Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, P. L.
Stem Cells, Vol. 18, No. 1, 63-64, January 2000
© 2000 AlphaMed Press


Fundamentals of Cancer Medicine

Eph Receptors and Ephrins

Paige L. Jensen

R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Paige L. Jensen, Ph.D., R&D Systems, Inc., 614 McKinley Place NE, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Telephone: 612-379-2956; Fax: 612-379-6580; email:paigej{at}rndsystems.com

The Eph family of receptors is the largest known sub-family of receptor tyrosine kinases [1, 2]. The ligands are called ephrins. The ephrin-Eph interactions are important in development, especially in cell-cell interactions involved in nervous system patterning (axon guidance), angiogenesis, and possibly in cancer [1-5]. Prior to the adaptation of a common nomenclature, the receptors and ligands had multiple names [6]. Recent reviews on Eph receptors and ephrin ligands have been performed [3, 7, 8].

The Eph name is derived from the cell line from which the first member was isolated, erythropoietin-producing human hepatocellular carcinoma line [6]. Eph receptors have been divided into two groups, designated EphA and EphB, on the basis of sequence homology [9]. The extracellular region contains an Ig domain at the amino terminus, a cysteine-rich region, and two fibronectin type III repeats near a single membrane-spanning region. The cytoplasmic region contains a highly conserved tyrosine kinase domain flanked by a juxtamembrane region and a carboxy-terminal tail [3].

The Eph ligands are called ephrins, derived from an abbreviation for Eph family receptor interacting proteins [6]. They are cell-surface associated proteins, and they naturally divide into two groups, ephrin-A and ephrin-B, based on structure and function. Ephrin-As are anchored to the cell via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) linkage [4, 6, 9], while ephrin-Bs are transmembrane proteins (Fig. 1) [4, 6, 9]. With few exceptions, EphA receptors bind ephrin-A and EphB receptors bind ephrin-B (Table 1Go) [3, 4, 6]. In vitro, each Eph receptor can bind multiple ligands and each ligand can bind multiple receptors [1, 3, 9]. In vivo, the receptors and ligands display reciprocal expression [3] and may display less promiscuous binding [7, 8].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Eph receptors and ligand specificities
 
Ligand binding results in Eph autophosphorylation on tyrosine and activation of receptor tyrosine kinase activity [9]. Only membrane-bound or Fc-clustered ligands are capable of activating the receptor in vitro [9, 10]. While soluble monomeric ligands bind the receptor, they do not induce receptor autophosphorylation and activation [10]. Several signaling molecules bind via their SH2 domain to the phosphorylated Eph receptor [3]. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity is increased in response to EphA2 receptor activation [3]. Ephrin-B ligands are also phosphorylated by an unidentified kinase upon binding the EphB receptor [3, 11]. The phosphorylated ephrin-B ligand can presumably interact with cellular signaling molecules [3, 11], providing a mechanism of bi-directional cell-cell signaling. However, detailed signaling pathways for the Eph receptors and ephrin-B ligands have not been elucidated.

Fc-clustered soluble ligand can cause the growth cones of cultured temporal retinal neurons, bearing the appropriate Eph receptor, to collapse [3]. The collapse of the growth cone is accompanied by disruption of the actin cytoskeleton within the growth cone [3, 12]. In Xenopus, ectopic expression of activated EphA4 resulted in decreased cell-cell adhesion. This decrease in cell-cell adhesion was possibly due to an effect on the function of cadherin [3, 13]. Additional observations suggest that Eph receptor-mediated cell-cell recognition can result in the nullification of cell-cell adhesion mechanisms [3]. Many cancers display overexpression of Eph receptors and/or ephrin ligands, possibly resulting in downregulation of cell adhesion when the Eph receptor and/or ephrin ligand on the tumor cell encounters the other on adjacent cells. This may then play a role in cancer metastasis [3].



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

 
References

  1. Drescher U. The Eph family in the patterning of neural development. Curr Biol 1997;7:R799-R807.[CrossRef][Medline]

  2. Tuzi NL, Gullick WJ. eph, the largest known family of putative growth factor receptors. Br J Cancer 1994;69:417-421.[Medline]

  3. Pasquale EB. The Eph family of receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1997;9:608-615.[CrossRef][Medline]

  4. Pandey A, Lindberg RA, Dixit VM. Cell signalling. Receptor orphans find a family. Curr Biol 1995;5:986-989.[CrossRef][Medline]

  5. Wang HU, Chen ZF, Anderson DJ. Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4. Cell 1998;93:741-753.[CrossRef][Medline]

  6. Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, the ephrins. Eph Nomenclature Committee (letter). Cell 1997;90:403-404.[CrossRef][Medline]

  7. O'Leary DD, Wilkinson DG. Eph receptors and ephrins in neural development. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999;9:65-73.[CrossRef][Medline]

  8. Bruckner K, Klein R. Signaling by Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998;8:375-382.[CrossRef][Medline]

  9. Gale NW et al. Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron 1996;17:9-19.[CrossRef][Medline]

  10. Davis S et al. Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 1994;266:816-819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Holland SJ et al. Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 1996;383:722-725.[CrossRef][Medline]

  12. Meima L et al. AL-1-induced growth cone collapse of rat cortical neurons is correlated with REK7 expression and rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. Eur J Neurosci 1997;9:177-188.[CrossRef][Medline]

  13. Winning RS, Scales JB, Sargent TD. Disruption of cell adhesion in Xenopus embryos by Pagliaccio, an Eph-class receptor tyrosine kinase. Dev Biol 1996;179:309-319.[CrossRef][Medline]

  14. Flanagan JG, Vanderhaeghen P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu Rev Neurosci 1998;21:309-345.[CrossRef][Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, P. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS