Stem Cells, Vol. 19, No. 5, 408-418,
September 2001
© 2001 AlphaMed Press
MicroSAGE Analysis of 2,353 Expressed Genes in a Single Cell-Derived Colony of Undifferentiated Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reveals mRNAs of Multiple Cell Lineages
Nicola Tremaina,
Jarmo Korkkoa,
David Ibbersona,
Gene C. Kopenb,
Carla DiGirolamoa,
Donald G. Phinneya
a Center for Gene Therapy, Tulane University of the Health Sciences, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA;
b Neuronyx Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA
Key Words. Mesenchymal stem cells • MicroSAGE
Correspondence:
Donald G. Phinney, Ph.D., Center for Gene Therapy and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, SL-99, Room 672 JBJ, Tulane University of the Health Sciences, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA. Telephone: 504-988-7725; Fax: 504-988-7710; e-mail: dphinne{at}tulane.edu
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from the bone marrow of adult organisms are capable of differentiating into adipocytes, chondrocytes, myoblasts, osteoblasts, and hematopoiesis-supporting stroma. We recently demonstrated that MSCs also adopt glial cell fates when transplanted into the developing central nervous system and hence can produce tissue elements derived from a separate embryonic layer. Despite these remarkable properties, it has been difficult to establish specific criteria to characterize MSCs. Using a modified protocol for micro-serial analysis of gene expression, we cataloged 2,353 unique genes expressed by a single cell-derived colony of undifferentiated human MSCs. This analysis revealed that the MSC colony simultaneously expressed transcripts characteristic of various mesenchymal cell lineages including chondrocytes, myoblasts, osteoblasts, and hematopoiesis-supporting stroma. Therefore, the profile of expressed transcripts reflects the developmental potential of the cells. Additionally, the MSC colony expressed mRNAs characteristic of endothelial, epithelial and neuronal cell lineages, a combination that provides a unique molecular signature for the cells. Other expressed transcripts included various products involved in wound repair as well as several neurotrophic factors. A total of 268 novel transcripts were also identified, one of which is the most abundantly expressed mRNA in MSCs. This study represents the first extensive gene expression analysis of MSCs and as such reveals new insight into the biology, ontogeny, and in vivo function of the cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Friedenstein and coworkers were the first to recognize that bone marrow contains an adherent, fibroblast-like population that under the appropriate conditions in vivo can generate the rudiments of normal bone, including cartilage, bone, adipose, and myelosupportive stroma [1, 2]. These findings suggested that the cells, referred to by Friedenstein as fibroblast colony-forming cells, represented osteogenic stem cells [3, 4]. Numerous studies employing the same adherent marrow fibroblasts, which have also been referred to as colony-forming units-fibroblast (CFU-F), marrow stromal cells, stromal stem cells, and mesenchymal progenitor cells have since confirmed and extended Friedenstein's original observations by demonstrating that the cells are capable of multilineage differentiation in vitro [5]. In particular, studies wherein clonogenic populations have been shown to exhibit tri- and quadripotential differentiation in vitro or produce in vivo a miniature ossicle that supports hematopoiesis have led to the current description of the cells as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [6-8]. This terminology more accurately reflects the biological potential of these cells and also distinguishes them from hematopoietic-supporting stromal cells.
Similar to hematopoietic stem cells, MSCs subsist in bone marrow in a mitotically quiescent state [9] and possess the capacity for self-renewal [10, 11]. MSCs also adopt glial cell fates in vivo [12] and hence can produce tissue elements that originate from a different embryonic layer, a property recently ascribed to neural stem cells [13]. Despite these remarkable properties, efforts aimed at defining phenotypic characteristics of MSCs have been confounded by the fact that the cells display a variety of morphologies [2, 14] and express various cell lineage-specific antigens that can vary between different preparations and as a function of time in culture, leading to differing conclusions about the biological nature of the cells. For example, several early studies showed that marrow stromal cells, one vernacularism for MSCs, expressed vimentin and smooth muscle actin [15], but under certain conditions also expressed desmin [16], indicating that the cells were most similar to vascular smooth muscle cells or marrow myoid cells, respectively. Alternatively, histological studies showed that marrow stromal cells surround the endothelium of venous sinuses indicating that they are analogous to vascular pericytes [17]. The analogy is noteworthy because pericytes are also oligopotential mesenchymal progenitors [18]. In other studies CFU-F, another MSC vernacularism, was reported to express factor VIII [19], laminin and type IV collagen [20] indicating that the cells are endothelial-like in origin. Finally, stromal stem cells, a third MSC synonym, were shown to colonize the embryonic liver, spleen, and bone marrow but not the yolk sac prior to establishment of hematopoiesis, suggesting that they are derived in the yolk sac from the hemangioblast [21].
More recent efforts to characterize MSCs have relied on analyzing the expression profiles of different gene families or classes of biological molecules. For example, human MSCs cultured under conditions that inhibit differentiation were shown to express numerous cytokines, including interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-11, G-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), stem cell factor, and leukemia inhibitory factor [22]. Similar experiments have analyzed the complement of expressed receptor tyrosine kinases [14] and insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins [23] in clonal and nonclonal populations of MSCs. Most recently, the expression profile of approximately 50 genes, including cytokine and mitogen receptors, matrix molecules, and integrins have been described on a homogenous preparation of human MSCs [7]. Although significant, these studies collectively do not provide an accurate molecular description of MSCs as the authors employed different preparations of cells cultured under different conditions. In no case has a broad sampling of expressed genes been simultaneously analyzed from a defined population of MSCs.
Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) provides a means to analyze the entire complement of expressed transcripts in a cell [24]. SAGE has been used to study genes involved in malignancy [25] and molecularly define the differentiation of blood monocytes into macrophages and dendritic cells [26, 27]. To better define the molecular phenotype of MSCs, we used a modified protocol for microSAGE [28] to rapidly catalog 2,353 mRNAs expressed by a single cell-derived colony of undifferentiated human MSCs. Our analysis demonstrates that a clonal population of human MSCs is molecularly heterogeneous, simultaneously expressing transcripts characteristic of various mesenchymal cell lineages. Other expressed transcripts, including epithelial, endothelial and neuronal lineage-specific mRNAs, neurotrophic factors, and products involved in wound healing, reveal new insight into the biology, ontogeny, and in vivo functions of MSCs.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Isolation and Culture of Human MSCs
Human MSCs were obtained from 20 ml aspirates from the iliac crest of normal donors. The mononuclear cell layer was recovered from a ficol (Ficoll-Plaque, Pharmacia; Peapack, NJ; http://www.pnu.com) gradient, washed in Hank's balanced salt solution, and then cultured in a 25 cm2 tissue culture flask (Falcon; Franklin Lakes, NJ) in
-minimal essential medium supplemented with 100 µg/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 20% fetal calf serum (Atlanta Biological; Norcross, GA; http://www.atlantabio.com/default.htm) lot selected for rapid growth of the cells. After 24 hours the nonadherent cells were removed and the adherent layer cultured until it reached 50%-70% confluence. Cells were then harvested by incubation with 0.2% trypsin-EDTA and their colony-forming efficiency determined by plating the cells at 10 cells/cm2 in 100 mm dishes (Falcon), culturing for 10 to 14 days, and then counting the number of visible colonies after staining the dishes with Geimsa. Colony-forming efficiency, which is calculated as the percentage of the number of cells initially plated that give rise to visible colonies, was previously shown to predict the life span and differentiation potential of the cells [29]. We screened various human donor populations to identify those with the highest colony-forming efficiency and used one such donor population to isolate single cell-derived colonies generated as described above and isolated using cloning cylinders and trypsin-EDTA.
MicroSAGE Procedure
Total RNA was prepared from a single cell-derived colony of human MSCs using the RNA Isolation Kit (Fluka; Milwaukee, WI; http://www.fluka.com/fluka), enriched for polyadenylated mRNA, converted into double-stranded cDNA, then reduced to 11 bp tags as previously described [28] with the following exceptions. First, all washes were done with 200 µl of buffer, and first-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out using murine moloney leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (RT) (GIBCO BRL; Gaithersburg, MD; http://www.tmc.tulane.edu/sif/tulgib.htm). Second, DNA linkers were ligated to the cDNA in a 50 µl reaction consisting of 1 µl (25 ng) linker A1/B1 and 1 µl (25 ng) linker A2/B2 and ligation was performed using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs; Beverly, MA; http://www.neb.com). The sequence of each oligonucleotide used to prepare the linkers was as follows; A1, 5'-TTCCCTTGGCTTCAGACCCTCAGACTAGGCTTAATAGGGA CATG-3'; B1, 5-TCCCTATTAAGCCTAGTCTGAGGGTCTGAAGCCAAGGG-3'; A2, 5'-TTTGCTCCAGTGCCTACCATCTACAACGATGTACGGGGACATG-3'; B2, 5'-TCCCCGTACATCGTTGTAGATGGTAGGCACTGGAGC-3'. Third, DNA precipitations were done in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2. Fourth, released cDNA fragments were blunt-ended using T4 DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). Fifth, to generate ditags, 1 µl of the diluted ligation reaction (1:50) was used as input in a 50 µl reaction containing 0.2 mM dNTPs, 525 ng of each primer and 1.5 units of thermostable DNA polymerase (Amplitaq Gold; Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA; http://home.appliedbiosystems.com) in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Buffer I (Applied Biosystems) that was amplified for 32 cycles of 30 sec at 95°C, 40 sec at 60°C and 40 sec at 72°C with an initial heat activation of the enzyme for 10 min at 95°C and a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. Primers used for PCR amplification of ditags were as follows: SGAb, 5'-CCCTTGGCTTCAGACCCTCAG-3'; SGBb, 5'-GCTCCAGTGCCGCCTACCATCTAC-3'. Ditags produced from 96 PCR reactions were isolated, cleaved with Nla III, and cloned into pZero (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA; http://www.invitrogen.com).
Sequencing and Analysis of Clones
Bacterial colonies were screened by blue/white selection to identify those that harbored vectors containing ditags. Plasmid DNA was then isolated using the QIAprep8 mini-prep kit (Qiagen; Valencia, CA; http://www.qiagen.com), sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Reaction kit (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed using a 377 ABI automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence files were analyzed using the SAGE program group [21].
cDNA Library Construction
Total RNA was isolated as described above from a pool of approximately 35 single cell-derived colonies elaborated from the same donor population of human MSCs as used for microSAGE. The cDNA library was constructed using the SMART® cDNA Library Construction Kit (GIBCO BRL). The resulting unamplified library contained approximately 1.6 x 106 independent clones. Following amplification, the library was aliquoted into pools of decreasing complexity to facilitate screening by PCR. Integrity of the cDNA library was measured using human control RT-PCR primers for genes of varying abundance (GIBCO BRL). To validate microSAGE tags, 50 µl of the primary pool of the amplified phage library was boiled for 5 minutes and then aliquots (1 µl) were used as input in PCR reactions (100 µl) containing 100 pmoles of forward and reverse gene-specific primers, 1x PCR buffer (Sigma; St. Louis, MO; http://www.sigma-aldrich.com), 0.2 mM dNTPs (Sigma), and 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Sigma). After an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 minutes, reactions were amplified for 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°-65°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 90 seconds, followed by a final incubation at 72°C for 5 minutes. PCR products were electrophoresed through a 1% agarose gel, excised from the gel and purified using GeneElute columns (Sigma), and then cloned using the AdvanTAge PCR cloning kit (Clontech; Palo Alto, CA; http://www.clontech.com). Plasmid DNA was isolated and sequenced as described above to confirm the identity of each product.
Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) Analysis
Single cell-derived colonies of human MSCs were pooled, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and counted using a hemocytometer. Aliquots of approximately 2 x 105 cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 500 g for 5 minutes and resuspended in 100 µl of the appropriate antibody for flow cytometry. Monoclonal antibodies (PharMingen; http://www.pharmingen.com) were used for cell surface labeling at a concentration of 5 µg/100 µl in Antibody Diluent (Dako; Carpinteria, CA). Analysis of CD121a expression was done by indirect immunofluorescence using a rat antihuman antibody (PharMingen) and cytokeratin expression measured using a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated pan cytokeratin antibody (Sigma). Isotype controls (PharMingen) for each antibody were run in parallel at the same concentration used for each antibody. Cell labeling was evaluated by FACS analysis (Becton Dickinson; San José, CA; http://www.bd.com).
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Modifications to the MicroSAGE Protocol
To isolate a single cell-derived colony of human MSCs, we screened donor populations using a simple colony-forming assay [29] to identify those that are highly replicative and capable of multilineage differentiation. A single cell-derived colony was isolated from one selected donor population by plating the cells at approximately 10 cells/cm2 and culturing for 10 days. The colony, which consisted of approximately 10,000 cells, was then isolated using cloning rings and trypsin-EDTA. PolyA+ mRNA isolated from this colony was converted to a population of 11 bp DNA tags using the microSAGE [28] protocol modified in the following ways. First, the sequence of the DNA linkers and corresponding PCR primers used to generate the ditags was altered, which resulted in higher yields of ditag material in the PCR. Increased product yields reduced the number of amplification cycles needed to generate sufficient ditags for cloning from a maximum of 46 to only 32 (Table 1
). Second, a 20-fold lower molar concentration of linkers for ligation to the double-stranded cDNA was used, which significantly reduced the amount of linker molecules carried through the remaining procedure. The linker molecules reduce the yield of ditags in the PCR by competing for the primers. Linkers also reduce the cloning efficiency of the ditags by ligating to and terminating the concatenation of the molecules. Finally, ditag ends were blunted with T4 DNA polymerase to prevent the addition of extra non-templated nucleotides during nick translation [30], which can also poison the cloning reaction. These modifications allowed us to rapidly generate 17,767 tags using material pooled from only 96 PCR reactions amplified a total of 32 cycles, an improvement in yield compared to previous published protocols (Fig. 1
, Table 1
).

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. MicroSAGE analysis of a single cell-derived colony of human MSCs. MicroSAGE was performed on a single human MSC colony, generating the characteristic 102 bp ditag PCR product, which was cleaved to a 26 bp fragment with Nla III. After concatenation, the products were cloned and sequenced, producing the characteristic 11 bp ditags (red arrows) separated by the Nla III recognition sequence (black line).
|
|
MicroSAGE Tag Abundance
Out of the 2,353 unique genes identified, 1,183 represent known transcripts, 323 map to more than one gene, 578 are expressed sequence tags and 268 are unidentifiable. Table 2
shows the 50 most abundant genes expressed by an MSC colony, some of which are represented by more than one tag. The most abundant transcript detected, which accounts for 3.5% of all tags, represents a novel sequence. Overall, a total of 10 (20%) of the top 50 genes are unidentifiable or cannot be assigned specifically to a single gene. In contrast, 17 of the top 50 tags (34%) represent ribosomal proteins and 23 tags (46%) represent known genes. The latter include products characteristic of mesenchymal cells and previously identified in MSCs, such as vimentin and fibronectin [31], collagen type I and III [32], osteoblast-specific factor 2 [33] and collagen type VI [34]. Other abundant transcripts atypical of mesenchymal cells and not previously described in MSCs include two products highly expressed in neurons, the 2C subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor and glia-derived nexin 1 alpha [35], as well as keratin 8, a characteristic member of the large intermediate filament gene family expressed in epithelial cells [36].
A Single MSC Colony Expresses mRNAs of Multiple Cell Lineages
When all 1,183 known transcripts were analyzed according to their cellular origin, an interesting pattern of gene expression emerged. The MSC colony simultaneously expressed mRNAs common to or characteristic of different mesenchymal cell lineages, including osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and myoblasts (Fig. 2
). Included among these transcripts of cell differentiation are early markers, such as cbfa1 [37] and fibromudullin [38], and late markers, such as meltrin-alpha [39] and sarcoglycan [40]. The colony also expressed products characteristic of hematopoiesis-supporting stroma, including fibulin-1 and fibulin-2 [41], tenascin-C [42], collagen type VI [34], stromal cell-derived factor 1 [43], and pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor [44]. Collectively, these data indicate that even in the absence of external cues, MSCs cultured in vitro express characteristics of differentiated mesenchymal cell lineages. These results are consistent with previous reports indicating that human MSC populations are both molecularly and functionally heterogeneous [45, 46].

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Transcript profile of a single cell-derived colony of human MSCs. Transcripts represented in the microSAGE database that are prevalent within or characteristic of a specific tissue or cell type were segregated accordingly, revealing that the MSC colony shares features with osteoblasts, chondrocytes, myoblasts, hematopoiesis-supporting stroma, endothelial cells, and neuronal cells.
|
|
As noted above, the MSC colony also expressed many transcripts atypical of mesenchymal cells. These include mRNAs characteristic of epithelial and endothelial cells, including keratin 8, keratin 10, epican [47], vascular endothelial growth factor [48], low-density lipoprotein receptor [49], and collagen type IV (Fig. 2
). MSCs also expressed transcripts common to neuronal tissues, such as neurofilament H [50], the high affinity nerve growth factor receptor, glial-derived nexin 1 alpha [35] as well as several neurotrophic factors. Additionally, MSCs expressed high levels of actin together with other peptides involved in actin polymerization/depolymerization, suggesting that the cells are highly motile. Although it is undetermined whether these results imply that MSCs migrate to extra-hematopoietic sites via the circulation, the cells also express several products that play a role in wound repair. These include fibrillin-1, a major contributor to dermal elastic fiber construction during wound repair [51]; dermatopontin, a recently discovered extracellular matrix protein associated with the pathogenesis of fibrosis in hypertrophic scar and systemic sclerosis [52]; thymosin ß-4, which exhibits angiogenic properties, accelerates re-epithelialization, and induces migration of keratinocytes [53], and macrophage migration inhibitory factor, a cytokine shown to participate in wound repair [54].
Validation of MicroSAGE Tags
To validate tags we constructed a cDNA library from a pool of CFU-Fs generated from the same marrow donor and cultured under identical conditions. Screening for the presence of ubiquitous transcripts of varying abundance validated the integrity of the cDNA library (Fig. 3
). DNA prepared from the phage library was used as input in PCR reactions containing primers corresponding to genes represented by SAGE tags. Excluding ribosomal proteins, we validated many tags (Table 2
and Fig. 2
) with the exception of the N-methyl-D-aspartate 2C glutamate receptor (Fig. 4
). Multiple attempts using different primer sets spanning the coding region of this receptor failed to identify any transcripts in the cDNA library, but all successfully amplified the correct DNA fragment from human brain RNA. Therefore, this tag apparently is not unique and likely represents a novel transcript. Some tags were also validated by detection of the corresponding expressed protein using immunocytochemistry (data not shown). Finally, a total of 11 cluster designation (CD) antigens are also included in the database. Expression of each CD antigen was validated by flow cytometry using pools of MSC colonies as source material (Fig. 5
). All cells in the population expressed only two of the antigens, CD44 and CD59, providing further evidence that the single cell-derived MSC colony is molecularly heterogeneous.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Validation of the human MSC cDNA library. Phage DNA prepared from the MSC cDNA library was used as input in PCR reactions containing primers corresponding to ubiquitously expressed transcripts of high, medium, and low abundance. ARF1 = ADP-ribosylation factor 1; ARF3 = ADP-ribosylation factor 3; PP1 = protein phosphatase 1; OD = ornithine decarboxylase.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Validation of microSAGE tags by PCR screening of an MSC cDNA library. Phage DNA prepared from the MSC cDNA library was used as input in PCR reactions containing primers corresponding to various microSAGE tags. PCR products were isolated by agarose gel electrophoresis, cloned, and sequenced to verify their identity. IGFBP3 = insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3; Cbfa1 = core-binding factor 1; MIF = macrophage migration inhibitory factor; PEDF = pigment epithelium-derived factor; FKBP38 = FK506 binding protein; NMDA-2C = N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor 2C.
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Validation of microSAGE tags by FACS analysis. Pooled human MSC colonies derived from the same donor as used for microSAGE were incubated with the indicated antibodies, and the percentage of cells in the population expressing each particular antigen was analyzed by FACS.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
In this report we used a modified microSAGE protocol to analyze the transcript profile of a single cell-derived colony of human MSCs cultured under conditions that prevent differentiation. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed that the colony simultaneously expressed mRNAs characteristic of various committed mesenchymal cell lineages. One explanation for these findings is that cells within the colony individually entered into distinct differentiation programs, leading to the generation of a molecularly heterogeneous population. Because these events occurred in the absence of external cues, fate determination in MSCs may be governed by an intrinsic mechanism similar to that described for neural [55] and hematopoietic [56, 57] stem cells. SAGE analysis of multiple colonies derived from different donors is needed to confirm whether lineage commitment is mediated by a selective or instructive mechanism in cultured MSCs.
In addition to mesenchymal lineage-specific transcripts, MSCs also expressed mRNAs common to neural tissues. It is unclear whether expression of these transcripts reflects the entry of MSCs into a developmental program that specifies neural cell fates. Previous studies have shown that MSCs can adopt glial and neuronal cell fates in vivo [12]. Alternatively, mesenchymal cells have previously been reported to express products common to neuronal cells, including neurofilaments and excitatory amino acid receptors [58, 59]. Therefore, expression by MSCs may reflect an important but ill-defined role for these products in connective tissues.
We also detected expression of several neurotrophic factors by the MSC colony, including pigment epithelial-derived factor, glial-derived nexin 1
, and macrophage migration inhibitory factor. These products have been shown to promote neuronal cell survival [60, 61] as well as induce neurite outgrowth in cultured neurons [62, 63]. Expression of these products may explain why MSCs transplanted into the central nervous system improve functional recovery of mice following induction of stroke [64]. Previous studies have documented that dense innervation by nerve fibers in bone marrow lies in intimate association with marrow stromal cells [65]. Accordingly, we hypothesize that MSCs normally produce the neurotrophic factors identified by SAGE to promote and maintain nervous innervation into bone and bone marrow [66] and augment the ramification of fibers during periods of growth and reparation due to injury. Interestingly, efferent sympathetic nerve activity has been shown to regulate the mobilization and proliferation of hematopoietic cells [65, 67]. Possibly, similar signals released locally may impinge upon MSCs and control various aspects of their function, including those that affect hematopoiesis.
Another unique characteristic revealed by our microSAGE analysis is the expression by MSCs of mRNAs common to endothelial and epithelial cells. Simultaneous coexpression of cytokeratins, vascular markers, and mesenchymal antigens is also a distinguishing feature of mesothelial cells. Recent studies suggest that aspects of the splanchnic mesothelium undergo an epithelial to mesenchymal transition during embryogenesis, producing a pluripotential mesenchyme that yields HSCs, angioblasts, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts [49]. This secondary mesenchyme transiently expresses epithelial, endothelial, and mesenchymal antigens. Therefore, MSCs may be an adult remnant of this embryonic tissue and as such retain a stem cell-like phenotype. A mesothelial origin of MSCs is also supported by the fact that mesothelial tumors typically consist of a mixture of two cell types, spindle-shaped mesenchymal stromal cells and epithelial-like cells [68]. Finally, transient expression of cytokeratins also occurs in blastemal cells of the regenerating newt limb and is thought to maintain the cells in an undifferentiated and proliferative state [69]. Therefore, cytokeratin expression may be a common feature of primitive mesenchyme and reflect the stem cell nature of MSCs.
 |
SUMMARY
|
|---|
Collectively, the demonstration that a single cell-derived colony of human MSCs simultaneously expressed mRNAs of multiple cell lineages provides further evidence for the stem-like nature of the cells and clarifies why attempts to categorize the cells have been confusing. Additionally, many of the transcripts identified have not been previously described in MSCs and therefore may represent useful tools to further study their biology. Continued molecular analysis will likely reveal novel aspects of MSC biology that can be exploited to treat injury and disease.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
|
|---|
The authors would like to thank Dr. Darwin J. Prockop for support and advice with this research project. The National Institute of Health (R01-AR44210-01A1), the Louisiana Gene Therapy Research Consortium (New Orleans, LA), and HCA-the Health Care Company (Nashville, TN) supported part of this research.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI et al. Heterotopic transplants of bone marrow: analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation 1968;6:230247.[Medline]
-
Friedenstein AJ. Precursor cells of mechanocytes. Int Rev Cytol 1976;47:327345.[Medline]
-
Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhyan RK, Gerasimov UV. Bone marrow osteogenic stem cells: in vitro cultivation and transplantation into diffusion chambers. Cell Tissue Kinet 1987;20:263272.[Medline]
-
Owen M, Friedenstein AJ. Stromal stem cells: marrow-derived osteogenic precursors. Ciba Found Symp 1998;136:4260.
-
Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science 1997;276:7174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dennis JE, Merriam A, Awadallah A et al. A quadripotential mesenchymal progenitor cell isolated from the marrow of an adult mouse. J Bone Miner Res 1999;14:700709.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC et al. Multilineage potential of human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kuznetsov SA, Kresbach PH, Kazuhito S et al. Single-colony derived strains of human marrow stromal fibroblasts form bone after transplantation in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:13351347.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Falla N, Van Vlasselaer P, Bierkens J et al. Characterization of a 5-fluorouracil-enriched osteoprogenitor population of the murine bone marrow. Blood 1993;82:35803591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bruder SP, Fink DJ, Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells in bone development, bone repair, and skeletal regeneration therapy. J Cell Biochem 1994;56:283294.[Medline]
-
Colter DC, Class R, DiGirolamo CM et al. Rapid expansion of recycling stem cells in cultures of plastic-adherent cells from human bone marrow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:32133218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kopen GC, Prockop DJ, Phinney DG. Marrow stromal cells migrate throughout forebrain and cerebellum, and they differentiate into astrocytes after injection into neonatal mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:1071110716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bjornson CR, Rietze RL, Reynolds BA et al. Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in vivo. Science 1999;283:534537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Satomura K, Derubeis AR, Fedarko NS et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase expression in human bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Physiol 1998;177:426438.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Charbord P, Lerat H, Newton I et al. The cytoskeleton of stromal cells from human bone marrow cultures resemble that of cultured smooth muscle cells. Exp Hematol 1990;18:276282.[Medline]
-
Bonanno E, Ercoli L, Missori P et al. Homogeneous stromal cell population from normal human adult bone marrow expressing
-smooth muscle actin filaments. Lab Invest 1994;71:308310.[Medline]
-
Weiss L. The hematopoietic microenvironment of bone marrow: an ultrastructural study of the stroma in rats. Anat Rec 1976;186:161184.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Doherty MJ, Canfield AE. Gene expression during vascular pericyte differentiation. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 1999;9:117.[Medline]
-
Hasthorpe S, Bogdanovski M, Rogerson J et al. Characterization of endothelial cells in murine long-term marrow culture. Implication for hemopoietic regulation. Exp Hematol 1992;20:476481.[Medline]
-
Perkins S, Fleishman RA. Stromal cell progeny of murine bone marrow fibroblast colony-forming units are clonal endothelial-like cells that express collagen IV and laminin. Blood 1990;75:620625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Van Den Heuvel RL, Versele SRM, Schoeters GER et al. Stromal stem cells (CFU-F) in yolk sac, liver, spleen and bone marrow of pre- and post-natal mice. Br J Haematol 1987;66:1520.[Medline]
-
Haynesworth SE, Baber MA, Caplan AI. Cytokine expression by human marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells in vitro: effects of dexamethasone and IL-1ß. J Cell Physiol 1996;166:585592.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Grellier P, Yee D, Gonzalez M et al. Characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP) and regulation of IGFBP-4 in bone marrow stromal cells. Br J Haematol 1995;90:249257.[Medline]
-
Velculescu VE, Zhang L, Vogelstein B et al. Serial analysis of gene expression. Science 1995;270:484487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhang L, Zhou W, Velculescu VE et al. Gene expression profiles in normal and cancer cells. Science 1997;276:12681272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hashimoto S, Suzuki T, Dong HY et al. Serial analysis of gene expression in human monocytes and macrophages. Blood 1999;94:837844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hashimoto S, Suzuki T, Dong HY et al. Serial analysis of gene expression in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Blood 1999;94:845852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Datson NA, van der Perk-de Jong J, van der Berg MP et al. MicroSAGE: a modified procedure for serial analysis of gene expression in limited amounts of tissue. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:13001307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DiGirolamo CM, Stokes D, Colter D et al. Propagation and senescence of human marrow stromal cells in culture: a simple colony-forming assay identifies samples with the greatest potential to propagate and differentiate. Br J Haematol 1999;107:275281.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Hu G. DNA polymerase-catalyzed addition of nontemplated extra nucleotides to the 3' end of a DNA fragment. DNA Cell Biol 1993;12:763770.[Medline]
-
Li J, Sensebe L, Herve P et al. Nontransformed colony-derived stromal cell lines from normal human marrows. II. Phenotypic characterization and differentiation pathway. Exp Hematol 1995;23:133141.[Medline]
-
Castro-Malaspina H, Gay RE, Resnick G et al. Characterization of human bone marrow fibroblast colony-forming cells (CFU-F) and their progeny. Blood 1980;56:289301.[Free Full Text]
-
Satomura K, Krebsbach PA, Bianco P et al. Osteogenic imprinting upstream of marrow stromal cell differentiation. J Cell Biochem 2000;78:391403.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Klein G, Muller CA, Tillet E et al. Collagen type VI in the human bone marrow microenvironment: a strong cytoadhesive component. Blood 1995;86:17401748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Simpson CS, Johnston HM, Morris BJ. Neuronal expression of protease-nexin 1 mRNA in rat brain. Neurosci Lett 1994;170:286290.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Oshima RG, Baribault H, Caulin C. Oncogenic regulation and function of keratins 8 and 18. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1996;15:445471.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V et al. Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell 1997;89:747754.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Murphy JM, Heinegard R, McIntosh A et al. Distribution of cartilage molecules in the developing mouse joint. Matrix Biol 1999;18:487497.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Harris HA, Murrills RJ, Komm BS. Expression of metrin-alpha mRNA is not restricted to fusagenic cells. J Cell Biochem 1997;67:136142.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Hack AA, Groh ME, McNally EM. Sarcoglycans in muscular dystrophy. Microsc Res Tech 2000;48:167180.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Gu YC, Nilsson K, Hubert E et al. Association of extracellular matrix proteins fibulin-1 and fibulin-2 with fibronectin in bone marrow stroma. Br J Haematol 2000;109:305313.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Ohta M, Sakai T, Saga Y et al. Suppression of hematopoietic activity in tenascin-C deficient mice. Blood 1998;91:40744083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
D'Apuzzo M, Rolnik A, Loetscher M et al. The chemokine SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor 1, attracts early stage B cell precursors via the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Eur J Immunol 1997;27:17881793.[Medline]
-
Samal B, Sun Y, Stearns G et al. Cloning and characterization of the cDNA encoding a novel human pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor. Mol Cell Biol 1994;14:14311437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kuznetsov SA, Kresbach PH, Kazuhito S et al. Single-colony derived strains of human marrow stromal fibroblasts form bone after transplantation in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:13351347.
-
Phinney DG, Kopen G, Righter W et al. Donor variation in the growth properties and osteogenic potential of human marrow stromal cells. J Cell Biochem 1999;75:424436.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Van Hal NL, Van Dongen GA, Ten Brink CB et al. Sequence variation in the monoclonal-antibody-U36-defined CD44v6 epitope. Cancer Immunol Immunother 1997;45:8892.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Thomas KA. Vascular endothelial growth factor, a potent and selective angiogenic agent. J Biol Chem 1996;271:603606.[Free Full Text]
-
Munoz-Chapuli R, Perez-Pomares JM, Macias D et al. Differentiation of hemangioblasts from embryonic mesothelial cells? A model on the origin of the vertebrate cardiovascular system. Differentiation 1996;64:133141.
-
Lee MK, Cleveland DW. Neuronal intermediate filaments. Ann Rev Neurosci 1996;19:187217.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Ashcroft GS, Kielty CM, Horan MA et al. Age-related changes in the temporal and spatial distributions of fibrillin and elastin mRNAs and proteins in acute cutaneous wounds of healthy humans. J Pathol 1997;183:8089.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Kuroda K, Okamoto O, Shinkai H. Dermatopontin expression is decreased in hypertrophic scar and systemic sclerosis skin fibroblasts and is regulated by transforming growth factor-beta 1, Interleukin-4, and matrix collagen. J Invest Dermatol 1999;112:706710.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Malinda KM, Sidhu GS, Mani H et al. Thymosin ß-4 accelerates wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 1999;113:364368.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Nishihira J. Novel pathophysiological aspects of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Int J Mol Med 1998;2:1728.[Medline]
-
Johe K, Hazel TG, Muller T et al. Single factors direct the differentiation of stem cells from the fetal and adult central nervous system. Genes Dev 1996;10:31293140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haung S, Law P, Francis K et al. Symmetry of initial cell divisions among primitive hematopoietic progenitors is independent of ontogenic age and regulatory molecules. Blood 1999;94:25952604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ogawa M. Stochastic model revisited. Int J Hematol 1999;69:25.[Medline]
-
Egerbacher M, Krestan R, Bock P. Morphology, histochemistry, and differentiation of the cat's epiglottic cartilage: a supporting organ composed of elastic cartilage, fibrous cartilage, myxoid tissue, and fat tissue. Anat Rec 1995;242:471482.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Sainio K, Nonclereq D, Saarma M et al. Neuronal characteristics in embryonic renal stroma. Int J Dev Biol 1994;38:7784.[Medline]
-
Fujimoto S. Identification of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in rat spinal cord and its kinetics on experimental spinal cord injury. Hokkaido Igaka Zasshi 1997;72:409430.
-
Houenou LJ, Turner PL, Li L. A serine protease inhibitor, protease nexin I, rescues motor neurons from naturally occurring and axotomy-induced cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:895899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Monard D, Niday E, Limat A et al. Inhibition of protease activity can lead to neurite extension in neuroblastoma cells. Prog Brain Res 1983;58:359364.[Medline]
-
Houenou LJ, D'Costa AP, Li L et al. Pigment epithelium-derived factor promotes the survival and differentiation of developing spinal motor neurons. J Comp Neurol 1999;412:506514.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Li Y, Chopp M, Chen J et al. Intrastitial transplantation of bone marrow nonhematopoietic cells improves functional recovery after stroke in adult mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabol 2000;20:13111319.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Afan AM, Broome CS, Nicholls SE et al. Bone marrow innervation regulates cellular retention in the murine hematopoietic system. Br J Haematol 1997;98:569577.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Tabarowski Z, Gibson-Berry K, Felten SY. Noradrenergic and peptidergic innervation of the mouse femur bone marrow. Acta Histochem 1996;98:453457.[Medline]
-
Miyan JA, Broome CS, Afan AM. Coordinated host defense through an integration of the neural, immune, and hematopoietic systems. Domest Anim Endocrinol 1998;15:297304.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Kannerstein M, Churg J. Peritoneal mesotheliomas. Hum Pathol 1977;8:8394.[Medline]
-
Corcoran JP, Ferretti P. Keratin 8 and 18 expression in mesenchymal progenitor cells of regenerating limbs is associated with cell proliferation and differentiation. Dev Dyn 1997;210:355370.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received on January 18, 2001;
accepted for publication on June 8, 2001.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Delorme, J. Ringe, C. Pontikoglou, J. Gaillard, A. Langonne, L. Sensebe, D. Noel, C. Jorgensen, T. Haupl, and P. Charbord
Specific Lineage-Priming of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Provides the Molecular Framework for Their Plasticity
Stem Cells,
May 1, 2009;
27(5):
1142 - 1151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kubo, M. Shimizu, Y. Taya, T. Kawamoto, M. Michida, E. Kaneko, A. Igarashi, M. Nishimura, K. Segoshi, Y. Shimazu, et al.
Identification of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-transcription factors by microarray and knockdown analyses, and signature molecule-marked MSC in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry
Genes Cells,
March 1, 2009;
14(3):
407 - 424.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Licheng Tan, Yiwang Chen, Yang Wang, Weihua Zhou, Xiangjun Zhu, Xiaohui He, Jiying Su, and Suping Cui
In Vivo Evaluation of Butylene Terephthalate-ethylene Oxide-DL, Lactide Polymer as Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers,
January 1, 2009;
24(1):
43 - 55.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Summer and A. Fine
Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell Research: Limitations and Recommendations
Proceedings of the ATS,
August 15, 2008;
5(6):
707 - 710.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Tayyareci, M. Sezer, B. Umman, S. Besisik, A. Mudun, Y. Sanli, A. Oncul, N. Gurses, D. Sargin, M. Meric, et al.
Intracoronary Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cell Transplantation Improves Coronary Collateral Vessel Formation and Recruitment Capacity in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Combined Hemodynamic and Scintigraphic Approach
Angiology,
May 1, 2008;
59(2):
145 - 155.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. A. Isakova, K. Baker, M. DuTreil, J. Dufour, D. Gaupp, and D. G. Phinney
Age- and Dose-Related Effects on MSC Engraftment Levels and Anatomical Distribution in the Central Nervous Systems of Nonhuman Primates: Identification of Novel MSC Subpopulations That Respond to Guidance Cues in Brain
Stem Cells,
December 1, 2007;
25(12):
3261 - 3270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Tao, C.-P. Lau, H.-F. Tse, and G.-R. Li
Functional ion channels in mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
November 1, 2007;
293(5):
C1561 - C1567.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Phinney and D. J. Prockop
Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem/Multipotent Stromal Cells: The State of Transdifferentiation and Modes of Tissue Repair Current Views
Stem Cells,
November 1, 2007;
25(11):
2896 - 2902.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Ortiz, M. DuTreil, C. Fattman, A. C. Pandey, G. Torres, K. Go, and D. G. Phinney
Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist mediates the antiinflammatory and antifibrotic effect of mesenchymal stem cells during lung injury
PNAS,
June 26, 2007;
104(26):
11002 - 11007.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Tomita, T. Mori, K. Maruyama, T. Zahir, M. Ward, A. Umezawa, and M. J. Young
A Comparison of Neural Differentiation and Retinal Transplantation with Bone Marrow-Derived Cells and Retinal Progenitor Cells
Stem Cells,
October 1, 2006;
24(10):
2270 - 2278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. N. Olivier, A. C. Rybicki, and E. E. Bouhassira
Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells into Bipotent Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Stem Cells,
August 1, 2006;
24(8):
1914 - 1922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Song, N. E. Webb, Y. Song, and R. S. Tuan
Identification and Functional Analysis of Candidate Genes Regulating Mesenchymal Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Multipotency
Stem Cells,
July 1, 2006;
24(7):
1707 - 1718.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Gregory, J. Ylostalo, and D. J. Prockop
Adult Bone Marrow Stem/Progenitor Cells (MSCs) Are Preconditioned by Microenvironmental "Niches" in Culture: A Two-Stage Hypothesis for Regulation of MSC Fate
Sci. Signal.,
July 26, 2005;
2005(294):
pe37 - pe37.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Egusa, F. E. Schweizer, C.-C. Wang, Y. Matsuka, and I. Nishimura
Neuronal Differentiation of Bone Marrow-derived Stromal Stem Cells Involves Suppression of Discordant Phenotypes through Gene Silencing
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 24, 2005;
280(25):
23691 - 23697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Katz, A. Tholpady, S. S. Tholpady, H. Shang, and R. C. Ogle
Cell Surface and Transcriptional Characterization of Human Adipose-Derived Adherent Stromal (hADAS) Cells
Stem Cells,
March 1, 2005;
23(3):
412 - 423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Rao and S. L. Stice
Gene Expression Profiling of Embryonic Stem Cells Leads to Greater Understanding of Pluripotency and Early Developmental Events
Biol Reprod,
December 1, 2004;
71(6):
1772 - 1778.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kinnaird, E. Stabile, M. S. Burnett, and S. E. Epstein
Bone Marrow-Derived Cells for Enhancing Collateral Development: Mechanisms, Animal Data, and Initial Clinical Experiences
Circ. Res.,
August 20, 2004;
95(4):
354 - 363.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D'Ippolito, S. Diabira, G. A. Howard, P. Menei, B. A. Roos, and P. C. Schiller
Marrow-isolated adult multilineage inducible (MIAMI) cells, a unique population of postnatal young and old human cells with extensive expansion and differentiation potential
J. Cell Sci.,
June 15, 2004;
117(14):
2971 - 2981.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Oswald, S. Boxberger, B. Jorgensen, S. Feldmann, G. Ehninger, M. Bornhauser, and C. Werner
Mesenchymal Stem Cells Can Be Differentiated Into Endothelial Cells In Vitro
Stem Cells,
May 1, 2004;
22(3):
377 - 384.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. G. Sylvester and M. T. Longaker
Stem Cells: Review and Update
Arch Surg,
January 1, 2004;
139(1):
93 - 99.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Tintut, Z. Alfonso, T. Saini, K. Radcliff, K. Watson, K. Bostrom, and L. L. Demer
Multilineage Potential of Cells From the Artery Wall
Circulation,
November 18, 2003;
108(20):
2505 - 2510.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. Silva Jr., D. T. Covas, R. A. Panepucci, R. Proto-Siqueira, J. L.C. Siufi, D. L. Zanette, A. R.D. Santos, and M. A. Zago
The Profile of Gene Expression of Human Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Stem Cells,
November 1, 2003;
21(6):
661 - 669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Spees, S. D. Olson, J. Ylostalo, P. J. Lynch, J. Smith, A. Perry, A. Peister, M. Y. Wang, and D. J. Prockop
Differentiation, cell fusion, and nuclear fusion during ex vivo repair of epithelium by human adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma
PNAS,
March 4, 2003;
100(5):
2397 - 2402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|