Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kakizoe, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kakizoe, T.

Stem Cells 2002;20:448-459 www.StemCells.com
© 2002 AlphaMed Press

The Role of PGE2 in the Differentiation of Dendritic Cells: How Do Dendritic Cells Influence T-Cell Polarization and Chemokine Receptor Expression?

Je-Jung Leea,b, Masao Takeic, Shinichi Horib, Yoshiko Inoued, Yukie Haradab, Ryuji Tanosakib, Yoshinobu Kandab, Masayuki Kamib, Atsushi Makimotob, Shin Mineishib, Hiroyuki Kawaic, Akihiro Shimosakac, Yuji Heiked, Yoshinori Ikarashid, Hiro Wakasugid, Yoichi Takaueb, Tai-Ju Hwange, Hyeoung-Joon Kima, Tadao Kakizoef

a Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
b Division of Transplantation/Immunotherapy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
c Kirin Brewery Company, Tokyo, Japan;
d Pharmacology Division, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan;
e Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;
f National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Key Words. Blood • Dendritic Cells • Th1/Th2 • Cell trafficking

Yoichi Takaue, M.D., Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Unit, National Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Tsukiji 5-Chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. Telephone: 81-3-3542-2511; Fax: 81-3-3542-3815; e-mail: ytakaue{at}ncc.go.jp


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The role of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in the function of dendritic cells (DCs), T-cell polarization, and expression of chemokine receptors was evaluated in human cells. Immature DCs were generated from peripheral blood CD14+ cells using a combination of GM-CSF and interleukin-4 (IL-4) with or without PGE2. On day 6, maturation of DCs was induced by the addition of tumor necrosis factor alpha with or without PGE2. DCs harvested on day 6 (immature DCs) or day 9 (mature DCs) were examined using functional assays. In the presence of PGE2, immature and mature DCs showed, phenotypically, a lower expression of CD1a and, functionally, a higher allostimulatory capacity at a high DC/T-cell ratio than control cells cultured in the absence of PGE2. DCs cultured in the presence of PGE2 induced the differentiation of naïve T cells toward a helper T-cell type 1 (Th1) response, which was independent of IL-12 secretion in the basal state despite a slightly lower interferon gamma secretion compared with control cells. However, the function of cytotoxicity-stimulating autologous T cells was not augmented by the addition of PGE2. Immature DCs expressed the inflammatory chemokine receptors, CCR1 and CXCR4, but not CCR6, regardless of the presence or absence of PGE2. Mature DCs expressed CCR7 equally, measured using a migration test and the measurement of calcium flux with macrophage inflammatory protein-3ß and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay in all of the groups. All of these findings suggest that PGE2 affects the DC-promoted differentiation of naïve T cells to a Th1 response in the basal state, without affecting chemokine receptor expression on DCs.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells for initiating cellular immune responses through the stimulation of naïve T cells, and their action is mainly due to the constitutive and upregulated expression of molecules related to adhesion, major histocompatibility complex (MHC), and a costimulatory pathway [1–3]. Previously, the concept of a predetermined "one cell type-one type of response," e.g., myeloid DCs induce helper T-cell type 1 (Th1) responses while lymphoid/plasmacytoid DCs induce Th2 responses, was dominant [4]. However, many investigators have since reported that DCs promote T-cell polarization depending on environmental instructions in the culture conditions or on activation signals, rather than an intrinsic ontogeny [5,6]. DCs that generate Th1 responses may be used in clinically applicable therapeutic modalities for pathologic conditions that are caused by infections or malignant disorders, by secreting interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon gamma (IFN-{gamma}) to facilitate T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity [7–9]. In contrast, DCs that generate Th2 responses may be clinically used in conditions in which Th1 responses are disturbed, e.g., transplantation, contact allergy, or autoimmune disorders, by secreting cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10, to help B cells secrete protective antibodies [8,10].

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is produced by stromal cells and tissue-infiltrating mononuclear cells, and is an important inflammatory mediator that elevates intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP). PGE2 inhibits IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} production by Th1-type cells, but not the production of IL-4 by Th2-type cells [11–13], and thereby, regulates the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th2-type CD4+ T cells in vivo [11–13]. However, somewhat contradictory results have been reported regarding T-cell polarization induced by DCs that are cultured in the presence of PGE2. Kalinski and coworkers [6,14–16] reported that immature and mature DCs, generated in the presence of PGE2, either initially or during terminal maturation, induced naïve T cells toward a Th2 response by impairing the production of IL-12. On the other hand, other investigators reported the induction of a Th1 response mediated by the greater production of IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} with the addition of PGE2, which resulted in higher IL-12 production [17–19]. Thus, the definitive effect of PGE2 in the differentiation of DCs remains to be established.

Chemokines play an important role in trafficking DCs to lymphoid organs [20]. Immature DCs express various inflammatory chemokine receptors, such as CCR1, CCR4, CCR5, CCR6, and CXCR4. As maturation proceeds, DCs upregulate the constitutive expression of chemokine receptor CCR7 and downregulate inflammatory chemokine receptors, which permits DCs to be localized in lymphoid tissues where pulsed DCs stimulate effector T cells via the interaction with T-cell receptors [20–22]. In addition, previous reports have suggested that the conditions used to culture DCs affect the expression of chemokine receptors [23,24]. Thus, this field appears to be complex, and factors that affect DC function through the expression of chemokine receptors or interaction with their ligands need to be defined.

Hence, in this study, we investigated the roles of PGE2 in the regulation of DC function, particularly focusing on the polarization of T cells and the modification of the expression of chemokine receptors.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Medium, Reagents, and Monoclonal Antibodies
The medium used was RPMI-1640 (GIBCO-BRL; Grand Island, NY; http://www.invitrogen.com) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Hyclone; Logan, UT; http://www.hyclone.com) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (GIBCO-BRL). Recombinant human GM-CSF was provided by Kirin Brewery Company (Tokyo, Japan; http://www1.kirin.co.jp/english/r_d/pha/index.html). Recombinant IL-4, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-{alpha}), and IL-2 were purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN; http://www.rndsystems.com). PGE2 was purchased from ICN Biomedicals (Aurora, OH; http://www.icnbiomed.com) and rMIP-3ß/ELC was from Dako (Kyoto, Japan; http://www.dako.dk).

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed using mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled CD14 (CD14-FITC), HLA-DR-FITC, IFN-{gamma}-FITC, phycoerythrin-labeled CD80 (CD80-PE), CD54-PE, IL-4-PE, and CD4-Percp, which were purchased from Becton Dickinson (San Jose, CA; http://www.bd.com). CD40-FITC and CD86-FITC antibodies were from PharMingen (San Diego, CA; http://www.bdbiosciences.com/pharmingen), and mAbs against CD45RA-FITC, CD1a-PE, CD45RO-PE, and CD83-PE were from Coulter-Immunotech (Miami, FL; http://www.coulter.com). Biotinylated mAbs against CCR1, CXCR4, and CCR6 were purchased from Dako. Isotype controls were run in parallel. Cell debris was eliminated from the analysis by forward and side scatter gating. The samples were acquired on a FACS Caliber cell sorter (Becton Dickinson) and analyzed with CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson).

Generation of Immature DCs and Induction of Mature DCs
CD14+ cells isolated from leftover peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products, which were collected from healthy donors mobilized with G-CSF for allogeneic transplantation after obtaining a consent form, were used to generate DCs. In brief, the PBSC products produced 2-6 x5 108 cells after washing the material remaining in the apheresis bags. CD14+ cells were isolated from the PBSC products (>85% purity) using the magnetic activated cell sorter (MACS) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec; Auburn, CA; http://www.miltenyibiotec.com). To generate immature DCs, the CD14+ cells were cultured at a density of 1 x 106 cells per 1 ml of culture medium with one of the following combinations of cytokines: A) GM-CSF (50 ng/ml) and IL-4 (50 ng/ml) or B) GM-CSF (50 ng/ml), IL-4 (50 ng/ml), and PGE2 (10–7 M). Freshly prepared cytokines were added every other day. Maturation of DCs was induced by adding TNF-{alpha} (50 ng/ml) with or without PGE2 (10–7 M) to each group of cultures on day 6. DCs were harvested as immature (day 6) or mature (day 9) cells for morphologic, phenotypic, or functional evaluations. Additionally, the culture supernatants were collected on the same days and frozen at –20°C until measurement of IL-10 and IL-12 levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA).

Immature or mature DCs (3 x 104 cells) were then prepared on cytospin slides with centrifugation at 400 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 5 minutes. These slides were dried, fixed with Carnoy’s solution (ethanol:acetic acid:chloroform = 6:1:3), stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain, and visualized by light microscopy.

T-Cell Preparation
CD3+ cells for the mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay were obtained from the peripheral blood of a healthy donor using human T-cell enrichment columns (R&D Systems). Naive CD4+CD45RA+ T cells for the cytokine assay were isolated from the PBSC products by two-step positive selection using MACS. CD8+ cells for the cytotoxic assay were also isolated from autologous PBSC products by positive selection using MACS. The purity of isolated cells was >90% for CD3+ cells and >95% for naïve CD4+CD45RA+ T cells or CD8+ cells.

Endocytic Activity
Cells (1 x 105), suspended in 100 µl of culture medium, were incubated with FITC-dextran (20 µg/ml) for 1 hour at 37°C in a water bath or at 4°C on ice, and then washed thoroughly with cold buffer consisting of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 5 mM EDTA, and 2% FCS. The samples were acquired on a FACS Caliber cell sorter, with 104 gating events for each sample, and analyzed with CellQuest software. The results were expressed as a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) index calculated as the ratio of the MFI of the sample to the MFI of an isotype-matched control.

Allogeneic MLR
Allogeneic CD3+ cells (5 x 104/well), obtained from healthy donor blood, were cocultured in 96-well, round-bottomed culture plates with graded doses (2 x 102 - 5 x 104) of irradiated (30 Gy) DCs that were harvested from each group on day 6 or 9 of culture. After 5 days, the cells were pulsed with 1 Ci [3H]-methylthymidine per well for 16 hours, harvested, and analyzed in a liquid scintillation counter. The results were expressed as the mean counts per minute (cpm) ± the standard error (SE) of results obtained with four different samples, each performed in triplicate.

Intracellular Cytokine Staining
DCs (1.05 x 105 cells/500 µl) that were harvested on day 6 or 9 were primed with 50 ng/ml staphylococcal exotoxins (Toxin Technology Inc.; Sarasota, FL; http://www.toxintechnology.com), which contain an enterotoxin (SEA-SEE), exfoliative toxins (ETA and ETB), and toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1), for 1 hour at 37°C and then irradiated (30 Gy). DCs were cocultured with naïve CD4+CD45RA+ T cells (5 x 105/well) in the culture medium at ratios of 1:5 (total volume of 600 µl) and 1:300 (total volume of 500 µl) in 24-well plates. On day 5, the cells were washed out completely and expanded with fresh medium containing 500 U/ml of IL-2. Two hundred fifty microliters of culture supernatant were then replaced with medium of the same concentration every 3 days. On day 14, the supernatant was collected and frozen at –20°C until ELISA assays for IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 were performed. The intracellular cytokine concentrations of the harvested T cells were measured by FACS analysis, as described previously. Briefly, T cells (106) were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (10 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 µg/ml) for 4 hours in a 37°C water bath. Brefeldin A (10 µg/ml) was added during the last 2 hours of incubation to prevent cytokine secretion. Cells were collected, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde (Becton Dickinson), permeabilized with a commercial solution (Becton Dickinson), and stained with FITC-labeled anti-IFN-{gamma} (IgG2a) and PE-labeled anti-IL-4 (IgG1) mAbs. The samples were processed by a FACS Caliber cell sorter, with at least 104 gating events for each sample, and analyzed with CellQuest software.

Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte (CTL) Assay
Mature DCs (5 x 105) cultured from HLA-A24+ donors were loaded with 10 µM Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-derived peptide (TYGPVFMCL), which can bind to HLA-A2402 as reported by Lee et al. [25], for 2 hours at 37°C. In 24-well plates, autologous CD8+ T cells were cocultured as effector cells at a ratio of 2:1 with DCs in 2 ml of medium (RPMI 1640:AIM-V = 1:1) containing 10% FCS (Sigma; St. Louis, MO; http://www.sigmaaldrich.com), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (GIBCO-BRL), and 0.1 mM/l nonessential amino acids supplemented with 100 U/ml IL-2 for 10 days; half the medium was changed every 3 days. BEC-2 cell lines (HLA-A2402) and Bamb-2 cell lines (HLA-A1/A26) generated by EBV-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell line from an EBV+ healthy donor were kindly provided by Dr. Itoh (Kurume University School of Medicine; Kurume, Japan). The BEC-2 cells and Bamb-2 cells, as target cells, were loaded at a concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml with 10 µM EBV peptide and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2. Effector cells were cocultured with target cells at effector-to-target ratios of 2:1, 5:1, and 10:1 in 96-well round-bottomed culture plates (total volume of 200 µl) in duplicate or triplicate. After overnight incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, the human IFN-{gamma} concentration of the supernatant was measured (pg/ml) using ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (OptEIATM Human IFN-{gamma} Set; PharMingen).

Cytokine Assay by ELISA
IL-10 (limit of sensitivity, 3.9 pg/ml) and IL-12 (limit of sensitivity, 0.5 pg/ml) were measured in the supernatant collected at day 6 or 9 of DC culture using Quantikine Immunoassay Kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. IL-4 (limit of sensitivity, 0.13 pg/ml) and IFN-{gamma} were measured in the supernatant of naïve CD4+CD45RA+ cells obtained at day 14. Cytokines were quantified using a microplate reader at 450-490 nM, plotted against a standard curve with the cytokines, and expressed in pg/ml.

Transmigration Assay
To evaluate the chemotactic effects of DCs stimulated with chemokines, a double-chamber system was used, with previously described modifications [26]. Briefly, polycarbonate membranes with 8-µm pore size filters (ChemotaxicellTM; Kurabo; Osaka, Japan; http://www.kurabo.co.jp) were placed on 24-well culture plates to separate the upper and lower chambers. Macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3ß for mature DCs was seeded at concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 nM diluted with 500 µl of culture medium in the lower chambers. Next, 0.5-1 x 105/100 µl mature DCs were added to the upper chambers. After overnight incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, the cells that migrated into the lower chambers were collected. Using a Coulter counter, only cells larger than 12 µm were counted, to eliminate lymphocyte contamination. The results were expressed as a net migration percentage calculated as: (number of cells that migrated into the lower chamber containing chemokines—number of cells that migrated in medium alone)/total number of cells loaded in the upper chamber x 100.

Calcium Flux Measurement
Mature DCs, at a concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml, were loaded with 5 µg/ml Fluo-3AM (Calbiochem; San Diego, CA), incubated for 30 minutes in a 37°C water bath, and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1,500 rpm. The DCs were then resuspended in RPMI with 5% FCS at 1 x 106 cells/ml. Calcium flux was measured at 450 nM as a function of time in response to 100 nM MIP-3ß for mature DCs, with 3 mM EGTA and as a negative control and ionomycin (10 ng/ml) as a positive control, using a FACS Caliber cell sorter, and analyzed using FlowJo software (Becton Dickinson).

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) for CCR7
Total RNA was extracted from 1-2 x 106 mature DCs using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen; Hilden, Germany; http://www.qiagen.com). The cDNA synthesized from total RNA by Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Stratagene; Austin, TX; http://www.stratagene.com) was subjected to RT-PCR using 30 cycles at 94°C for 0.5 minutes, 57.5°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute for CCR7 (TaKaRa; Tokyo, Japan; http://www.takarabio.co.jp/english/index.htm). The sense and anti-sense oligonucleotide primers for CCR7 were 5'-CGCGTCCTTCTCATCAGCAA-3' and 5'-GTCCCGACAGGAAGACCACT-3', respectively. PCR products were identified by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels that were photographed.

Statistical Analysis
Values are presented as the mean ± SE. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare values between subgroups using SPSS 10.0 software. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Morphology, Phenotypic Features, and Endocytic Activity
With May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining, cells cultured with or without PGE2 for 6 or 9 days showed similar typical features of immature DCs (large cells with an irregular outline and a few veils) or mature DCs (large, veiled, nonadherent appearance and highly motile). However, when the cultured cells on the plates were directly observed without staining under phase-contrast microscopy on day 9, the cells cultured in the presence of PGE2 had less branching and fewer veiled structures than those without PGE2 (data not shown).

With FACS analysis, the expression of CD1a, CD40, and CD83 in immature DCs treated with PGE2 was significantly lower than that in control cells without PGE2 (means 8%, 40%, and 2% versus 73%, 86%, and 11%, respectively; p = 0.001, p = 0.004, and p = 0.028, respectively) as shown in Table 1Go. The expression of CD14 on immature DCs was retained in cells cultured with PGE2, while this was lost in control cells (mean 86% versus 12%, p = 0.001, Table 1Go). Other phenotypes, including HLA-DR, CD80, CD86, and CD54 were similarly highly expressed on both cells, regardless of the presence of PGE2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of phenotypes of immature DCs (iDC) cultured with GM-CSF + IL-4 and immature DCs (PGE2-iDC) cultured in the presence of PGE2 on day 6
 
When mature DCs, which were treated with TNF-{alpha} alone as a maturating agent, were evaluated by FACS, the cells with added PGE2 showed a significantly lower expression of CD1a than control cells (88% versus 65%, p = 0.024, Table 2Go). TNF-{alpha} also induced a similar maturation pattern in immature DCs that were initially cultured with PGE2. CD1a expression in these cells was almost completely recovered when PGE2 was removed compared with the continuous presence of PGE2 (78% versus 19%, p = 0.004, Table 2Go). However, the DCs from which PGE2 had been removed showed a lower expression of CD83 and CD86, compared with those in the continuous presence of PGE2 (means of 62% and 72% versus 88% and 92%, respectively, p = 0.016 and p = 0.01, Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Comparison of phenotypes of mature DCs cultured with various cytokine combinations on day 9
 
We then used FITC-dextran to measure mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis in immature and mature DCs induced by various cytokine combinations. In immature DCs, the MFI index tended to be higher in the presence of PGE2 than in the controls (29 ± 11 versus 16 ± 6). However, the ability to take up soluble antigen decreased as DCs matured (data not shown).

DC with Added PGE2 Showed a High MLR at a High DC/T-Cell Ratio
Immature DCs cultured with PGE2 had a higher capacity to stimulate allogeneic CD3+ T cells than control cells at a higher DC/T-cell ratio (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007 at ratios of 1:1 and 1:2, respectively, Fig. 1AGo). On the other hand, there were lower allostimulatory effects in the MLR at a lower cell ratio, although variations were noted among different samples (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0013 at ratios of 1:16 and 1:128, respectively, Fig. 1AGo). These findings suggest that PGE2 affected the allostimulatory capacity of DCs depending upon the DC/T-cell ratio. The allostimulatory capacity of mature DCs on CD3+ T cells was also higher when the cells were cultured with PGE2 than without PGE2 at a high cell-dose ratio (Fig. 1BGo).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Allogeneic T-cell stimulatory capacity of immature DCs (A) and mature DCs (B) cultured with or without PGE2. CD3+ cells (5 x 104 cells/well) isolated from healthy donors were cocultured with graded doses of irradiated DCs, and on day 5, [3H]-methylthymidine was added 16 hours before measurement of the proliferative response. Data shown are the mean cpm (± SE) of triplicate cultures from four independent experiments.

 
Effects of PGE2 on DC-Mediated Th1 Polarization of Naive T Cells
When immature DCs, which had been cultured in the presence of PGE2, were used to induce the differentiation of naïve T cells, there was a shift toward Th1 polarization, as judged by elevated IFN-{gamma} levels, minimal expression of IL-4 by intracellular cytokine staining, and ELISA assays, although a slightly lower excretion of IFN-{gamma} than in controls was observed in the presence of PGE2 at high DC/T-cell ratios (1:5). Mature DCs also showed a higher level of IFN-{gamma} and a lower level of IL-4, but there was no difference in cytokine levels between different culture conditions (Figs. 2 and 3GoGo). The addition of PGE2 resulted in a lower IFN-{gamma} production by naïve T cells, and removal of PGE2 at maturation induced a complete recovery of IFN-{gamma} secretion (Fig. 3Go). This suggests that, in the presence of PGE2, immature or mature DCs induce naïve T cells to differentiate toward a Th1 response and that PGE2 inhibits the Th1 polarization of naïve T cells. Additionally, T cells cocultured with immature or mature DCs at a low cell ratio (1:300) showed a greater production of IL-4 and a lower production of IFN-{gamma} than those at a high cell ratio, regardless of the presence of PGE2. This finding suggests that naïve T cells are polarized toward both Th1 and Th2 responses at a low DC/T-cell ratio (Figs. 2 and 3GoGo).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Immature (A) and mature DCs (B) cultured in the presence of PGE2 induced the differentiation of naïve CD4+CD45RA+ cells to a Th1 response at a high ratio of DCs/T cells (1:5) and to a Th1/Th2 response at a low ratio (1:300). Naïve T cells were cocultured with DCs after being pulsed with staphylococcal exotoxins, expanded with the addition of 500 U/ml IL-2 from day 5, and harvested on day 14. Intracellular cytokine (IFN-{gamma} and IL-4) concentrations were measured after restimulation with PMA and ionomycin for 4 hours on day 14. The data shown are from one representative experiment. Similar data were obtained in two other subgroups of mature DCs.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Measurement of IFN-{gamma} (A) and IL-4 (B) by ELISA in supernatant (on day 14) of naïve CD4+CD45RA+ T cells stimulated by immature or mature DCs. DCs under culture with PGE2 induced naïve T cells to secrete high amounts of IFN-{gamma}, although less than that secreted by control cells, but a low amount of IL-4 at a high ratio of DCs/T cells (1:5). However, naïve T cells at a low ratio (1:300) tended to have a lower IFN-{gamma} level and a greater IL-4 level than those at a high ratio (1:5). Data shown are the mean ± SE from four independent experiments.

 
Levels of IL-12 and IL-10 measured in the culture supernatant of immature or mature DCs were basically very low, with no difference between the presence or absence of PGE2 (Fig. 4Go). In this study, IL-12 and IL-10 were measured in the basal state without any other stimulation. Therefore, this finding suggests that T-cell polarization by DCs in the basal state does not depend on IL-10 or IL-12.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Measurement of IL-10 (A) and IL-12 (B) in supernatant of immature or mature DC culture without further stimulation. DCs, regardless of the presence or absence of PGE2, secreted very low levels of both cytokines in the basal state, suggesting that such secretion is not related to IFN-{gamma} secretion. The results represent the mean (pg/ml) ± SE of at least seven independent experiments.

 
Mature DCs Cultured with PGE2 Did not Augment the Cytotoxicity of CD8+ T Cells Against BEC-2 Target Cells
We compared the CTL responses of autologous CD8+ T cells supported by mature DCs cultured with or without PGE2, after the observation that DCs in the presence of PGE2 induced naïve T-cell differentiation into a Th1 response. CD8+ T cells that were stimulated with EBV-pulsed mature DCs showed stronger CTL responses against BEC-2 target cells, as measured by IFN-{gamma} ELISA assay, than against Bamb-2 target cells. This stimulation depended on the effector-to-target ratio. However, the potency of CTL itself was not augmented in the presence of PGE2 (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Autologous CD8+ T cells cocultured with mature DCs showed higher cytolytic activity against BEC-2 target cells at a high effector-to-target ratio than against Bamb-2 target cells. However, the addition of PGE2 did not affect the production of T cell IFN-{gamma} by mature DCs. Autologous CD8+ T cells were cocultured with mature DCs pulsed with EBV-derived peptide, expanded with 100 U/ml IL-2, and, on day 8, restimulated with BEC-2 or Bamb-2 target cells at various effector-to-target ratios. After overnight culture, the IFN-{gamma} concentration in the supernatant was measured by ELISA assay. The data are from one representative experiment.

 
PGE2 Did not Affect the Expression of Chemokine Receptors by Immature or Mature DCs
To evaluate whether the expression of chemokine receptors on DCs was affected by PGE2, we performed a FACS analysis using mAbs to chemokine receptors in immature DCs, a transmigration test and calcium flux measurement using chemokines in mature DCs, and RT-PCR of CCR7 in mature DCs.

Phenotypic analysis of immature DCs using flow cytometry showed a high expression of CCR1 and CXCR4, with no difference between cell cultures with and without PGE2, whereas CCR6 was not expressed at all in immature DCs (Fig. 6Go). In mature DCs, there was a high migration and a high calcium flux in response to MIP-3ß, the ligand for CCR7, regardless of whether DCs were treated with PGE2 or not (Fig. 7Go). Additionally, RT-PCR to examine the expression of CCR7 showed similar positive reactions in mature DCs cultured with or without PGE2 (Fig. 7Go).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. FACS analysis of chemokine receptor expression in immature DCs. Immature DCs showed a high expression of CCR1 and CXCR4 (solid line), but no expression of CCR6 (solid line). However, the addition of PGE2 did not affect the expression of these chemokine receptors on CD14+-cell-derived DCs. Dotted lines represent isotype-matched negative controls.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Chemotaxis (A) and Ca2+ flux measurements (B) in response to MIP-3ß and RT-PCR analysis (C) of CCR7 mRNA by mature DC generated from cultures containing various combinations of cytokines with or without PGE2. A) DCs underwent in vitro migration in response to stimulation with graded concentrations of MIP-3ß as a ligand for CCR7. The results represent the mean (% net migration) ±SE of three independent experiments. B) DCs loaded with 5 µg/ml Fluo-3AM were tested for their response to MIP-3ß (100 nM) with regard to Ca2+ flux. C) cDNA prepared from 1-2 x 106 mature DCs were subjected to RT-PCR with a CCR7-specific primer. The PCR products (573 bp) were fractionaed on 2% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study showed that, in the presence of PGE2, DCs enhanced naïve T cells to polarize toward a Th1 response, independent of IL-12 secretion in the basal state, without any change in the expression of chemokine receptors on DCs. Moreover, PGE2 induced a lower expression of CD1a and a persistently higher expression of CD14 in immature DCs, which is consistent with previous reports by other groups [14,16,17,19]. Additionally, the observed phenotypic findings were similar to those for monocyte-derived macrophages cultured with M-CSF [27]. While monocyte-derived macrophages had little allostimulatory capacity, immature DCs derived from CD14+ cells with PGE2 elicited a stronger MLR response than that of control cells cultured without PGE2 [3,28]. The reported allostimulatory capacity of T cells has varied when DCs were cultured in the presence of PGE2 [15,17,18,28].

This confusion is likely the result of different culture conditions, i.e., various cytokine combinations and culture media. Without the standardization of culture conditions, the results cannot be directly compared. In this study, immature DCs cultured in the presence of PGE2 showed variable allostimulatory capacity that totally depended on the ratio of DC to T cells; a higher MLR response was seen at a higher ratio and a lower MLR response was seen at a lower ratio. In this study, DCs cultured with added PGE2 during maturation had an enhanced allostimulatory capacity for CD3+ T cells compared with controls without PGE2.

Skewing of naïve T cells toward a Th1 or Th2 response is a crucial process in determining the ultimate outcome of the immune response, and this is affected by the culture environment of antigen-presenting DCs, as well as by the modulation of T-cell-receptor-mediated activation signals [29–31]. In this study, PGE2 caused DCs to induce naïve T cells, which secreted IFN-{gamma} independent of IL-12 secretion in the basal state, with a Th1 response. Hence, some of our findings are consistent with recently published reports that PGE2 promoted a Th1 response [17,19]. However, the results from these reports suggested that IL-12 production by DCs was crucial for increasing the production of IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} [17–19]. This discrepancy regarding IL-12 production between our study and others might be explained by differences in the supernatant sample used for the measurement; we measured the supernatant of DCs cultured in the presence of PGE2 without further stimulation, while others used supernatant after stimulating cells with various agents or supernatant of stimulated naïve T cells. A recent report supports our observation by finding only slight IL-12 secretion measured in samples in the basal state without further stimulation [32]. In addition, there is an interesting report that a high DC/T-cell ratio (1:4) resulted in a mixed Th1/Th2 response, while a low DC/T-cell ratio (1:300) induced T cells to become Th2 effectors, suggesting that the polarization of naïve T cells was influenced by their environment [33]. We showed that CD14+-cell-derived DCs induced naïve T-cell differentiation with a Th1/Th2 response at a lower DC/T-cell ratio (1:300), although we used different DC maturation agents and a different stimulation of T cells by DCs than the previous report [33].

In contrast, Kalinski and coworkers [6,14–16] reported that PGE2 induced type 2-polarized DCs, which promote the development of Th2 cells from naïve T cells via the inhibition of IL-12 production by DCs. Although Steinbrink et al. [19] argued that differences in the medium and cytokine combinations used for DC culture or a different ratio of T cells to DCs at stimulation produced contradictory results, we think that this discrepancy mainly resulted from the stimulating agents, such as cytokines or superantigen, used to produce DC maturation or to augment naïve T-cell stimulation, since we used a similar medium and ratio of T cells to DCs to those of Kalinski and coworkers. In that study, however, PGE2 inhibited Th1 polarization of naïve T cells by DCs in the basal state compared with controls. Based on this observation, it is still possible that the induction of a Th2 response of naïve T cells by DCs is promoted by strong stimulating agents.

We evaluated the CTL response to examine the possible clinical application of our culture system, since DCs in the presence of PGE2 induced a significant Th1 response. Unfortunately, the DCs cultured with PGE2 did not produce a stronger CTL response than control cells cultured without PGE2, thus excluding the possibility of clinical application. On the other hand, much attention has recently been focused on chemokine receptors as promising targets for clinical application. When immature DCs undergo maturation with various agents, CCR7, a constitutive chemokine receptor, is upregulated, and inflammatory chemokine receptors are downregulated, allowing the migration of DCs to lymphoid tissues [20–22]. In general, CCR6, a specific receptor for MIP-3ß/liver and activation-regulated chemokine, is highly expressed in immature DCs derived from CD34+ cord blood precursors, but not in CD14+ peripheral blood monocyte-derived DCs [20–22]. Recently, Yang et al. [24] reported that CCR6 was also expressed in monocyte-derived DCs cultured in the presence of transforming growth factor-1 and that this contributed to the regulation of the trafficking of DCs, suggesting that DC culture conditions significantly affect the expression of chemokine receptors. In our study, immature DCs cultured in the presence of PGE2 showed a high expression of CCR1 and CXCR4, but did not express CCR6 by a phenotype analysis. In addition, there was no difference in the expressions of CCR7 between mature DCs cultured with and without PGE2, which supports the notion that PGE2 does not directly influence the expression of chemokines.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that DCs cultured in the presence of PGE2 enhance the differentiation of naïve T cells toward the Th1 type, independent of IL-12 secretion in the basal state, and that PGE2 does not have any significant effect on chemokine receptor expression by DCs.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan. We thank Dr. Kyogo Itoh of the Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan, for kindly providing the BEC-2 and Bamb-2 cell lines.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Steinman RM. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol 1991;9:271–296.[CrossRef][Medline]

  2. Hart DN. Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which control the primary immune response. Blood 1997;90:3245–3287.[Free Full Text]

  3. Avigan D. Dendritic cells: development, function and potential use for cancer immunotherapy. Blood Rev 1999;13:51–64.[CrossRef][Medline]

  4. Grabbe S, Kampgen E, Schuler G. Dendritic cells: multi-lineal and multi-functional. Immunol Today 2000;21:431–433.[CrossRef][Medline]

  5. Rissoan MC, Soumelis V, Kadowaki N et al. Reciprocal control of T helper cell and dendritic cell differentiation. Science 1999;283:1183–1186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Vieira PL, de Jong EC, Wierenga EA et al. Development of Th1-inducing capacity in myeloid dendritic cells requires environmental instruction. J Immunol 2000;164:4507–4512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Trinchieri G, Scott P. The role of interleukin 12 in the immune response, disease and therapy. Immunol Today 1994;15:460–463.[CrossRef][Medline]

  8. Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 1998;392:245–252.[CrossRef][Medline]

  9. Tarte K, Klein B. Dendritic cell-based vaccine: a promising approach for cancer immunotherapy. Leukemia 1999;13:653–663.[CrossRef][Medline]

  10. O’Garra A, Murphy K. T-cell subsets in autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol 1993;5:880–886.[CrossRef][Medline]

  11. Davies P, Bailey PJ, Goldenberg MM et al. The role of arachidonic acid oxygenation products in pain and inflammation. Annu Rev Immunol 1984;2:335–357.[CrossRef][Medline]

  12. Betz M, Fox BS. Prostaglandin E2 inhibits production of Th1 lymphokines but not of Th2 lymphokines. J Immunol 1991;146:108–113.[Abstract]

  13. Snijdewint FG, Kalinski P, Wierenga EA et al. Prostaglandin E2 differentially modulates cytokine secretion profiles of human T helper lymphocytes. J Immunol 1993;150:5321–5329.[Abstract]

  14. Kalinski P, Hilkens CM, Snijders A et al. Dendritic cells, obtained from peripheral blood precursors in the presence of PGE2, promote Th2 responses. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997;417:363–367.[Medline]

  15. Kalinski P, Hilkens CM, Snijders A et al. IL-12-deficient dendritic cells, generated in the presence of prostaglandin E2, promote type 2 cytokine production in maturing human naïve T helper cells. J Immunol 1997;159:28–35.[Abstract]

  16. Kalinski P, Schuitemaker JH, Hilkens CM et al. Prostaglandin E2 induces the final maturation of IL-12-deficient CD1a+CD83+ dendritic cells: the levels of IL-12 are determined during the final dendritic cell maturation and are resistant to further modulation. J Immunol 1998;161:2804–2809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Rieser C, Bock G, Klocker H et al. Prostaglandin E2 and tumor necrosis factor alpha cooperate to activate human dendritic cells: synergistic activation of interleukin 12 production. J Exp Med 1997;186:1603–1608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Rieser C, Papesh C, Herold M et al. Differential deactivation of human dendritic cells by endotoxin desensitization: role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and prostaglandin E2. Blood 1998;91:3112–3117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Steinbrink K, Paragnik L, Jonuleit H et al. Induction of dendritic cell maturation and modulation of dendritic cell-induced immune responses by prostaglandins. Arch Dermatol Res 2000;292:437–445.[CrossRef][Medline]

  20. Cyster JG. Chemokines and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Science 1999;286:2098–2102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A et al. Chemokines and dendritic cell traffic. J Clin Immunol 2000;20:151–160.[CrossRef][Medline]

  22. Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A et al. The role of chemokines in the regulation of dendritic cell trafficking. J Leukoc Biol 1999;66:1–9.[Abstract]

  23. Carramolino L, Kremer L, Goya I et al. Down-regulation of the beta-chemokine receptor CCR6 in dendritic cells mediated by TNF-alpha and IL-4. J Leukoc Biol 1999;66:837–844.[Abstract]

  24. Yang D, Howard OM, Chen Q et al. Cutting edge: immature dendritic cells generated from monocytes in the presence of TGF-beta 1 express functional C-C chemokine receptor 6. J Immunol 1999;163:1737–1741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Palucka KA, Taquet N, Sanchez-Chapuis F et al. Dendritic cells as the terminal stage of monocyte differentiation. J Immunol 1998;160:4587–4595.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Jonuleit H, Kuhn U, Muller G et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins induce maturation of potent immunostimulatory dendritic cells under fetal calf serum-free conditions. Eur J Immunol 1997;27:3135–3142.[Medline]

  27. von Andrian UH, Mackay CR. T-cell function and migration. Two sides of the same coin. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1020–1034.[Free Full Text]

  28. Openshaw P, Murphy EE, Hosken NA et al. Heterogeneity of intracellular cytokine synthesis at the single-cell level in polarized T helper 1 and T helper 2 populations. J Exp Med 1995;182:1357–1367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Tao X, Constant S, Jorritsma P et al. Strength of TCR signal determines the costimulatory requirements for Th1 and Th2 CD4+ T cell differentiation. J Immunol 1997;159:5956–5963.[Abstract]

  30. Mosca PJ, Hobeika AC, Clay TM et al. A subset of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells expresses high levels of interleukin-12 in response to combined CD40 ligand and interferon-gamma treatment. Blood 2000;96:3499–3504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  31. Tanaka H, Demeure CE, Rubio M et al. Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells induce naïve T cell differentiation into T helper cell type 2 (Th2) or Th1/Th2 effectors. Role of stimulator/responder ratio. J Exp Med 2000;192:405–412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Lee SP, Tierney RJ, Thomas WA et al. Conserved CTL epitopes within EBV latent membrane protein 2: a potential target for CTL-based tumor therapy. J Immunol 1997;158:3325–3334.[Abstract]

  33. Zou W, Borvak J, Marches F et al. Macrophage-derived dendritic cells have strong Th1-polarizing potential mediated by beta-chemokines rather than IL-12. J Immunol 2000;165:4388–4396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received April 25, 2002; accepted for publication June 26, 2002.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Khayrullina, J.-H. Yen, H. Jing, and D. Ganea
In Vitro Differentiation of Dendritic Cells in the Presence of Prostaglandin E2 Alters the IL-12/IL-23 Balance and Promotes Differentiation of Th17 Cells
J. Immunol., July 1, 2008; 181(1): 721 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. T. Bender and J. A. Beavo
PDE1B2 regulates cGMP and a subset of the phenotypic characteristics acquired upon macrophage differentiation from a monocyte
PNAS, January 10, 2006; 103(2): 460 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
M. T. Rubio, T. K. Means, R. Chakraverty, J. Shaffer, Y. Fudaba, M. Chittenden, A. D. Luster, and M. Sykes
Maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MoDCs) in the presence of prostaglandin E2 optimizes CD4 and CD8 T cell-mediated responses to protein antigens: role of PGE2 in chemokine and cytokine expression by MoDCs
Int. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 17(12): 1561 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Vassallo, K. Tamada, J. S. Lau, P. R. Kroening, and L. Chen
Cigarette Smoke Extract Suppresses Human Dendritic Cell Function Leading to Preferential Induction of Th-2 Priming
J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2684 - 2691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Kubo, H. K. Takahashi, M. Takei, H. Iwagaki, T. Yoshino, N. Tanaka, S. Mori, and M. Nishibori
E-Prostanoid (EP)2/EP4 Receptor-Dependent Maturation of Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells and Induction of Helper T2 Polarization
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2004; 309(3): 1213 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kakizoe, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kakizoe, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS
http://www.stemcellsportal.com/