|
|
||||||||
a Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco, California;
b Departments of Physiology and
c Urology,
d Programs in Human Genetics, Cancer Genetics and Development, and Stem Cell Biology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
Key Words. Human embryonic stem cells • Pluripotent • Germ cell • OCT-4 • STELLAR • NANOG • GDF3 • Ovary • Testis • Embryonal carcinoma • Teratoma
Renee A. Reijo Pera, Ph.D., Center for Reproductive Sciences, HSE1656, Box 0556 UCSF, San Francisco, California 94143-0556, USA. Telephone: 415-476-3178; Fax: 415-476-3121; e-mail: reijo{at}itsa.ucsf.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A common biological link among hES cells, the epiblast, and premeiotic germ cells is pluripotency, or the ability of these cell types to contribute to multiple embryonic lineages [1, 9]. Interestingly, Oct-4 is enriched in each of these three cell populations in mice; with respect to germ cells, expression is reduced as meiotic differentiation is initiated [10]. Thus, we hypothesized that genes with restricted expression patterns similar to OCT-4 also may be critical regulators of pluripotency in humans.
Examination of Unigene EST databases for tissues that express human OCT-4 revealed that it is largely expressed in human germ cell tumors. The elevated expression may reflect an increase in the germ cell (OCT-4+) to somatic cell (OCT-4-) ratio in these tumors. Based on these observations, we sought to identify novel genes that are expressed exclusively in pluripotent cell types by taking advantage of an observation that a consistent structural chromosomal abnormality associated with the formation and/or overproliferation of germ cell tumors in men is the formation of 12p isochromosomes. These isochromosomes may overexpress 12p genes that are associated with excessive growth of undifferentiated germ lineage cells [11, 12]. As a result, we chose to identify novel genes that may be associated with the molecular regulation of pluripotency by focusing on human chromosome 12p. The region of the mouse genome syntenic to human 12p is the distal end of mouse chromosome 6.
A search for loci present on the mouse chromosome 6 identified stella [13]. stella encodes a putative DNA-binding protein that is expressed differentially between nascent germ cells and their somatic neighbors at E7.25 in mice. As development progresses, stella expression is restricted to germ line stem cells. Given that mouse stella passed our criteria of having Oct-4-like expression and mapped to a chromosomal location syntenic to human chromosome 12p, we explored this genomic locus in more detail.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We identified a predicted gene with homology to mouse stella (ENS0000034235) on human chromosome 12p. Full-length human STELLA cDNA was obtained by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from testis and ovary cDNA. Genomic structure of the predicted STELLA-related (STELLAR) gene was determined by BLAST analysis in ENSEMBL. Identification of the 3' end of STELLAR was obtained by 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) from testis cDNA using the SMART/CDSIII cDNA library construction kit (Clontech Inc.; Palo Alto, CA; http://www.clontech.com/index.shtml). BLAST analysis of the human STELLAR nucleotide sequence in the NCBI database also identified predicted genomic pseudogenes (intronless genes) on human chromosome 12, 14, and X; there were no corresponding mouse pseudogenes identified to any of these syntenic locations in the mouse genome.
Cell Culture
Information regarding the hES cell lines HSF-6, HSF-1, and H9 can be obtained at http://stemcells.nih.gov/stemcell. The ES lines, HSF-6 and HSF-1, were obtained from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF; National Institutes of Health [NIH] code UCO6 and UC01, respectively). H9 (NIH code W-9) was obtained from the University of Wisconsin [1]. Undifferentiated hES cell colonies were cultured on irradiated CF1 mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells at 5% CO2 in medium containing knock-out Dulbeccos-modified Eagles medium (DMEM)-high glucose, 20% KnockOut Serum Replacer, 1 mM glutamine, nonessential amino acids (all from GIBCO BRL; Carlsbad, CA; http://www.invitrogen.com), 0.1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol (Sigma; St. Louis, MO; http://www.sigmaaldrich.com), and 4 ng/µl fibroblast growth factor-2 (R&D Systems; Minneapolis, MN; http://www.rndsystems.com). To differentiate hES cells into embryoid bodies (EBs), cells were cultured at 5% CO2 in medium containing knockout DMEM-high glucose, 20% fetal calf serum, 1 mM glutamine, and 0.1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol. At days 0, 3, 7, and 14, EBs were collected, centrifuged, and resuspended in 600 ml RLT buffer (Qiagen; Valencia, CA; http://www.qiagen.com).
RNA and cDNA Production
Adult human testis mRNA was from Clontech Inc. Adult female ovary mRNA was from Ambion (Austin, TX; http://www.ambion.com). cDNA was generated from mRNA using 250 ng of random hexamers under standard conditions with murine leukemia virus RT (Promega; Madison, WI; http://www.promega.com). Seminoma samples were obtained from the UCSF Cancer Center Tissue Registry; testicular biopsies and oocytes were from the UCSF Center for Reproductive Health.
All human samples were obtained after Institutional Review Board approval. Total RNA isolated from all tissues and cells, with the exception of oocytes, was extracted via the RNeasy system according to instructions (Qiagen). cDNA was generated via random priming as above. Total RNA from oocytes was extracted using the PicoPure RNA isolation system (Arcturus; Mountain View, CA; http://www.arctur.com) followed by cDNA production with 250 ng/µl random hexamers (Promega) as above. Following extraction from human oocytes, cDNA was concentrated using DNA Clean and Concentrator (Zymo Research; Orange, CA; http://www.zymoresearch.com). cDNA from pooled human fetal ovaries at 2029 weeks of gestation was obtained from Spring Bioscience (Fremont, AZ; http://www.springbio.com), and the fetal cDNA panel was from Clontech. PCR was performed with 50 ng or 100 ng of first-strand cDNA reaction as specified.
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymerase chain reactions contained 3 mM MgCl2; 10 mM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP; 2 µM primers; and 0.25 U platinum Taq (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA; http://www.invitrogen.com). The PCR reaction was initiated by hot start at 95°C for 5 minutes followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. Real-time PCR for human STELLAR, GDF3, NANOG, SYCP1, and OCT-4 was performed as above except for addition of 1x SYBR Green (Molecular Probes; Eugene, OR; http://www.probes.com), 1x fluorescein (Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA; http://www.bio-rad.com), and 2% dimethylsulfoxide. All reactions for real-time PCR were performed in the presence of 4.5 mM MgCl2 and analyzed using an iCycler iQ (Bio-Rad), calibrated for use with SYBR green. Equal reaction efficiencies of all five genes were verified, and mean normalized expression was calculated using Relative Expression Software Tool (REST XL) [14].
All experiments included negative controls with no cDNA, and primers were designed to span exons to distinguish cDNA. Primers were: STELLAR primers: (5'-GTTA CTGGGCGGAGTTCGTA-3')/(5'-TGAAGTGGCTTGG TGTCTTG-3') (174 bp); GDF3 primers: (5'-AGACTTAT GCTACGTAAAGGAGCT-3')/(5'-CTTTGATGGCAG ACAGGTTAAAGTA-3') (150 bp); NANOG primers: (5'-CAGCTGTGTGTACTCAATGATAGATTT-3')/(5'-CAACTGGCCGAAGAATAGCAATGGTGT-3') (142 bp); Deleted in AZoospermia-Like (DAZL) primers: (5'-ATGTTA GGATGGATGAAACTGAGATTA-3')/(5'-CCATGG AAATTTATCTGTGATTCTACT-3') (178 bp); GAPDH primers: (5'-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3')/(5'-TCCA CCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3') (500 bp); OCT-4 primers: (5'-ACATCAAAGCTCTGCAGAAAGAACT-3')/(5'-CTGAATACCTTCCCAAATAGAACCC-3') (133 bp); NCAM-1 primers: (5'-ATGGAAACTCTATTAAAGTGA ACCTGA-3')/(5'-TAGACCTCATACTCAGCATTCC AGT-3') (187 bp); and SYCP1 primers: (5'-AAGATTTAC AGATAGCAACAAACACA-3')/(5'-AATCTTTGCTGT TCTGTTCTCAATAA-3') (169 bp).
Northern Blot
Purified STELLAR (nucleotides 362-444; AY230136
[GenBank]
) and NANOG (nucleotides, 115-413; AY230262
[GenBank]
) PCR products were labeled via random priming per the manufacturers instructions (Roche; Indianapolis, IN; http://www.roche.com) and incorporation of freshly labeled
32P dCTP. Human Northern membranes and hybridization solution were purchased from Clontech for analysis of STELLAR and from RNWAY Laboratories Inc. (Seoul, Korea; http://www.rnway.com) for analysis of NANOG. Membranes were hybridized and washed as previously outlined [15] and exposed to XOMAT film at -80°C for 10 days. The membranes were stripped then reprobed with labeled GAPDH probe to ensure equal loading of samples.
Statistics
Pair-wise comparisons were made using analysis of variance, followed by two-tailed t-tests. Significance was assumed at p < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To obtain the full-length cDNA sequence of human STELLAR and NANOG, we performed PCR amplification of human testis and hES cell (HSF-6) cDNA and compared the sequences of the cloned fragments with their respective annotated genomic loci. The accession numbers of cloned STELLAR and NANOG obtained in the current analysis are AY230136 [GenBank] and AY230262 [GenBank] , respectively.
STELLAR and NANOG Expression in Adult and Embryonic Tissues
Northern blot analysis was used to examine expression of NANOG and STELLAR in adult human tissues (Fig. 2A
and Fig. 2B
). Expression of GDF3 in adult human tissues was previously reported [17]. Expression of both STELLAR and NANOG in all human adult tissues examined was extremely low (Fig. 2A
and 2B
). In both cases, a minimum of 10 days of exposure was required in order to observe the weak signals. STELLAR probe hybridized to a 1.1-kb band in ovary, testis, and thymus consistent with the length of the cDNA transcript identified from human testis (Fig. 2A
). In addition, a larger 4.4-kb STELLAR band of unknown origin was also detected in testis and ovary; 3' RACE failed to identify this STELLAR transcript, although it may represent an alternatively spliced variant or novel 5' structure not identified in the current analysis. NANOG was detected as a faint 2.2-kb band exclusively in the testis (Fig. 2B
). Given this extremely low expression level, we used a more sensitive RT-PCR approach to examine expression of these three loci, and OCT-4, in human fetal tissues (Fig. 2C
). We found that OCT-4, STELLAR, and NANOG were expressed only in fetal ovary. All other fetal tissues had basal levels of transcription comparable to OCT-4 and lacked detectable expression. By comparison, GDF3 was enriched in fetal ovaries; however, expression was also detected in fetal kidney, lung, skeletal muscle, and thymus.
|
|
|
|
|
Human STELLAR, NANOG, and GDF3 Expression Decreases in hES Cells with Differentiation
Given the similarities of expression of the STELLAR, GDF3, and NANOG genes to those of OCT-4 in germ cells and germ cell tumors, we compared the relative levels of STELLAR, GDF3, and NANOG in three undifferentiated hES cell lines (HSF-6, HSF-1, and H9; Fig. 6
). We found that all three genes were expressed in undifferentiated ES cells. NANOG was expressed at significantly higher levels than STELLAR and GDF3 in HSF-1 (p = 0.023), H9 (p = 0.004), and HSF-6 (p = 0.002); there was no statistically significant difference in expression between STELLAR and GDF3 in any of the three cell lines. In particular, NANOG was expressed at approximately 10-fold higher levels than GDF3 and threefold higher levels than STELLAR in the hES cell line HSF-1 (Fig. 6B
). Similar expression was observed in the H9 and HSF-6 cell lines.
|
fetoprotein (AFP) were significantly (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively) increased with differentiation (Fig. 7
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We focused our search on novel loci on human chromosome 12p, which is a known chromosomal hotspot for structural chromosomal changes associated with formation of germ cell tumors. We identified the human STELLAR gene by synteny mapping to the mouse stella locus on mouse chromosome 6 and characterized the neighboring human genes, NANOG and GDF3, with regard to expression in adult and fetal tissues, as well as expression in pluripotent hES cells. We determined that human STELLAR, NANOG, and GDF3 are enriched in organs containing pluripotent cells. In particular, we identified NANOG and STELLAR expression in fetal ovary with no detectable expression in any other fetal somatic tissue examined. By comparison, GDF3 was enriched in fetal ovary, with lower levels of expression in fetal kidney, lung, skeletal muscle, and thymus. In adult human tissues, we determined that STELLAR, NANOG, and GDF3 were localized to the ovary and testis, and expression of all three genes was upregulated in testicular germ cell tumor samples. In ovulated unfertilized oocytes, we found comparable levels of STELLAR and the germ cell-specific gene, DAZL, and no detectable expression of NANOG or GDF3. Analysis of three independently derived lines of undifferentiated pluripotent hES cells revealed that STELLAR, GDF3, and NANOG were consistently expressed in all three undifferentiated lines, and that expression decreased with differentiation.
This study using human tissues illustrates both the similarities and differences in gene expression of GDF3, STELLAR, and NANOG compared with previous reports from mice. In mice, stella localizes to all cells during the early stages of preimplantation development and is downregulated from E3.5 prior to inner cell mass formation [16]. Expression of stella resumes in the germ cells of the allantoic bud, where it is then found exclusively in migrating germ cells and gonadal primordial germ cells [13, 16]. In the adult ovary, mouse stella is then found in oocytes throughout folliculogenesis, as well as in ovulated unfertilized eggs [16]. In mice, nanog localizes to all stages of preimplantation embryo development, from fertilized eggs to the inner cell mass of blastocyst [5, 20]. Like the current study in humans, mouse nanog is not found in unfertilized eggs. In addition, like mouse stella, mouse nanog is also expressed in primordial germ cells of the fetal gonad or genital ridge [5], and in the current study, we detected high levels of both NANOG and STELLAR in human fetal gonads. The difference between previously reported expression of mouse nanog and our findings is that we detected NANOG in adult testis and ovary in humans, whereas, in mice, there is no apparent expression in any adult tissue except embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells derived from testicular germ cell tumors [5].
Furthermore, in the current study, we detected human STELLAR in the adult testis and ovary, whereas, in mice, stella is found in mouse ovary only. These differences could be attributed to more sensitive PCR assays used here or to specific differences in expression. It is well documented that GDF3 is differentially expressed between mice and humans [17, 21]. In particular, in mice, Gdf3 is found in multiple adult somatic tissues, whereas, in humans, GDF3 has only been identified in EC cells and is downregulated with differentiation [17]. The relative lack of amino acid identity at the 12p locus between mouse and humans is also interesting, particularly in light of the well-known phenomena that genes associated with sexual reproduction are more divergent than nonreproductive genes [22].
Although we currently do not know the functional roles of STELLAR, GDF3, and NANOG in gamete formation or differentiation, it is interesting that these three genes, which are germ cell enriched, share the property of amino acid divergence. OCT-4 has a higher amino acid identity (76%) to its mouse ortholog; however, this is still lower than the majority of human genes (50% of human genes have less than 10% amino acid divergence) [23]. As a consequence, it will be interesting to compare and contrast the functions of these divergent proteins in both mice and humans. The use of mouse and human ES cells may provide a useful model with which to perform this comparative functional analysis. The molecular machinery necessary for establishing the germ cell lineage in humans is almost completely unknown, and the signals necessary for inhibiting a somatic cell fate or promoting a human pluripotent germ cell have yet to be discovered. Our results suggest that genes whose expression is enriched in germ cells or human germ cell tumors and that largely lack expression in somatic tissues could provide a source of novel genes to explore central issues of stem cell pluripotency and self-renewal and germ cell differentiation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. C. Fuentealba, E. Eivers, D. Geissert, V. Taelman, and E. M. De Robertis Asymmetric mitosis: Unequal segregation of proteins destined for degradation PNAS, June 3, 2008; 105(22): 7732 - 7737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. John, O. L. Caballero, S. J. Svobodova, A. Kong, R. Chua, J. Browning, S. Fortunato, S. Deb, M. Hsu, C. A. Gedye, et al. ECSA/DPPA2 is an Embryo-Cancer Antigen that Is Coexpressed with Cancer-Testis Antigens in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3291 - 3298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. RAJPERT-DE MEYTS and C. E. HOEI-HANSEN From Gonocytes to Testicular Cancer: The Role of Impaired Gonadal Development Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2007; 1120(1): 168 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Allegrucci and L.E. Young Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 103 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Steiner, M. J. Engleka, Q. Lu, E. C. Piwarzyk, S. Yaklichkin, J. L. Lefebvre, J. W. Walters, L. Pineda-Salgado, P. A. Labosky, and D. S. Kessler FoxD3 regulation of Nodal in the Spemann organizer is essential for Xenopus dorsal mesoderm development Development, December 15, 2006; 133(24): 4827 - 4838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Houldsworth, J. E. Korkola, G. J. Bosl, and R. S. K. Chaganti Biology and Genetics of Adult Male Germ Cell Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2006; 24(35): 5512 - 5518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Rajpert-De Meyts Developmental model for the pathogenesis of testicular carcinoma in situ: genetic and environmental aspects Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2006; 12(3): 303 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Plaia, R. Josephson, Y. Liu, X. Zeng, C. Ording, A. Toumadje, S. N. Brimble, E. S. Sherrer, E. W. Uhl, W. J. Freed, et al. Characterization of a New NIH-Registered Variant Human Embryonic Stem Cell Line, BG01V: A Tool for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Stem Cells, March 1, 2006; 24(3): 531 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Turnpenny, C. M. Spalluto, R. M. Perrett, M. O'Shea, K. P. Hanley, I. T. Cameron, D. I. Wilson, and N. A. Hanley Evaluating Human Embryonic Germ Cells: Concord and Conflict as Pluripotent Stem Cells Stem Cells, February 1, 2006; 24(2): 212 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Korkola, J. Houldsworth, R. S.V. Chadalavada, A. B. Olshen, D. Dobrzynski, V. E. Reuter, G. J. Bosl, and R.S.K. Chaganti Down-Regulation of Stem Cell Genes, Including Those in a 200-kb Gene Cluster at 12p13.31, Is Associated with In vivo Differentiation of Human Male Germ Cell Tumors Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 820 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Elliman, I. Wu, and D. M. Kemp Adult Tissue-specific Expression of a Dppa3-derived Retrogene Represents a Postnatal Transcript of Pluripotent Cell Origin J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 16 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Pangas and A. Rajkovic Transcriptional regulation of early oogenesis: in search of masters Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 65 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Skottman, A.-M. Stromberg, E. Matilainen, J. Inzunza, O. Hovatta, and R. Lahesmaa Unique Gene Expression Signature by Human Embryonic Stem Cells Cultured Under Serum-Free Conditions Correlates with Their Enhanced and Prolonged Growth in an Undifferentiated Stage Stem Cells, January 1, 2006; 24(1): 151 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gu, D. LeMenuet, A. C.-K. Chung, M. Mancini, D. A. Wheeler, and A. J. Cooney Orphan Nuclear Receptor GCNF Is Required for the Repression of Pluripotency Genes during Retinoic Acid-Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(19): 8507 - 8519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Wiblin, W. Cui, A. J. Clark, and W. A. Bickmore Distinctive nuclear organisation of centromeres and regions involved in pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2005; 118(17): 3861 - 3868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hyslop, M. Stojkovic, L. Armstrong, T. Walter, P. Stojkovic, S. Przyborski, M. Herbert, A. Murdoch, T. Strachan, and M. Lako Downregulation of NANOG Induces Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells to Extraembryonic Lineages Stem Cells, September 1, 2005; 23(8): 1035 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Skottman, M. Mikkola, K. Lundin, C. Olsson, A.-M. Stromberg, T. Tuuri, T. Otonkoski, O. Hovatta, and R. Lahesmaa Gene Expression Signatures of Seven Individual Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Stem Cells, September 1, 2005; 23(9): 1343 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I. Skotheim, G. E. Lind, O. Monni, J. M. Nesland, V. M. Abeler, S. D. Fossa, N. Duale, G. Brunborg, O. Kallioniemi, P. W. Andrews, et al. Differentiation of Human Embryonal Carcinomas In vitro and In vivo Reveals Expression Profiles Relevant to Normal Development Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 65(13): 5588 - 5598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Deb-Rinker, D. Ly, A. Jezierski, M. Sikorska, and P. R. Walker Sequential DNA Methylation of the Nanog and Oct-4 Upstream Regions in Human NT2 Cells during Neuronal Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2005; 280(8): 6257 - 6260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pain, G.-W. Chirn, C. Strassel, and D. M. Kemp Multiple Retropseudogenes from Pluripotent Cell-specific Gene Expression Indicates a Potential Signature for Novel Gene Identification J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2005; 280(8): 6265 - 6268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|