Stem Cells http://www.epitomics.com
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Stem Cells Vol. 23 No. 7 August 2005, pp. 958 -964
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2004-0310; www.StemCells.com
© 2005 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fauza, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fauza, D. O.

Cartilage Engineering from Ovine Umbilical Cord Blood Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells

Julie R. Fuchsa,b,c, Didier Hannoucheb, Shinichi Teradab, Sarvenaz Zandb, Joseph P. Vacantib, Dario O. Fauzaa,c

a Children’s Hospital Boston,
b Massachusetts General Hospital,
c Harvard Medical School Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Key Words. Cord blood cells • Differentiation • Fetal stem cells • In vitro differentiation • Stem/progenitor cell • Stromal cells • TGF-ß1 • Tissue regeneration

Correspondence: Dario O. Fauza, M.D., Children’s Hospital Boston, Department of Surgery, Fegan 3, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Telephone: 617-919-2966; Fax: 617-730-0910; e-mail: dario.fauza{at}childrens.harvard.edu


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We aimed to determine whether three-dimensional (3D) cartilage could be engineered from umbilical cord blood (CB) cells and compare it with both engineered fetal cartilage and native tissue. Ovine mesenchymal progenitor cells were isolated from CB samples (n = 4) harvested at 80–120 days of gestation by low-density fractionation, expanded, and seeded onto polyglycolic acid scaffolds. Constructs (n = 28) were maintained in a rotating bioreactor with serum-free medium supplemented with transforming growth factor-ß1 for 4–12 weeks. Similar constructs seeded with fetal chondrocytes (n = 13) were cultured in parallel for 8 weeks. All specimens were analyzed and compared with native fetal cartilage samples (n = 10). Statistical analysis was by analysis of variance and Student’s t-test (p < .01). At 12 weeks, CB constructs exhibited chondrogenic differentiation by both standard and matrix-specific staining. In the CB constructs, there was a significant time-dependent increase in extracellular matrix levels of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and type-II collagen (C-II) but not of elastin (EL). Fetal chondrocyte and CB constructs had similar GAG and C-II contents, but CB constructs had less EL. Compared with both hyaline and elastic native fetal cartilage, C-II and EL levels were, respectively, similar and lower in the CB constructs, which had correspondingly lower and similar GAG levels than native hyaline and elastic fetal cartilage. We conclude that CB mesenchymal progenitor cells can be successfully used for the engineering of 3D cartilaginous tissue in vitro, displaying select histological and functional properties of both native and engineered fetal cartilage. Cartilage engineered from CB may prove useful for the treatment of select congenital anomalies.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Congenital anomalies always entail variable degrees of loss and/or malformation of tissues or organs. Treatment of the most severe cases is often limited by the scarce availability of normal grafts, especially at birth. Autologous grafting is frequently not an option in newborns due to donor-site size limitations. In addition, the well-known severe donor shortage observed in nearly all areas of transplantation is even more critical during the neonatal period. Prosthetic materials, on the other hand, may lead to infection, recurrence of the defect, and growth limitations. Recently, a novel concept in perinatal surgery was introduced, involving minimally invasive harvest of fetal tissue, which is then engineered in vitro in parallel to the remainder of gestation, so that an infant with a prenatally diagnosed birth defect can benefit from having autologous, expanded tissue readily available for surgical implantation in the neonatal period [1, 2].

Severe tracheal malformations and chest wall deformities are two examples in which engineered autologous cartilage readily available at birth, or even for prenatal repair, would be extremely beneficial, if not life-saving. We have previously shown in large animal models that tracheoplasty and chest wall reconstruction using cartilage engineered either from fetal chondrocytes or bone marrow mesenchymal cells may be viable alternatives for the treatment of these birth defects [35]. One of the limitations of these previous studies is that neither cell source (fetal auricular biopsy or bone marrow aspiration) is easily accessible. This study was aimed at determining whether three-dimensional (3D) cartilage could be engineered from a more accessible cell source, namely umbilical cord blood (CB), and at comparing it with both engineered fetal cartilage and native tissue.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The Harvard Medical School Animal Management Program is sanctioned by the American Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (file No. 000009) and meets National Institutes of Health standards as set forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council Publication, revised 1996). This study was approved under protocol No. 03354.

Cell and Tissue Harvest
Time-dated pregnant ewes at 80–120 days’ gestation were anesthetized with 2%–4% Halothane (Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, NJ, http://www.halocarbon.com). They received 1 g of cefazolin (Cefazolin; G.C. Hanford, Syracuse, NY, http://www.hanford.com) intravenously before surgical manipulation. The bicornuate uterus was exposed through a median longitudinal laparotomy and opened with electrocautery. Fetuses underwent either native cartilage or CB harvest. For native cartilage harvest, the fetal head and neck were exposed. Elastic (n = 7) or hyaline (n = 6) cartilage specimens were then harvested from, respectively, an ear or tracheal rings. For CB harvest, the umbilical cord was exposed and the umbilical vein was cannulated and aspirated using a 22-gauge needle. Approximately 10 ml of CB (n = 4 samples) was collected into high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, BRL/Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, http://www.invitrogen.com/content.cfm?pageid=1) containing 5% preservative-free heparin (Elkins Sinn, Cherry Hill, NJ). All samples were transported on ice and processed within 4 hours after harvest. The gestational membranes and uterine wall were closed in one layer with a reusable TA 90-mm titanium surgical stapler (United States Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, CT, http://www.ussurg.com). The mother’s abdomen was closed in layers.

Cell Isolation and Culture
The cartilage specimens were minced and subsequently digested with 0.2% type II collagenase (Worthington Biochemical, Lake View, NJ, http://www.worthington-biochem.com/default.html) for 5 hours in a 37°C water bath. After passage through a 70-µm mesh (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, http://www.bd.com), chondrocytes were plated and expanded in Ham’s F-12 (Gibco), with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma, St. Louis, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com), 5 µg/ml ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (Sigma), and an antimicrobial solution containing 10,000 U/ml penicillin, 10 mg/ml streptomycin, and 25 µg/ml amphotericin B (all from Gibco).

Mononuclear cells were isolated from the CB samples by low-density fractionation/density-gradient centrifugation using Hystopaque (Sigma). Briefly, CB samples were filtered through a 100-µm mesh (BD Falcon, Bedford, MA, http://www.bdbiosciences.com/discovery_labware) and then centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 5 minutes. The resulting pellet was resuspended with 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Gibco). The cell suspension was then added to the top of Hystopaque 1077 (Sigma), and the combination was centrifuged at 2,200 rpm for 30 minutes to obtain the mononuclear cell fraction. The interface between the hystopaque and plasma below was carefully recovered with a pipette and placed in a separate centrifuge tube. The remaining hystopaque, plasma, and red blood cell pellet were discarded. Cells were then washed with PBS and centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 5 minutes twice, after which they were resuspended in growth/expansion medium and plated into a 25-cm2 flask (Corning, Inc., Corning, NY, http://www.corning.com) at a density of approximately 2 µ 106 per cm2. Growth medium consisted of high-glucose DMEM (Gibco), 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma), and an antibiotic solution containing 10,000 U/ml penicillin G sodium and 10,000 µG/ml streptomycin sulfate (both from Gibco). After 72 hours, non-adherent cells were removed and the medium was replaced. The remaining adherent cells were expanded in vitro.

All cells were maintained in a 95% humidified, 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C and expanded every 4–6 days at a ratio of 1:2 when at least approximately 80% confluent. Cell detachment was achieved using 0.05% trypsin and 0.53 mM EDTA (Cellgro, Herndon, VA, http://www.cellgro.com) for 5 minutes at 37°C. Cells were passaged 5 to 10 times to achieve enough numbers for seeding into multiple constructs obtained from each cell donor (below).

Construct Assembly
Biodegradable scaffolds (0.5–1 cm2) were used, composed of nonwoven, 2-mm-thick, 70-mg/ml polyglycolic acid polymer (Albany International, Mansfield, MA, http://www.albint.com) treated with 3% poly-L-lactic acid solution (Sigma). Before cell seeding, scaffolds were treated with 1 N NaOH for 1 minute, washed with distilled water, and then coated with 1% collagen solution (Vitrogen Angiotech BioMaterials Corp. [formerly Cohesion Technologies, Inc.], Palo Alto, CA, http://www.cohesiontech.com) for 12 hours at 4°C to enhance cell attachment. Scaffolds were then statically or dynamically seeded at 60 million per cm2 density with either fetal chondrocytes or mesenchymal progenitor cells. Static seeding was performed by suspending the cells in 200 µl of medium. In a six-well plate (Becton, Dickinson and Company), one half of the cells were seeded on the upper surface of the scaffold placed and allowed to attach in the incubator at 37°C for 30 minutes. The construct was then inverted, and the remaining cells were seeded in an identical fashion. After 30 minutes, 5 ml of medium was added to the well and changed daily for 3 days. For dynamic seeding, scaffolds were suspended in a magnetically stirred flask containing the cell suspension (Wheaton, Charlotte, NC) for 3 days at 37°C.

All constructs were subsequently maintained in 50-ml polystyrene centrifuge tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company) in a rotating hybridization oven, or bioreactor (Thermo Electron, Franklin, MA, http://www.thermohybaid.com) at 37°C and 5 rpm. Chondrocyte-based constructs were kept in the same medium used for cell expansion for 6–8 weeks. CB constructs were maintained in serum-free, defined chondrogenic medium for either 4 (n = 8), 8 (n = 8), or 12 (n = 12) weeks, totaling 28 constructs. There were no significant differences in the number of constructs generated from each of the four donors and in their relative distribution among the three different time points. The medium consisted of high-glucose DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with the following: 10–7 M dexamethasone (Sigma), 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (Sigma), antibiotic solution containing 10,000 U/ml penicillin G sodium and 10,000 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate (Gibco), 8 ng/ml transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, http://www.rndsystems.com), 100 µg/ml sodium pyruvate (Sigma), 40 µg/ ml L-proline (Sigma), and insulin transferrin selenium-plus (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, http://www.bdbiosciences.com/index.shtml) at the final concentrations of 6.25 µg/ml bovine insulin, 6.25 µg/ml transferrin, 6.25 µg/ml selenious acid, 5.33 µg/ml linoleic acid, and 1.25 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, as previously described [6].

Engineered and Native Tissue Analysis

Histology   Specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Sigma), paraffin embedded, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), safranin O, and toluidine blue. Resulting slides were examined using an Axiophot light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany, http://www.zeiss.com).

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for types I, II, and X collagen, using the primary monoclonal antibodies I-8H5 and II-4C11 (both from Accurate Chemical & Scientific Corp., Westbury, NY, http://www.accuratechemical.com/accuratechemical) and a polyclonal antibody to deer antler type X collagen (from Dr. Gary Gibson, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit) [7], respectively. After incubation with the primary antibodies, immunostaining was detected colorimetrically using a labeled streptavidin biotin kit, with 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole as the chromagen (DakoCytomation, Carpenteria, CA, http://www.dakocytomation.com), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma), coverslipped, and analyzed using an Axiophot light microscope (Carl Zeiss).

Quantitative DNA and Matrix Analyses   Samples were lyophilized for 8 hours and weighed. Engineered constructs were minced and native cartilage specimens were sliced into small pieces using a cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany, http://www.leica-microsystems.com/website/lms.nsf).

For the DNA assay, samples were incubated in a proteinase K solution (Sigma) at 55°C for 16 hours. Hoechst 33258 dye solution (Sigma) was used to measure total DNA content under a spectrofluorometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA, http://www.turnerdesigns.com) as previously described [8].

For quantitation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), each sample was mixed with a 4-M guanidine solution (Sigma) and placed on an orbital shaker at 4°C for 48 hours. Digested samples were dialyzed using a 15-kDa cut-off cellulose membrane (Spectrum Laboratories, Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA, http://www.spectrapor.com) against a bath of distilled water for 12 hours to remove acid. GAG content was measured spectrophotometrically (Hewlett-Packard, Andover, MA, http://www.hp.com) using a dimethylmethylene blue dye [9] and the Blyscan assay kit (Bio-color, Ltd., Belfast, U.K., http://www.biocolor.co.uk), with a chondroitin sulfate standard.

During the GAG extraction process, acid-soluble collagen (mainly type I) was simultaneously extracted [9]. The remaining samples contained type II, or pepsin-soluble, collagen. Therefore, the samples were subsequently digested with 1% (wt/vol) pepsin (Sigma) in 0.5 M acetic acid (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, https://www1.fishersci.com/index.jsp) on an orbital shaker at 4°C for 24 hours. Type II collagen content was measured spectrophotometrically (Hewlett-Packard) using a collagen dye reagent [10] and the Sircol assay kit (Biocolor), with a provided collagen standard containing 1 µg/µl.

To measure elastin (EL) content, samples were incubated in 0.25 M oxalic acid (Sigma) at 95°C for 1 hour and then cooled to room temperature. This process was repeated four times. Digested samples were then dialyzed using a 3.5-kDa cut-off cellulose membrane (Slide-A-Lyzer Mini Dialysis Unit; Pierce, Rockford, IL, http://www.piercenet.com) against a bath of distilled water for 12 hours to remove acid. EL content was measured spectrophotometrically (Hewlett-Packard) using an EL dye reagent [11] and the Fastin assay kit (Biocolor) with a standard containing {alpha}-EL.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test using commercially available software (InStat; GraphPad Software, San Diego, http://www.graphpad.com). Taking into account the multiple comparisons between groups, p values of less than .01 were considered significant.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell Morphology
Isolated, adherent CB cells displayed fibroblast-like morphology in culture (Fig. 1Go). Sparsely distributed colonies were visible in the original culture after 7–10 days in growth medium. By 14–21 days, these colonies extended toward each other to approximately 80% confluence.



View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Phase-contrast micrograph of fetal mesenchymal progenitor cells isolated from umbilical cord blood (original magnification x20).

 
Construct Analysis

Histology   On H&E, CB constructs displayed no evidence of chondrogenic differentiation after 4 weeks in the bioreactor (Fig. 2Go). After 8 weeks, cell lacunae and basophilic staining were present in the extracellular matrix, in a morphological pattern compatible with ongoing chondrogenesis (Fig. 2Go). After 12 weeks, CB constructs exhibited evident chondrogenic differentiation by both standard and matrix-specific staining, displaying characteristics of hyaline cartilage, both grossly and microscopically (Figs. 2Go, 3Go). At that time point, each construct also contained a multicellular peripheral layer of flattened, elongated, fibroblast-like cells similar to normal perichondrium (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Time-dependent changes in three-dimensional umbilical cord blood mesenchymal progenitor cell constructs under defined chondrogenic medium in a bioreactor. (A): At 4 weeks, without any evidence of chondrogenic differentiation. (B): At 8 weeks, with preliminary evidence of cartilage formation, including cell lacunae and basophilic matrix staining. (C): At 12 weeks, with clear cartilage-like morphology. (D): At 12 weeks, showing a peripheral multicellular layer of flattened, elongated, fibroblast-like cells, analogous to perichondrium. (E): Native fetal hyaline cartilage from the trachea. All hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification x20.

 


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Matrix-specific stainings of three-dimensional cartilage engineered from umbilical cord blood mesenchymal progenitor cells. (A): Safranin O (for glycosaminoglycans). (B): Toluidine blue (for glycosaminoglycans). (C): Immunohistochemical staining for type I collagen, showing only peripheral positivity. (D): Immunohistochemical staining for type II collagen, showing positivity throughout the matrix. Original magnification x20.

 
Further qualitative analysis of the extracellular matrix showed that CB constructs stained positively for the GAG-specific stains safranin O and toluidine blue, also in a pattern comparable with hyaline cartilage (Fig. 3Go). Immunostaining for type II collagen showed its presence throughout the constructs (Fig. 3Go). On the other hand, immunostaining for type I collagen revealed positivity only on the periphery of the constructs, in the perichondrium-like layer (Fig. 3Go). Native fetal hyaline cartilage specimens were essentially negative for type I collagen. Type X collagen was not detected in any of the constructs, whereas minimal staining was present at the border of endochondral ossification in the native specimens.

Quantitative Matrix Analysis   There was a significant time-dependent increase in the levels of GAG and type II collagen (C-II) but not of EL in CB constructs (Fig. 4Go). The following quantitative analyses refer to CB constructs at the 12-week time point. There were no significant differences in GAG and C-II levels between CB and fetal chondrocyte constructs, which, however, had higher EL levels. Compared with native fetal cartilage (both hyaline and elastic), C-II and EL levels were, respectively, similar and lower in the CB constructs. Native hyaline cartilage had higher GAG levels than CB constructs, which showed GAG contents comparable with those of native elastic cartilage. There were no differences in the results from each of the four donors within each time point.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Quantitative extracellular matrix comparisons of different forms of engineered and native fetal cartilages. (A): Umbilical CB mesenchymal progenitor cell constructs (CB constructs) at different time points. (B): CB constructs versus chondrocyte-derived constructs. (C): CB constructs versus native elastic and hyaline cartilages. *Significant difference between the groups (p < .01). Abbreviations: C-II, type II collagen; CB, cord blood; GAG, glycosaminoglycan.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bone marrow–derived stromal cells (BMSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), or mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) are well characterized, pluripotent cells that can be isolated from adult bone marrow, expanded, and induced to terminally differentiate into osteocytes, chondrocytes, adipocytes, tenocytes, myotubes, and hematopoietic-supporting stroma, among other cell types [12]. These cells can self-renew, engraft in numerous organs, and differentiate along tissue-specific lineages in vivo [13]. They have been shown to improve engraftment of donor hematopoietic cells after cotransplantation and have been used clinically to regenerate marrow stroma after myeloablative treatment, as well as to increase bone density in osteogenesis imperfecta [14, 15]. BMSCs have also been used for the engineering of 3D cartilaginous tissue in vitro [4, 16]. In a previous study, we have shown that cartilage engineered from BMSCs could be successfully used in an experimental model of fetal tracheal repair [4].

The surgical treatment of select congenital anomalies, such as tracheal defects, with cartilage engineered from autologous BMSCs, however, would imply the need for a fetal bone marrow biopsy, which would be considerably invasive. Additionally, both the expansion potential and phenotype of BMSCs are known to change with age, even in the fetus [12, 17]. Recent studies have reported the presence of MPCs in CB and even peripheral blood [1820]. Campagnoli et al. [18] and Lee et al. [19] have shown that, under suitable conditions, CB MPCs can differentiate into chondrocytes, among other cells. To our knowledge, this is the first report of 3D cartilage engineered in vitro from CB MPCs.

In the present study, we successfully isolated MPCs from ovine CB. A limitation of this experiment was the fact that it was not possible to perform a detailed phenotypical analysis of these cells due to the well-known lack of ovine cross reactivity of the commercially available antibodies to identify reported MPC markers through fluorescence-activated cell sorting. However, the fact that these cells were obtained through the techniques previously described for selective MPC isolation from blood, combined with their easy expansion in a dedicated culture medium for mesenchymal cells as well as their ability to produce cartilage, point to the fact that they were of a mesenchymal nature. To our knowledge, no other cell type could have led to these results. Engineered cartilaginous constructs derived from these cells displayed morphological characteristics comparable to those of native fetal hyaline cartilage and of engineered fetal chondrocyte-derived cartilage, both on gross inspection and histologically. Quantitatively, however, the extracellular matrix profile of CB constructs was unique, with select differences compared with fetal chondrocyte-derived constructs and either hyaline or elastic native cartilage. In our system, CB cells were first grown in monolayer culture and then transferred to a 3D polymer scaffold and maintained in a rotating bioreactor. One could speculate that the ability of the CB MPCs to produce large amounts of EL may never have developed during the monolayer culture phase or that it might have eventually surfaced in 3D culture had the study been carried out to further time points. The significance and applicability of such matrix deposition differences are to be assessed in upcoming in vivo experiments.

Somewhat unexpectedly in our study, the CB MPCs required up to 12 weeks to clearly differentiate into cartilaginous tissue. Previously reported differentiation of BMSCs by micromass culture using TGF-ß1 required only 5 days [6], whereas differentiation of these cells on press-coated polylactic acid polymer blocks took not more than 3 weeks [16]. The relatively large size of our constructs (1 cm2) compared with what was achieved in these BMSC studies may have contributed to our findings. The polymer that we used (polyglycolic acid), as well as the unique seeding and bioreactor conditions, may have also played a role. Indeed, the time course of matrix deposition and cartilage formation using CB MPCs correlated with our previous findings using similar seeding and culture techniques with ovine BMSCs [4]. It has been recently shown that TGF-ß2 and TGF-ß3, independently or in combination, are superior to TGF-ß1 as a means to induce chondrogenic response in MSCs [2123]. It is reasonable to speculate that these other isoforms of TGF-ß could lead to an improved engineered cartilage, should the CB cells be exposed to them as opposed to TGF-ß1, but this remains to be determined.

Our data suggest that CB could be a somewhat easily accessible source of autologous MPCs for cartilage engineering, at least in this ovine model. Although MPCs have been isolated from human CB at different stages of gestation, it remains to be determined whether their density and stage of differentiation are suitable for 3D cartilage engineering, as shown herein [18, 19]. For example, there are well-known interspecies differences in both the cellular and fluid make-up of human and ovine amniotic fluid [24]. Conceivably, analogous differences could also apply to MPCs present in CB.

Although certainly invasive, cordocentesis can be considered a fairly safe procedure in experienced hands [25, 26]. Previous studies on the isolation of MPCs from CB samples have shown that the timing of harvest impacts on the ability to isolate these cells, with a declining cell yield with advancing gestation [18, 27]. Collection of term CB at delivery is, of course, without any risk to the mother or fetus; however, it remains to be determined whether MPCs can be consistently isolated in sizeable amounts from this source. Finally, fetal cells have been isolated from the maternal circulation for diagnostic purposes [28, 29]. Whether fetal MPCs/MSCs can be isolated from peripheral maternal blood and used for tissue engineering is an intriguing question yet to be answered.

Despite the need for further investigation, as discussed above, the present data show that circulating fetal MPCs can be used for the engineering of 3D cartilaginous tissue in vitro, displaying select histological and functional properties of both native and engineered fetal cartilage. Cartilage engineered from CB may prove useful in the surgical treatment of severe congenital anomalies such as tracheal and chest wall defects.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study was funded by a grant from the Harvard Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery and by the Children’s Hospital Boston Surgical Foundation.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Fauza DO, Fishman SJ, Mehegan K et al. Videofetoscopically assisted fetal tissue engineering: bladder augmentation. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:7–12.[CrossRef][Medline]

  2. Fauza DO. Fetal tissue engineering. In: Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti JP, eds. Principles of Tissue Engineering. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000:353–368.

  3. Fuchs JR, Terada S, Ochoa ER et al. Fetal tissue engineering: in utero tracheal augmentation in an ovine model. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:1000–1006.[CrossRef][Medline]

  4. Fuchs JR, Hannouche D, Terada S et al. Fetal tracheal augmentation with cartilage engineered from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:984–987.[CrossRef][Medline]

  5. Fuchs JR, Terada S, Hannouche D et al. Fetal tissue engineering: chest wall reconstruction. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1188–1193.[CrossRef][Medline]

  6. Yoo JU, Barthel TS, Nishimura K et al. The chondrogenic potential of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1745–1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Niyibizi C, Sagarrigo Visconti C, Gibson G et al. Identification and immunolocalization of type X collagen at the ligament-bone interface. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996;222:584–589.[CrossRef][Medline]

  8. Kim YJ, Sah RL, Doong JY et al. Fluorometric assay of DNA in cartilage explants using Hoechst 33258. Anal Biochem 1988;174:168–176.[CrossRef][Medline]

  9. Farndale RW, Buttle DJ, Barrett AJ. Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986;883:173–177.[Medline]

  10. Madsen K, von der Mark K, van Menxel M et al. Analysis of collagen types synthesized by rabbit ear cartilage chondrocytes in vivo and in vitro. Biochem J 1984;221:189–196.[Medline]

  11. Brown AN, Kim BS, Alsberg E et al. Combining chondrocytes and smooth muscle cells to engineer hybrid soft tissue constructs. Tissue Eng 2000;6:297–305.[CrossRef][Medline]

  12. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143–147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Liechty KW, MacKenzie TC, Shaaban AF et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation after in utero transplantation in sheep. Nat Med 2000;6:1282–1286.[CrossRef][Medline]

  14. Almeida-Porada G, Flake AW, Glimp HA et al. Cotransplantation of stroma results in enhancement of engraftment and early expression of donor hematopoietic stem cells in utero. Exp Hematol 1999;27:1569–1575.[CrossRef][Medline]

  15. Horwitz EM, Prockop DJ, Fitzpatrick LA et al. Transplantability and therapeutic effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med 1999;5:309–313.[CrossRef][Medline]

  16. Noth U, Tuli R, Osyczka AM et al. In vitro engineered cartilage constructs produced by press-coating biodegradable polymer with human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng 2002;8:131–144.[CrossRef][Medline]

  17. In ’t Anker PS, Scherjon SA, Kleijburg-van der Keur C et al. Amniotic fluid as a novel source of mesenchymal stem cells for therapeutic transplantation. Blood 2003;102:1548–1549.[Free Full Text]

  18. Campagnoli C, Roberts IA, Kumar S et al. Identification of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human first-trimester fetal blood, liver, and bone marrow. Blood 2001;98:2396–2402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Lee OK, Kuo TK, Chen WM et al. Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood 2004;103:1669–1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Zvaifler NJ, Marinova-Mutafchieva L, Adams G et al. Mesenchymal precursor cells in the blood of normal individuals. Arthritis Res 2000;2:477–488.[CrossRef][Medline]

  21. Barry F, Boynton RE, Liu B et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow: differentiation-dependent gene expression of matrix components. Exp Cell Res 2001;268:189–200.[CrossRef][Medline]

  22. Kojima K, Ignotz RA, Kushibiki T et al. Tissue-engineered trachea from sheep marrow stromal cells with transforming growth factor beta2 released from biodegradable microspheres in a nude rat recipient. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:147–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Indrawattana N, Chen G, Tadokoro M et al. Growth factor combination for chondrogenic induction from human mesenchymal stem cell. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;320:914–919.[CrossRef][Medline]

  24. Albuquerque CA, Nijland MJ, Ross MG. Human and ovine amniotic fluid composition differences: implications for fluid dynamics. J Matern Fetal Med 1999;8:123–129.[CrossRef][Medline]

  25. Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Kunavikatikul C et al. Fetal loss rate associated with cordocentesis at midgestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:719–723.[CrossRef][Medline]

  26. Abdel-Fattah SA, Bartha JL, Kyle PM et al. Safety of fetal blood sampling by cordocentesis in fetuses with single umbilical arteries. Prenat Diagn 2004;24:605–608.[CrossRef][Medline]

  27. Wexler SA, Donaldson C, Denning-Kendall P et al. Adult bone marrow is a rich source of human mesenchymal "stem" cells but umbilical cord and mobilized adult blood are not. Br J Haematol 2003;121:368–374.[CrossRef][Medline]

  28. Bianchi DW. Fetal cells in the mother: from genetic diagnosis to diseases associated with fetal cell microchimerism. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;92:103–108.[CrossRef][Medline]

  29. Bianchi DW, Simpson JL, Jackson LG et al. Fetal gender and aneuploidy detection using fetal cells in maternal blood: analysis of NIFTY I data. National Institute of Child Health and Development Fetal Cell Isolation Study. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:609–615.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received November 9, 2004; accepted for publication March 17, 2005.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
D Mrugala, C Bony, N Neves, L Caillot, S Fabre, D Moukoko, C Jorgensen, and D Noel
Phenotypic and functional characterisation of ovine mesenchymal stem cells: application to a cartilage defect model
Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2008; 67(3): 288 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fauza, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fauza, D. O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS
http://www.peprotech.com/