Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chisi, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Riches, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chisi, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Riches, A. C.
Stem Cells, Vol. 17, No. 6, 339-344, November 1999
© 1999 AlphaMed Press

Captopril Inhibits the Proliferation of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells in Murine Long-Term Bone Marrow Cultures

John Eugenes Chisia, Joanna Wdzieczak-Bakalab, Josiane Thierryb, Cecile V. Briscoea, Andrew C. Richesa

a School of Biology, Medical Science & Human Biology, University of St. Andrews, Scotland, UK;
b Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Key Words. Captopril • LTBMC • Hematopoietic stem cells • AcSDKP • AcSDKP analog • ACE

Correspondence: Dr. Joanna Wdzieczak-Bakala, ICSN, CNRS, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Drugs used mainly for the treatment of hypertension, such as angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, can cause pancytopenia. The underlying cause of this side effect remains unknown. In the present study, long-term bone marrow cultures (LTBMCs) were utilized to evaluate the role of captopril (D-3-mercapto-2-methylpropionyl-L-proline), one of the potent ACE inhibitors, in regulating hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell proliferation. Captopril (10-6 M final concentration) was added to LTBMCs at the beginning of the culture period and at weekly intervals for six weeks. There was no toxicity to the bone marrow cells as measured by the unchanged cell number in the nonadherent layer during the whole culture period, and there was an increased cellularity of the adherent layer at the end of the six weeks of treatment. However, captopril decreased the proportion of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells (GM-CFCs) in S phase at weeks 2 and 3 as well as that of high proliferative potential colony-forming cells (HPP-CFCs) at week 3 in the nonadherent layer. There was no change in the kinetics of the GM-CFCs and HPP-CFCs present in the adherent layer. These results suggest that captopril causes myelosuppression by inhibiting hematopoietic cell proliferation of progenitor and stem cells rather than depleting cells of the bone marrow microenvironment.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Captopril is one of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) known to cause granulocytopenia [1-3], aplastic anemia [4], and pancytopenia [5, 6]. A number of different mechanisms were shown to be involved in drug-induced anemia. Most drugs cause anemia by immune-mediated mechanisms [7] leading to the destruction of red blood cells (hemolytic anemia). However, captopril rarely causes this type of hematological complication. This suggests that this drug causes pancytopenia by other unknown mechanisms. The underlying cause of pancytopenia induced by this ACEI remains unresolved.

Long-term bone marrow culture (LTBMC) appears to embody many of the features of hematopoietic cell regulation in vivo and closely resembles the environment in hematopoietic tissues [8, 9]. In vitro studies have shown that the cells of the adherent layer, either spontaneously or after activation, produce a number of positive soluble factors capable of maintenance, survival, proliferation, differentiation, and extensive self-renewal of hematopoietic cells [10-12]. Some endogenous negative regulators, such as macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha} [13], transforming growth factor-ß [14], and the tetrapeptide acetyl-N-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP) [15], are also involved in the regulation of proliferative activity of primitive hematopoietic cells in LTBMCs.

The fact that hematopoiesis can be maintained for several weeks makes the LTBMC an ideal model for investigating the effects of drugs on hematopoietic tissues in vitro. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether captopril, a potent inhibitor of ACE, exhibited toxic effects on cells present in the two layers in LTBMCs and to examine the eventual effect of this drug on the proliferation of primitive hematopoietic cells. Changes in cell number in the nonadherent layers were monitored following two, three, and five weeks of treatment with captopril and after six weeks of treatment in the adherent layers. The results reported here indicate the absence of toxicity and the ability of captopril to reversibly inhibit the proliferation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. This could explain, at least in part, the hematological depression appearing during chronic administration of ACEI. The eventual role of AcSDKP, an inhibitor of stem cell proliferation and a physiological substrate of ACE, in the control of stem cell proliferation reported for captopril is discussed.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice
All experiments were carried out using 8- to 12-week-old F1 mice (CBA/H x C57BL/6) bred and reared at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, UK. Animals were killed by cervical dislocation, and their femurs were dissected out. The femur cellularity was approximately 1.2 x 107 nucleated cells.

Establishment of Long-Term Bone Marrow Cultures
Each femur was flushed with Fischer's medium (GIBCO BRL; Paisley, UK) supplemented with 20% horse serum ([HS], Globepharm; Esther, Surrey, UK), 50 international units (IU) benzyl penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine and 10–6 M hydrocortisone (Sigma; Pool, Dorset, UK) (F20%HS PS/G Hydro) into a 25-cm2 tissue culture flask (Nunc; Roskilde, Denmark). No attempt was made to make single-cell suspensions. Saline (Antigen Pharmaceuticals; Roscrea, Ireland) or captopril (10–6 M final concentration) (Sigma), was added to the flasks containing 1.2 x 106 nucleated cells/ml at the beginning of culture. Flasks were gassed with air/5% CO2 before incubation at 33°C. Total media change (10 ml), addition of fresh captopril, and gassing was performed once a week. Cells from six flasks treated with saline or captopril were pooled for further analysis. Experimental analysis was performed with cells of the nonadherent layer collected at the end of weeks 2, 3, and 5. Adherent layer cells were removed using a cell scraper (Greiner, Frickenhausen, UK) at the end of week 6. Adherent cells were pooled in 10 ml of medium per flask for analysis.

Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Forming Cell (GM-CFC) Assay
Cells (5 x 104 cells/ml) were suspended in Dulbecco's medium (GIBCO BRL) supplemented with 20% HS, 50 IU benzyl penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine (D20%HS PS/G) with 0.3% melted agar (Bacto Agar, Difco Labs; Detroit, MI). One ml of cell suspension was plated in each non-tissue culture grade 30-mm Petri dish (Sterilin; Stone, UK) in the presence of 40 U/ml, murine recombinant GM-CSF (Immunex; WA). Petri dishes were incubated in a fully humidified air/10% CO2 incubator at 37°C for seven days. At the end of the incubation period, colonies of more than 50 cells were counted using a dark field microscope. The proportion of GM-CFC in S phase was determined by incubating cells with cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) (25 µg/ml) (Sigma) for 1 h prior to plating.

High Proliferative Potential Colony-Forming Cell (HPP-CFC) Assay
The HPP-CFC assay was performed as previously described [16]. Briefly, cells were grown over a feeder made up of 0.5% melted agar (Bacto Agar, Difco Labs) in D20%HS PS/G supplemented with WEHI-3B- and L929-conditioned media used as a crude source of interleukin 3 and macrophage-colony stimulating factor. A cellular layer was made up of 5 x 104 nucleated cells/ml in D20%HS PS/G with 0.3% melted agar. Cultures were incubated in a fully humidified air/10% CO2 incubator at 37°C. On day 13, the vital stain 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride (BDH Chemicals Ltd.; Poole, UK) was added, and colonies (>2 mm) were counted on day 14. The proportion of HPP-CFC in S phase was determined by incubating cells with Ara-C (25 µg/ml) for 1 h prior to plating.

Statistical Analysis
Four independent studies were performed for each group of experiments. Cells from six pooled flasks were counted and analyzed for the proportion of GM-CFCs and HPP-CFCs in S phase. Hematopoietic cells from flasks were routinely plated in eight Petri dishes for GM-CFC and four Petri dishes for HPP-CFC. Therefore, colonies in 64 Petri dishes for GM-CFC S-phase assay and colonies in 32 Petri dishes for HPP-CFC S-phase assay at each week were counted. The statistical significance of the results was determined by the unpaired Students' t-test. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of Captopril on the Number of Cells Present in Nonadherent and Adherent Layers of LTBMCs
The number of nucleated cells in LTMBC nonadherent layers was determined at the end of weeks 2, 3, and 5 of culture. As shown in Figure 1AGo, there was no difference in cell counts between saline- and captopril-treated cultures examined at weeks 2, 3, and 5. However, a statistically significant increase in cellularity of the adherent layer was observed in LTBMCs after six weeks of treatment with captopril. As shown in Figure 1BGo, the number of cells per flask in the adherent layers of the saline- and captopril-treated cultures was respectively (23.8 ± 2.7) x 106 and (33 ± 2.1) x 106 (p < 0.05).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of captopril on the number of cells present in (A) the nonadherent and (B) the adherent layers of LTBMCs. Results represent the mean ± SE of four independent experiments. There was a significant difference between the cellularity of the adherent layer in the saline- and captopril-treated groups on week 6 (*p < 0.05).

 
Effect of Captopril on the Proliferation of GM-CFCs Present in Nonadherent and Adherent Layers of LTBMCs
As shown in Figure 2A, Goa statistically significant decrease in the proportion of cycling GM-CFCs present in the nonadherent layer was observed in the captopril-treated cultures analyzed at weeks 2 and 3. The results indicate that after two weeks, 57.5 ± 9% GM-CFCs were in S phase in the saline control cultures, while with captopril this value fell to 24.1 ± 4.6% (p < 0.05). At week 3, the proportion of GM-CFCs in S phase in the control cultures was 53.6 ± 4.6%. Captopril reduced this value to 17.4 ± 11% (p < 0.05). However, no significant decrease in the proportion of GM-CFCs in S phase with captopril was observed at five weeks. It has been shown that 47.6 ± 5.8% and 28.1 ± 7.8% of GM-CFCs were in S phase respectively in the saline- and captopril-treated cultures.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The effect of captopril on the proportion of GM-CFCs in S phase present in (A) the nonadherent layer and (B) the adherent layer of LTBMCs. Results represent the mean ± SE of four independent experiments. There was a significant difference in the proportion of GM-CFC in S phase in the nonadherent layer on weeks 2 and 3 of the captopril-treated group (*p < 0.05).

 
Results for the proliferative state of GM-CFCs in the adherent layer of LTBMCs treated for six weeks with captopril are presented in Figure 2BGo. As shown, captopril did not inhibit the proliferation of GM-CFCs under these experimental conditions. In the saline- and captopril-treated cultures 36.4 ± 4.5% and 22.1 ± 16% of GM-CFCs were in S phase, respectively. Although there was an increase in cellularity of the adherent layer in the captopril-treated group, there was no statistically significant increase in the absolute numbers of GM-CFCs per flask (saline 2,888 ± 558 and captopril 4,316 ± 1,180; p > 0.1).

Effect of Captopril on the Proliferation of HPP-CFCs Present in Nonadherent and Adherent Layers of LTBMCs
Treatment of LTBMCs with captopril for two weeks induced no significant change in the percentage of HPP-CFCs in S phase present in the nonadherent layer, as shown in Figure 3AGo. The proportion of HPP-CFCs in S phase was 40.8 ± 11% and 24.1 ± 9.5%, respectively, in the saline- and captopril-treated cultures. However, after three weeks of treatment with captopril, a significant inhibition of HPP-CFC proliferation from 24.1 ± 3.4% in the control cultures to only 6.6 ± 3.8% in the captopril-treated cultures (p < 0.05) was noted. At week 5, the proportion of HPP-CFCs in S phase in the control (47 ± 9.8%) and in the captopril-treated cultures (25.2 ± 10%) was not significantly different.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The effect of captopril on the proportion of HPP-CFCs in S phase present in (A) the nonadherent and (B) adherent layer of LTBMCs. Results represent the mean ± SE of four independent experiments. There was a significant difference in the proportion of HPP-CFCs in S phase in the nonadherent layer on week 3 of the captopril-treated group (*p < 0.05).

 
As for GM-CFC, six weeks of treatment of LTBMCs with captopril had no effect on the proportion of cycling HPP-CFCs in the adherent layers. As shown in Figure 3B, Go31.5 ± 4.4% and 23.3 ± 6.9% of HPP-CFCs were in S phase, respectively, in the saline- and captopril-treated cultures. Although there was an increase in cellularity of the adherent layer in the captopril-treated group, there was no statistically significant increase in the absolute numbers of HPP-CFC per flask (saline 2,212 ± 467 and captopril 2,190 ± 968; p > 0.1)


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hematological depression associated with the administration of ACEIs, although rare, is an important side effect of these drugs. The adverse effects of ACEI therapy are resolved rapidly after the drug is withdrawn. Therefore, the careful hematological surveillance of patients treated with ACEIs was suggested. In order to determine the mechanism of hematological toxicity induced by these drugs, we have evaluated the effects of captopril, one of the specific inhibitors of ACE, on hematopoiesis in LTBMCs. However, the standard method of feeding LTBMCs with half media change [8] was replaced by feeding with total media change. This procedure was carried out to ensure that a known concentration of captopril was available to cells at the beginning of each week of culture. In vitro hematopoiesis did not seem to be modified under these experimental conditions. Captopril was used at 10–6 M, as this concentration was shown to inhibit HPP-CFC-1 proliferation in preliminary studies.

The results reported here show that captopril did not reduce the nucleated cell number in the adherent as well as in nonadherent cell layers. However, it inhibited the proliferation of the nonadherent GM-CFCs and HPP-CFCs while it had no effect on the proliferative state of these cells present in the adherent layer of LTMBCs.

Captopril has been previously shown to decrease transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) receptor type I and II expression [17]. Thus, TGF-ß produced in LTBMC in the presence of captopril may be ineffective in regulating hemopoiesis. Captopril is also a potent free radical scavenger [18], and the suppressive effect of this drug on granulopoiesis has been attributed to its antioxidative characteristics [19]. Among the potential routes by which captopril could affect primitive hematopoietic cell proliferation, the control of AcSDKP level by this drug cannot be ignored.

The tetrapeptide AcSDKP belongs to a family of negative regulators of hematopoiesis [20]. It inhibits in vivo and in vitro the entry into S phase of human and murine stem cells and committed progenitors [20-22]. AcSDKP has recently been shown to be a physiological substrate of the N-terminal active site of ACE [23-25]. Thus, the presence of this tetrapeptide both in vitro and in vivo is largely preserved in the presence of ACEI [25-27]. Taking into consideration a steady-state production of AcSDKP in LTBMCs [28, 29] and the fact that ACE is produced by macrophages [30] which form a part of the adherent layer of LTBMCs [8], it is highly probable that captopril indirectly controls the proliferation of HPP-CFC and GM-CFC via the upregulation of the endogenous AcSDKP level. In fact, the inhibition of the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells and committed progenitors in LTBMCs treated with AcSDKP is well documented [31-33]. It has to be stressed that the observed absence of the inhibitory effect of captopril on the cells present in the adherent layer of LTBMCs is in total agreement with the data reported by Jackson et al. [33], who showed that AcSDKP prevented selectively the entry into S phase of HPP-CFCs present only in the nonadherent layer. Moreover, it has been reported previously that the concentration of AcSDKP is critical in obtaining a biological effect [21, 22], and particularly it has been shown that, in LTBMCs, an optimal concentration of AcSDKP is required to obtain the inhibition of HPP-CFC proliferation [33]. This may be the reason for the varying effects of captopril on HPP-CFC proliferation in LTBMCs throughout the treatment period. In fact, it cannot be excluded that the lack of inhibitory effect of captopril on HPP-CFC proliferation observed at weeks 2 and 5 is tightly linked with the number of macrophages purported to be the cell population secreting AcSDKP in LTBMC [29]. Since captopril efficiently blocks the catalytic activity of ACE present in culture medium with 20% HS and thus prevents the degradation of locally produced AcSDKP, no effect of this drug on the proliferative state of HPP-CFCs at week 2 of LTBMC could be due to the insufficient concentration of endogenous AcSDKP secreted by the low number of macrophages. However at week 5, when the increased number of macrophages is supposed to produce a higher concentration of AcSDKP, captopril had no inhibitory effect on HPP-CFC proliferation. Therefore, it is probable that only at week 3, when the optimal concentration of AcSDKP in LTBMC is available, that captopril can prevent HPP-CFC proliferation. The same explanation can be proposed for the description of the varying effect of captopril on GM-CFC proliferation. The results we have obtained with a biologically active analog of AcSDKP, the pseudopeptide AcSD{Psi}KP resistant to the proteolysis by ACE and thus stable in biological fluids [34], also support the hypothesis of the role of AcSDKP as a mediator of captopril antiproliferative activity. In fact, it has been demonstrated that AcSD{Psi}KP tested at the concentration 10–9 M, the dose defined previously as optimal for obtaining the inhibitory activity [35], was able to prevent the proliferation of HPP-CFC during the whole period studied from week 2 and to week 5 (data not shown).

In any case, the fact that the effect of captopril on HPP-CFC proliferation exhibited the same trend as the one observed with AcSDKP [31-33] strengthens the hypothesis of indirect control of hematopoietic cell proliferation by captopril. Thus, ACEI preventing the hydrolysis of endogenous AcSDKP in LTBMCs could maintain or upregulate the level of this tetrapeptide, which then exerts its antiproliferative effect. The close correlation between the enhanced plasma AcSDKP levels and the inhibition of HPP-CFC proliferation reported for irradiated mice given one dose of lisinopril, an alternative ACEI, is in agreement with such a hypothesis [36].

In conclusion, we have shown that the hematological depression induced in vivo by captopril, one of the specific inhibitors of ACE, could be due, at least in part, to inhibition of the proliferation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells by this drug. The reported antiproliferative effect of captopril also suggests its therapeutic application in vitro as an adjuvant to purging methods to prevent short-term myelotoxicity. To further assess the biological potential of captopril and to precisely define its mode of action, in vivo studies with this drug will be undertaken.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Katharina Broetz for her help in the typing of the manuscript, Dr. C. Peddie for critical review of the manuscript, and Ms. J. Melville for her technical support. We are grateful to the World Health Organization and CNRS/Royal Society for their financial support.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. van Brummelen P, Willemze R, Tan WD et al. Captopril-associated agranulocytosis. Lancet 1980;1:150.

  2. Casato M, Pucillo LP, Leoni M et al. Granulocytopenia after combined therapy with interferon and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: evidence for a synergistic hematological toxicity. Am J Med 1995;99:386-390.[Medline]

  3. Cooper RA. Captopril associated neutropenia. Who is at risk? Arch Intern Med 1983;143:659-660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Israeli A, Or R, Leitersdorf E. Captopril-associated transient aplastic anemia. Acta Haematol 1985;73:106-107.[Medline]

  5. Gavras I, Graff LG, Rose BD et al. Fatal pancytopenia associated with the use of captopril. Ann Intern Med 1981;94:58-59.

  6. Holland M, Stabie D, Shapiro W. Pancytopenia associated with administration of captopril to a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:1683-1686.[Medline]

  7. Salama A, Mueller-Eckhardt C. Immune-mediated blood cell dyscrasias related to drugs. Semin Hematol 1992;29:54-63.[Medline]

  8. Dexter TM. Haemopoiesis in long-term bone marrow cultures. Acta Haematol 1979;62:299-305.[Medline]

  9. Daniel CP, Ponting IL, Dexter TM. Growth and development of haemopoietic cells: a deterministic process? Hamatol Bluttransfus 1989;32:172-177.[Medline]

  10. Fibbe WE, van Damme J, Billiau A et al. Interleukin 1 induces human marrow stromal cells in long-term culture to produce granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood 1988;71:430-435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Eaves CJ, Cashman JD, Kay RJ et al. Mechanisms that regulate the cell cycle status of very primitive hematopoietic cells in long-term human marrow cultures. II. Analysis of positive and negative regulators produced by stromal cells within the adherent layer. Blood 1991;78:110-117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Herman P, Ferrant A, De Bruyere M et al. Stromal factors support the expansion of the whole hemopoietic spectrum from bone marrow CD34+DR cells and of some hemopoietic subset from CD34+ and CD34+DR+ cells. Leukemia 1998;12:735-745.[Medline]

  13. Cashman JD, Eaves AC, Wolpe S et al. Regulatory activity of endogenous MIP-1{alpha} in long-term cultures of human marrow. Prog Clin Biol Res 1994;389:261-268.[Medline]

  14. Cashman JD, Eaves CJ, Sarris AH et al. MCP-1, not MIP-1{alpha} is the endogenous chemokine which cooperates with TGFß to inhibit the cycling of primitive normal but not leukaemic (CLM) progenitors in long term human bone marrow cultures. Blood 1998;92:2338-2344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Cashman JD, Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. The tetrapeptide AcSDKP specifically blocks the cycling of primitive normal but not leukemic progenitors in long term culture: evidence for an indirect mechanism. Blood 1994;84:1534-1542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Robinson S, Lenfant M, Wdzieczak-Bakala J et al. The mechanism of action of the tetrapeptide Acetyl-N-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP) in the control of haematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Cell Prolif 1992;25:623-632.[Medline]

  17. Guh JY, Yang ML, Yang YL et al. Captopril reverses high-glucose-induced growth effects on LLC-PK1 cells partially by decreasing transforming growth factor-ß receptor protein expression. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:1207-1215.[Abstract]

  18. Bagchi D, Prasad R, Das DK. Direct scavenging of free radicals by captopril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1989;158:52-57.[Medline]

  19. Hammond WP, Miller JE, Starkebaum G et al. Suppression of in vitro granulocytopoiesis by captopril and penicillamine. Exp Hematol 1988;16:674-680.[Medline]

  20. Lenfant M, Wdzieczak-Bakala J, Guittet E et al. Inhibitor of hematopoietic stem cell proliferation: purification and determination of its structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:779-782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Guigon M, Bonnet D, Lemoine F et al. Inhibition of human bone marrow progenitors by the synthetic tetrapeptide AcSDKP. Exp Hematol 1990;18:1112-1115.[Medline]

  22. Bonnet D, Lemoine F, Pontvert-Delucq S et al. Direct and reversible inhibitory effect of the tetrapeptide Acetyl-N-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (Seraspenide) on the growth of human CD34+ subpopulations in response to growth factors. Blood 1993;82:3307-3314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Rousseau A, Michaud A, Chauvet MT et al. The hemoregulatory peptide N-acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro is a natural and specific substrate of the N-terminal active site of human angiotensin-converting enzyme. J Biol Chem 1995;270:3656-3661.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Michaud A, Williams TA, Chauvet MT et al. Substrate dependence of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition: captopril displays a partial selectivity for the inhibition of N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline hydrolysis compared with that of angiotensin I. Mol Pharmacol 1997;51:1070-1076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Azizi M, Rousseau A, Ezan E et al. Acute angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition increases the plasma levels of the natural stem cell regulator N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline. J Clin Invest 1996;97:839-844.[Medline]

  26. Azizi M, Ezan E, Nicolet L et al. High plasma level of N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline: a new marker of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Hypertension 1997;30:1015-1019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Comte L, Lorgeot V, Volkov L et al. Effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on blood haematopoietic progenitors and Acetyl-N-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro concentrations. Eur J Clin Invest 1997;27:788-790.[Medline]

  28. Wdzieczak-Bakala J, Fache MP, Lenfant M et al. AcSDKP, an inhibitor of CFU-S proliferation, is synthesized in mice under steady-state conditions and secreted by marrow in long-term culture. Leukemia 1990;4:235-237.[Medline]

  29. Li J, Volkov L, Comte L et al. Production and consumption of the tetrapeptide AcSDKP, a negative regulator of hematopoietic stem cells, by hematopoietic microenvironmental cells. Exp Hematol 1997;25:140-146.[Medline]

  30. Costerousse O, Allegrini J, Lopez M et al. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme in human circulating mononuclear cells: genetic polymorphism of expression in T-lymphocytes. Biochem J 1993;290:33-40.

  31. Bonnet D, Lemoine FM, Khoury E et al. Reversible inhibitory effects and absence of toxicity of tetrapeptide Acetyl-N-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP) in human long-term bone marrow culture. Exp Hematol 1992;20:1165-1169.[Medline]

  32. Hong D, Graham T, Ewel C et al. Inhibition of hematopoiesis in long-term cultures established on adherent layers from AcSDKP-treated dogs. Exp Hematol 1995;23:639-644.[Medline]

  33. Jackson JD, Yan Y, Ewel C et al. Activity of Acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP) on hematopoietic progenitor cells in short-term and long-term murine bone marrow cultures. Exp Hematol 1996;24:475-481.[Medline]

  34. Gaudron S, Adeline MT, Potier P et al. NAcSDKP analogues resistant to angiotensin-converting enzyme. J Med Chem 1997;40:3963-3968.[Medline]

  35. Gaudron S, Grillon C, Thierry J et al. In vitro effect of Acetyl-N-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP) analogues resistant to angiotensin I-converting enzyme on hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cell proliferation. STEM CELLS 1999;17:100-106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  36. Rousseau-Plasse A, Wdzieczak-Bakala J, Lenfant M et al. Lisinopril, an angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor, prevents in vivo the entry into cell cycle of murine hematopoietic stem cells following irradiation. Exp Hematol 1999;26:1074-1079.

accepted for publication on October 25, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
E. T. Zambidis, T. Soon Park, W. Yu, A. Tam, M. Levine, X. Yuan, M. Pryzhkova, and B. Peault
Expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme (CD143) identifies and regulates primitive hemangioblasts derived from human pluripotent stem cells
Blood, November 1, 2008; 112(9): 3601 - 3614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
U. Sharma, N.-E. Rhaleb, S. Pokharel, P. Harding, S. Rasoul, H. Peng, and O. A. Carretero
Novel anti-inflammatory mechanisms of N-Acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro in hypertension-induced target organ damage
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1226 - H1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
R. S Richmond, E A. Tallant, P. E Gallagher, C. M Ferrario, and W. B Strawn
Angiotensin II stimulates arachidonic acid release from bone marrow stromal cells
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2004; 5(4): 176 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Charrier, A. Michaud, S. Badaoui, S. Giroux, E. Ezan, F. Sainteny, P. Corvol, and W. Vainchenker
Inhibition of angiotensin I-converting enzyme induces radioprotection by preserving murine hematopoietic short-term reconstituting cells
Blood, August 15, 2004; 104(4): 978 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J.-M. Liu, F. Lawrence, M. Kovacevic, J. Bignon, E. Papadimitriou, J.-Y. Lallemand, P. Katsoris, P. Potier, Y. Fromes, and J. Wdzieczak-Bakala
The tetrapeptide AcSDKP, an inhibitor of primitive hematopoietic cell proliferation, induces angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo
Blood, April 15, 2003; 101(8): 3014 - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
K.E. Rodgers, S. Xiong, R. Steer, and G.S. diZerega
Effect of Angiotensin II on Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Proliferation
Stem Cells, July 1, 2000; 18(4): 287 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
W. B Strawn, R. H Dean, and C. M Ferrario
Novel mechanisms linking angiotensin II and early atherogenesis
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2000; 1(1): 11 - 17.
[PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chisi, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Riches, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chisi, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Riches, A. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS