vivo Effects of 5-FU on HPP-CFC and CFU-S
Mice were injected i.v. with 5-FU (150 µg/g), dissolved in 0.2 ml PBS [19] or 0.2 ml PBS (controls) and sacrificed 48 h later. BMC recovered from each animal (six mice per experimental condition) were counted individually as described above and then pooled to concentrations suitable for plating in methylcellulose cultures or transplantation into lethally irradiated mice. Colonies developed in culture or in spleen were counted at days 7 and 14 and at days 8, 12, and 14, respectively. The percentage of 5-FU-resistant progenitors was obtained from the ratio of the colony-formation efficiency of BMC recovered from 5-FU-treated animals to that of control animals.

Statistical Analysis
The differences between variables were evaluated by Student's t-test for independent samples.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characterization and classification of colonies. In methylcellulose cultures of BMC supplemented with IL-3 and G-CSF, more than 95% of colonies appeared between day 3 and day 7. From day 7 to day 14, the number of colonies significantly decreased, while the size of remaining colonies increased. No colony appeared after day 14. The colonies that disappeared before day 14 were classified on the basis of their size, morphology, and cell content as derived from CFU-GM. Their incidence ( Table 1) was linearly related to the number of plated cells (not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Incidence and percentage in S phase of CFU-GM and HPP-CFC in murine BMC
 
The diameter of colonies detectable at day 14 varied from 0.2 mm to 3.6 mm. Since a linear relationship between the number of plated cells and the number of day-14 colonies was observed only for colonies larger than 0.6 mm (not shown), small colonies (<0.6 mm) were ignored. Colonies >0.6 mm were counted and classified into groups differing by 0.1 mm of diameter (Fig. 1). The stepwise increase of incidence observed between colonies smaller and larger than 1.8 mm in diameter led us to distinguish two subsets of day-14 colonies: 0.6-1.8 mm and >1.8 mm. The colonies 0.6-1.8 mm had a lower incidence than day-7 CFU-GM ( Table 1) and contained mainly macrophages, sometimes also neutrophils (not shown). The colonies >1.8mm, detected as frequently as those 0.6-1.8 mm ( Table 1), were macrophage colonies with a densely packed central area and contained from ~40,000 to ~350,000 cells (not shown). These are typical features of HPP-CFC-generated colonies [13]. Stained cytocentrifugates showed that most cells were multinucleated (not shown), as previously described for HPP-CFC colonies derived from human cord blood cells [15]. These colonies persisted in culture and continued to grow for three months.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution of day-14 colonies in function of their diameter. Histograms represent the relative frequency of colonies in function of their size. Groups differ by 0.1 mm colony diameter. Data refer to a total number of 225 colonies obtained in four independent experiments. The dotted line represents cumulative percentages of colonies. Small colonies < 0.6 mm are not included in the graph, as they were not linearly related to the number of plated cells.

 
S Phase Rate of Progenitors
The percentage of each type of progenitor in the S phase of cell cycle was measured by treating BMC in vitro for 1 h with Ara-C prior to their plating for clonal assays (Table 1). Approximately 30% of CFU-GM and HPP progenitors of colonies 0.6-1.8 mm (HPP-CFC 0.6-1.8 mm) were in S phase. By contrast, only about 3% of HPP-CFC >1.8 mm were in S phase.

Replating Ability of HPP-CFC >1.8 mm Colonies
Cells replated from primary colonies >1.8 mm ( Table 2) generated both day-7 and day-14 secondary colonies. Secondary day-14 colonies still contained cells able to generate tertiary day-7 colonies. However, the size of colonies and the clonogenic ability of their cells decreased progressively from primary to tertiary cultures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Replating ability of day-14 colonies larger than 1.8 mm
 
Progenitor Sensitivity to 5-FU In Vitro
The effects of a 24-h in vitro pretreatment of BMC with 5-FU on their colony-forming ability are shown in Table 3. In cultures established with 5-FU-treated cells, the number of both day-7 and day-14 colonies was very low. As all CFU-GM were cycling, the few day-7 colonies were still detectable at day 14. The incidence of 5-FU-resistant colonies (4 ±2 per 105 cells) was 12.5-fold lower than that of colonies generated from control cells. As all 5-FU-resistant colonies were about 3 mm in diameter, their replating ability was compared with that of control colonies having the same diameter and number of cells. Primary 5-FU-resistant (when compared with control) 3-mm colonies generated comparable numbers of secondary day-7 colonies, 2.3 times more day-14 colonies 0.6-1.8 mm, and a sizable number of day-14 colonies >1.8 mm, absent in controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Incidence and replating ability of colonies from BMC treated with 5-FU in vitro
 
Progenitor Sensitivity to 5-FU In Vivo
In order to better define the hierarchical level of progenitors detected in our system, we compared their sensitivity to a two-day in vivo treatment with 5-FU with that of CFU-S day-8, -12, and -14 ( Table 4). The percent survival after 5-FU was 4.0% for CFU-Sd8, 24.2% for CFU-Sd12, and 35.8% for CFU-Sd14. CFU-GM did not survive the treatment, whereas 22.8% of HPP-CFC 0.6-1.8 mm and 36.3% of HPP-CFC >1.8 mm survived. Thus, the percentage survival was strikingly similar for CFU-Sd12 and HPP-CFC 0.6-1.8 mm on one side and for CFU-Sd14 and HPP-CFC >1.8 mm on the other.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Effects of 5-FU in vivo on different types of progenitors
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We describe here a simple experimental system which allows the sequential detection of committed progenitors as well as of different subsets of primitive hematopoietic progenitors of the HPP-CFC family. This system exhibits several original features: A) the use of high-doses of G-CSF, which has not so far been reported in combination with IL-3 and for murine BMC, and B) the counting of colonies twice, at day 7 and day 14, followed by the subtraction of day-14 from day-7 colonies. This procedure provided an accurate estimate of the number of committed progenitors (CFU-GM), based on the principle that colonies detectable at day 7 and persisting beyond day 14 are generated by significantly more immature progenitors. A third peculiarity of the system is the use of the relative frequency of colonies versus their size to define subsets of HPP-CFC. Stepwise increases of incidence between colonies smaller and larger than certain diameter values were detected. This led to classification of colonies into three groups: between 0.6 and 1.8 mm, larger than 1.8 mm, and about 3 mm (5-FU-resistant). The characterization of these progenitor groups showed that they correspond to different functional subsets of HPP-CFC.

The properties of HPP-CFC subsets were characterized first on the basis of two main criteria: A) their sensitivity to an in vitro treatment with 5-FU ( Table 3) and B) the replating ability of the colonies they generated ( Table 2). 5-FU is a cell cycle-specific agent sparing only G0 cells, and is therefore suitable for defining a "resistant" subset of non-cycling cells. 5-FU, indeed, together with cytokine stimulation, were used to identify human super-primitive hematopoietic stem cells [19]. Only colonies generated by HPP-CFC >1.8 mm were capable of generating secondary colonies and were in part (8%) 5-FU resistant. All the colonies generated by 5-FU-resistant HPP-CFC were, in fact, about 3 mm in diameter, so they were compared to 3-mm colonies generated from control cells (a subset evident in Fig. 1). The 5-FU-resistant colonies exhibited a far superior capacity to generate secondary colonies.

Furthermore, to better determine their level in the hematopoietic hierarchy, HPP-CFC subsets defined according to our system were compared with progenitors identified by well-established clonal assays in vivo (CFU-S) and in function of their response to an in vivo treatment with 5-FU ( Table 4). Significant differences in 5-FU resistance were observed among CFU-S subsets, confirming the already described heterogeneity of the CFU-S population [20, 21]. The percentage survival values obtained for CFU-Sd12 and CFU-Sd14 closely matched those of HPP-CFC 0.6-1.8 mm and HPP-CFC >1.8 mm, respectively. The latter, in turn, corresponded very well to the values obtained by Bradley and coworkers after a 5-FU treatment with the same dose and time-schedule as in this study [22]. We concluded that HPP-CFC 0.6-1.8 mm and HPP-CFC >1.8 mm represent quite distinct subsets of progenitors.

On the basis of all of the above, it was possible to identify four types of progenitors ( Table 5), characterized as follows: A) committed progenitors of day-7 colonies (disappeared at day 14), whose incidence, growth kinetics, percentage in S phase and morphology of cell progeny were very similar to those of CFU-GM [23]; B) the progenitors of day-14, 0.6-1.8 mm colonies, apparently corresponding to CFU-Sd12 and more immature than the HPP-CFC3 of McNiece's classification [14] which include CFU-Sd8; C) the main subset of the progenitors of day-14, >1.8mm colonies, slowly cycling (low percentage in S phase), relatively resistant to 5-FU in vivo, but sensitive to 5-FU in vitro; these progenitors exhibit HPP and ability to generate secondary and tertiary colonies, but not the capacity of self-renewal [16], therefore being very similar to CFU-Sd14, and probably corresponding to the HPP-CFC2 of McNiece's classification, and D) a minor subset (8%) of the progenitors of day-14, >1.8 mm colonies, which are mostly non-cycling and thus resistant to 5-FU in vitro; these colonies generate large numbers of secondary colonies, 10% of which were >1.8 mm, and their incidence (4 ± 2 per 105 BMC, Table 3) is similar to that of progenitors endowed with self-renewal ability within the heterogenous "CFU-A" population which includes CFU-S and more primitive stem cells [24, 25], and to that (1-4 per 105 murine BMC) of CAFC day 28 [9], as well as to the incidence of LTC-IC [25, 26]; these progenitors correspond to the HPP-CFC1 of McNiece's classification.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Summary of properties of identified progenitors
 
The results obtained allowed the conclusion that our system represents a simple, rapid and versatile method of estimating, within a murine BMC population, a number of primitive and committed progenitors, including largely quiescent stem cells. Studies of the latter progenitors, in particular, would take advantage of the use of this system, as it requires limited numbers of unenriched BMC and short execution times, yet provides the possibility of evaluating the progenitors' self-renewal and proliferative potential.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The authors thank Prof. Massimo Olivotto, Department of Experimental Pathology and Oncology, University of Florence, for moral and material support to this work, and Dr. Elisabetta Rovida, Department of Experimental Pathology and Oncology, for data analysis and presentation. The project was funded by grants from Ministero della Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) and Regione Toscana (Progetto Qualità). Z.I. was the recipient of a fellowship from AIRC. P.M. was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Serbia. V.P. was supported by a grant from Conseil Regional du Limousin.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Till JE, McCulloch EA. A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res1961; 14 :213 -222.[Medline]

  2. Schofield R, Dexter TM. Studies on the self-renewal ability of CFU-S which have been serially transferred in long-term culture or in vivo. Leuk Res 1985; 9 :305 -313.[Medline]

  3. Hodgson GS, Bradley TR, Radley JM. The organization of hemopoietic tissue as inferred from the effects of 5-fluorouracil. Exp Hematol 1982; 10 :26 -35.[Medline]

  4. Van Zant G. Studies of hematopoietic stem cells spared by 5-fluorouracil. J Exp Med 1984; 159 :679 -690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Dexter TM. Hematopoiesis in long-term bone marrow cultures: a review. Acta Haematol 1979; 62 :299 -305.[Medline]

  6. Chertkov JL, Deryigina EI, Drize NJ et al. Individual clones of hemopoietic stem cells in murine long-term bone marrow culture. Leukemia 1987; 1 :491 -496.[Medline]

  7. van der Sluijs JP, De Jong JP, Brons NHC et al. Marrow repopulating cells, but not CFU-S, establish long-term in vitro hemopoiesis on a marrow-derived stromal layer. Exp Hematol 1990; 18 :893 -896.[Medline]

  8. Ploemacher RE, van der Sluijs JP, Voerman JS et al. An in vitro limiting-dilution assay of long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse. Blood 1989; 74 :2755 -2763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Ploemacher RE, van der Sluijs JP, van Beurden CAJ et al. Use of limiting-dilution type long-term marrow cultures in frequency analysis of marrow-repopulating and spleen colony-forming hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse. Blood 1991; 78 :2527 -2533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Quesenberry PJ. Whiteness of Worchester. Exp Hematol 1998; 26 :455 -456 (editorial).

  11. Bradley TR, Hodgson GS. Detection of primitive macrophage progenitor cells in mouse bone marrow. Blood 1979; 54 :1446 -1450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. McNiece IK, Stewart FM, Deacon DM et al. Detection of a human CFC with a high proliferation potential. Blood 1989; 74 :609 -612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. McNiece IK, Bradley TR, Kriegler AA et al. Subpopulations of mouse bone marrow high-proliferative-potential colony-forming cells. Exp Hematol 1986; 14 :856 -860.[Medline]

  14. McNiece IK, Bertoncello I, Kriegler AB et al. Colony-forming cells with high proliferative potential (HPP-CFC). Int J Cell Cloning 1990; 8 :146 -160.[Abstract]

  15. Lu L, Xiao M, Shen RN et al. Enrichment, characterization, and responsiveness of single primitive CD34+++ human umbilical blood hematopoietic progenitors with high proliferative and replating potential. Blood 1993; 81 :41 -48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Perez-Oteyza J, Ramos P, Testa N et al. High-dose granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in vitro induces the growth of high proliferative potential colony forming cells (HPP-CFC) in patients undergoing blood stem cell mobilization. Exp Hematol 1997; 25 :516 -520.[Medline]

  17. McNiece IK, Stewart FM, Deacon DM et al. Synergistic interactions between hematopoietic growth factors as detected by in vitro mouse bone marrow colony formation. Exp Hematol 1988; 16 :383 -388.[Medline]

  18. Milenkovic P, Ivanovic Z, Stosic-Grujicic S. The in vivo effect of recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist on spleen colony forming cells after radiation-induced myelosuppression. Eur Cytokine Netw 1995; 6 :177 -180.[Medline]

  19. Berardi A, Wang A, Levine J et al. Functional isolation and characterization of human hematopoietic stem cells. Science1995; 267 :104 -108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Hodgson GS, Bradley TR. Properties of haematopoietic stem cells surviving 5-fluorouracil treatment: evidence for a pre-CFU-S cell? Nature 1979; 281 :381 -382.[Medline]

  21. Lord BJ, Woolford LB. Proliferation of spleen colony-forming units (CFU-S8, CFU-S13) and cells with marrow-repopulating ability. Stem Cells 1993 :11 :212 -217.[Abstract]

  22. Bradley TR, Hodgson GS, Bertoncello I. Characteristics of macrophage progenitor cells with high proliferative potential: their relationships to cells with marrow repopulating ability in 5FU-treated mouse bone marrow. In: Baum SJ, Ledney GD, van Bekkum DW, eds. Experimental Hematology Today 1979. New York: Karger 1980;285-297.

  23. Jovcic G, Ivanovic Z, Biljanovic-Paunovic L et al. The effect of IL-1 receptor antagonist on the proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells in regenerating bone marrow. Leukemia 1996; 10 :564 -569.[Medline]

  24. Pragnell IB, Wright EG, Lorimore SA et al. The effect of stem cell proliferation regulators demonstrated with an in vitro assay. Blood 1988; 72 :196 -201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Watt SM, Visser JWM. Recent advances in the growth and isolation of primitive human hemopoietic progenitor cells. Cell Prolif 1992; 25 :263 -297.[Medline]

  26. Boggs DR, Boggs SS, Saxe DF et al. Hematopoietic stem cells with high proliferative potential. Assay of their concentration in marrow by frequency and duration of cure of W/Wv mice. J Clin Invest 1982; 70 :242 -253.

accepted for publication May 24, 1999.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
F. R. Santoni de Sio, P. Cascio, A. Zingale, M. Gasparini, and L. Naldini
Proteasome activity restricts lentiviral gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells and is down-regulated by cytokines that enhance transduction
Blood, June 1, 2006; 107(11): 4257 - 4265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ivanovic, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sbarba, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ivanovic, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Sbarba, P. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS