Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online July 5, 2007
Stem Cells Vol. 25 No. 10 October 2007, pp. 2460 -2468
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0059; www.StemCells.com
© 2007 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2007-0059v1
25/10/2460    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kafienah, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hollander, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kafienah, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hollander, A. P.

TISSUE-SPECIFIC STEM CELLS

Pharmacological Regulation of Adult Stem Cells: Chondrogenesis Can Be Induced Using a Synthetic Inhibitor of the Retinoic Acid Receptor

Wael Kafienah, Sanjay Mistry, Mark J. Perry, Galatia Politopoulou, Anthony P. Hollander

Academic Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Science at North Bristol, University of Bristol, United Kingdom

Key Words. Nuclear receptor • Stem cell • Retinoic acid receptor • Cartilage • Tissue engineering

Correspondence: Anthony Hollander, Ph.D., University of Bristol Academic Rheumatology, AMBI, Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, U.K. Telephone: 44-117-959-5918; Fax: 44-117-959-6187; e-mail: a.hollander{at}bristol.ac.uk

Received on January 24, 2007; accepted for publication on June 22, 2007.

First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS  July 5, 2007.

    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Conventional methods for regulating the differentiation of stem cells are largely based on the use of biological agents such as growth factors. We hypothesize that stem cell differentiation could be driven by specific synthetic molecules. If true, this would offer the possibility of screening chemical libraries to develop pharmacological agents with improved efficacy. To test our hypothesis, we have determined which, if any, of the nuclear receptor superfamily might be involved in chondrogenesis. We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting, as well as quantitative polymerase chain reaction, to study expression of a range of nuclear receptors in the undifferentiated mesenchymal population and after growth factor-driven differentiation of these cells to chondrocytes. In this way, we identified retinoic acid receptor β (RARβ) as a potential pharmacological target. A low molecular weight synthetic inhibitor of the RAR{alpha} and RARβ receptors was able to induce chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from osteoarthritis patients, in the absence of serum and growth factors. Furthermore, the pathway is independent of SOX9 upregulation and does not lead to hypertrophy. When mesenchymal cells were seeded on to polyglycolic acid scaffolds and cultured with LE135, there was a dose-dependent formation of cartilage, demonstrated both histologically and by biochemical analysis of the collagen component of the extracellular matrix. These results demonstrate the feasibility of a pharmacological approach to the regulation of stem cell function.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
There is a growing interest in using adult stem cells for the repair of cartilage lesions [1]. This requires well-defined and efficient protocols for directing the differentiation of stem cells into the chondrogenic lineage. A number of groups have explored the use of adherent bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) for the generation of chondrocytes [2]. These are multipotent cells with a greater proliferative capacity than most other somatic cells [3, 4]. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) can be used to drive chondrogenesis of BMSCs [5, 6], and this occurs through activation of chondrogenic markers such as SOX9 [7, 8], type II collagen, and aggrecan [4], as well as type X collagen [1, 4], a marker of hypertrophy that is normally absent from hyaline cartilage [9]. Until now, there has been no report of the replacement of TGF-β using pharmacological agents.

An intact articular cartilage surface is essential for normal joint function [9]. Loss of articular cartilage is a well-described feature of osteoarthritis [912] and is a result of the lack of any intrinsic repair capacity, presumably because it is an avascular tissue [13, 14]. Despite intensive research into the use of proteinase inhibitors to prevent cartilage loss in osteoarthritis [15], no effective pharmaceutical therapies have emerged [16, 17]. A pharmacological strategy directed at activation of endogenous stem cells requires those cells to have the capacity to respond appropriately. We have recently demonstrated that BMSCs derived from elderly osteoarthritis patients retain the capacity to produce cartilage when activated by TGF-β [1]. This raises the possibility that BMSCs from these patients will also respond to pharmacological signals.

Established strategies for regulating the differentiation of stem cells include the use of specific cytokines and growth factors, manipulation of culture conditions, and coculture with tissue-derived differentiated cells [3, 6, 18]. With each of these approaches, there are limited opportunities for improving efficacy and few chances, if any, of creating drugs that can be administered systemically to recruit stem cells in vivo. Identification of synthetic molecules that can drive stem cell differentiation will offer the possibility of screening chemical libraries to identify the most effective molecules that could then be formulated for systemic activity.

Nuclear receptors are ligand-activated transcription factors that play a central role in the growth and differentiation of tissues [19]. The class I subfamily includes thyroid hormone receptor, retinoic acid receptor (RAR), vitamin D receptor, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR). Other subfamily classes encompass variant retinoic acid receptors (retinoic acid X receptor [RXR] and retinoid Z receptor [RZR]) and estrogen receptors (ER{alpha} and ERβ) [19]. There is little information on nuclear receptor involvement in the process of stem cell differentiation through the chondrogenic lineage. A comprehensive and systematic analysis of the role of nuclear receptors in chondrocyte formation from stem cells is essential to learn how to regulate this process pharmacologically for therapeutic stem cell delivery or for in vivo manipulation of stem cells. The aim of this study was to investigate the nuclear receptor superfamily as a possible target for pharmacological induction of stem cell chondrogenesis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Isolation and Expansion of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells
BMSCs were harvested from bone marrow plugs taken from the femoral heads of five osteoarthritis patients (two male, three female; mean age, 53.8; range, 31–79) undergoing hip replacement. All patients gave their informed consent, and the study was carried out according to local ethical guidelines. Only patients being treated with standard analgesics were included in the study. Cells were suspended in stem cell medium consisting of low-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, http://www.hyclone.com), 1% (vol/vol) GlutaMAX (1x; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, http://www.invitrogen.com), and 1% (vol/vol) penicillin (100 U/ml)/streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (Invitrogen). The serum batch was selected to promote the growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells [20]. The cell suspension was separated from any bone in the sample by repeated washing with medium, the suspension being drawn off using a 20-ml syringe/19-gauge needle. The cells were centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes, and the supernatant and fat were removed. The resulting cell pellet was resuspended in medium and then plated at a seeding density of between 5 and 10 million cells per 175-cm2 flask. These flasks were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. Four days were allowed before the first medium change, and then the medium was changed every other day until adherent cells reached 90% confluence and were ready for passaging.

Analysis of BMSC Cell-Surface Mesenchymal Marker Epitopes by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
The cells were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at a concentration of approximately 100,000 cells per milliliter, fixed in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 10 minutes, and washed with PBS. Nonspecific antigens were blocked by incubating the cells at room temperature for 1 hour in a blocking solution containing 1% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS) (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10% (vol/vol) human serum (Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were washed by centrifugation in 3 volumes of PBS, and the cell pellet was suspended in 100 µl of a primary antibody solution containing 20–100 µg/ml of antibody in blocking solution. After incubation for 40 minutes at 4°C, the cells were washed in PBS. All the primary antibodies were mouse anti-human, obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, http://www.rndsystems.com). For an isotype control, nonspecific mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) was substituted for the primary antibody. For antibodies that required a second antibody for detection, the cells were incubated under the same conditions for 20 minutes with anti-mouse IgG labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark, http://www.dako.com). The cells were then washed in PBS and suspended in 1 ml of PBS for analysis on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, http://www.bd.com). Positive expression was defined as the level of fluorescence greater than that of 95% of corresponding isotype-matched control antibodies.

Analysis of Nuclear Receptors by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
BMSCs from passage 2 or 3 were trypsinized and suspended in PBS at a concentration of approximately 100,000 cells per milliliter, fixed in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 10 minutes, and washed with PBS. The cells were rinsed with cold 150 mM sodium citrate solution and then incubated with a membrane permeabilization solution (0.5% [vol/vol] saponin in PBS) for 30 minutes at 37°C with occasional mixing. Nonspecific antigens were blocked by incubating the cells at room temperature for 1 hour in a blocking solution containing 1% (wt/vol) BSA, 5% (vol/vol) FCS (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10% (vol/vol) human serum (Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were washed by centrifugation in 3 volumes of PBS, and the cell pellet was suspended in 100 µl of a primary antibody solution containing 20–100 µg/ml of antibody in blocking solution. After incubation for 40 minutes at 4°C, the cells were washed in PBS. Nuclear receptor primary antibodies were all mouse or rabbit anti-human antibodies obtained from Affinity BioReagents (Golden, CO, http://www.bioreagents.com) (PPAR{alpha}, PPAR{delta}, and RXRβ) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, http://www.scbt.com; PPAR{gamma}, RAR{alpha}, RARβ, RAR{gamma}, RXR{alpha}, and RXR{gamma}). For an isotype control, nonspecific mouse or rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) was substituted for the primary antibody. For antibodies that required a second antibody for detection, the cells were incubated under the same conditions for 20 minutes with anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG labeled with FITC (DAKO). The cells were then washed in PBS and suspended in 1 ml of PBS for analysis on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). Positive expression was defined as the level of fluorescence greater than that of 95% of corresponding isotype-matched control antibodies.

RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription
RNA was extracted from cell cultures using Invitrogen's ChargeSwitch Total RNA kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription (RT) was carried out using the Superscript III system (Invitrogen). Total RNA (2 µg) was reverse-transcribed in a 20-µl reaction volume containing Superscript III (200 U), random primers (25 µM), and dNTP (0.5 mM each) at 50°C for 60 minutes.

Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed as described recently [1]. A 25-µl reaction consisted of 12.5 µl of the SYBR Green Ex-Taq Premix (Takara, Otsu, Japan, http://www.takara.co.jp), 5 µl of the RT reaction mixture, and 300 nM primers using the Smart Cycler II System (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, http://www.cepheid.com). The amplification program consisted of initial denaturation at 95°C (2 minutes) followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C (15 seconds) and annealing/extension at 58°C (30 seconds). After amplification, melt analysis was performed by heating the reaction mixture from 60°C to 95°C at a rate of 0.2°C/second. The cycle threshold (Ct) value for each gene of interest was measured for each RT sample. The Ct value for β-actin was used as an endogenous reference for normalization. Real-time RT-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were done in duplicate or triplicate and repeated two to four times. Specific primers for human nuclear receptors were purchased from SuperArray (Frederick, MD, http://www.superarray.com; proprietary primers, sequence not disclosed). Primers were checked for product size and absence of primer dimers using gel electrophoresis (data not shown). Primers for cartilage-specific genes were designed and optimized as previously described [1]. The sequence of the primers used was as follows: SOX9 (forward [F]), CTTTGGTTTGTGTTCGTGTTTTG; SOX9 (reverse [R]), AGAGAAAGAAAAAGGGAAAGGTAAG-TTT; Aggrecan (F), AGGGCGAGTGGAATGATGTT; Aggrecan (R), GGTGGCTGTGCCCTTTTTAC; Collagen X {alpha} (F), GACACAGTTC-TTCATTCCCTACAC; Collagen X {alpha}1 (R), GCAACCCTGGCTCT-CCTT; Collagen II {alpha}1 (A+B) (F), CAACACTGCCAACGTCCAGAT; Collagen II {alpha}1 (A+B) (R), CTGCTTCGTCCAGATAGGCAAT; β-Actin (F), GACAGGATGCAGAAGGAGATTACT; β-Actin (R), TG-ATCCACATCTGCTGGAAGGT.

Chondrogenic Monolayer Cultures Using BMSCs
Expanded BMSCs were plated at 100,000 cells per well in a six-well plate and allowed to adhere for 24 hours. Chondrogenic differentiation was stimulated by adding differentiation medium consisting of DMEM containing 4.5 g/l glucose supplemented with 10 ng/ml TGF-β3 (R&D Systems) or RARβ antagonist (LE135; Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, U.K., http://www.tocris.com) at the indicated concentrations, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid-2-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 x 10–7 M dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS) (Invitrogen), and 1% (vol/vol) penicillin (100 U/ml)/streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (Invitrogen). Medium was changed every 2–3 days. Differentiated cells were harvested at 3 or 6 days for mRNA analysis.

Tissue Engineering Using BMSCs
Three-dimensional cartilage engineering was carried out essentially as described earlier [1]. Briefly, polyglycholic acid (PGA) scaffolds (a kind gift from Dr. James Huckle, Smith & Nephew, York, U.K.) produced as 5-mm-diameter x 2-mm-thick discs were presoaked in 100 µg/ml human fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS to support BMSC adherence to PGA fibers. BMSCs from passage 2 or 3 were trypsinized and suspended in 30 µl of expansion medium. The suspension was loaded dropwise onto the scaffold in tissue culture wells precoated with 1% (wt/vol) agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) to prevent cell adherence to plastic. The constructs were maintained in chondrogenic differentiation medium, as described above for monolayer cultures. After the first week the medium was further supplemented with 50 µg/ml insulin (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, http://www.peprotech.com) until the end of culture. The medium was changed three times a week. The constructs were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 on a rotating platform at 50 rpm for 3 weeks. Harvested samples were digested with collagenase to release the cells, which were stored at –70°C for subsequent RNA extraction. Other samples were stored at –20°C prior to quantitative biochemical analysis (see below).

Osteogenic Cultures
BMSCs were plated at 1,000 cells per cm2 in 2-cm2 wells and grown to 50%–70% confluence. For positive controls, they were then incubated in osteogenic medium containing 10–8 M dexamethasone, 0.2 mM ascorbic acid, and 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich). LE135 at 0.1 and 1.0 µM was used in place of β-glycerophosphate where indicated. Negative controls were cultured with no stimulus. In all cultures, the medium was replaced every 3–4 days for a period of 21 days. The cells were then washed with PBS, fixed in a solution of ice-cold 70% ethanol for 1 hour, and stained for 10 minutes with 1 ml of 40 mM alizarin red (pH 4.1; Sigma-Aldrich).

Adipogenic Cultures
For adipogenic differentiation, 50%–70% confluent BMSCs were incubated in complete medium supplemented, in positive control cultures, with 0.5 µM hydrocortisone, 0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine, and 60 µM indomethacin (all from Sigma-Aldrich). These supplements were replaced with 0.1 and 1.0 µM LE135 where indicated. Negative controls were cultured with no stimulus. In all cultures, the medium was replaced every 3–4 days for a period of 21 days. Cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 10% formalin for 10 minutes, and stained for 15 minutes with fresh oil red O solution (Sigma-Aldrich).

Histological Analyses of Engineered Cartilage
Cartilage engineered from stem cells was frozen in O.C.T. embedding matrix (BDH; VWR International Ltd., Leicestershire, UK, http://uk.vwr.com). Full-depth sections (thickness, 7 µm) were cut with a cryostat and fixed in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS, pH 7.6. Some sections were stained with H&E or 0.1% (wt/vol) Safranin O (both from Sigma-Aldrich) to evaluate matrix and proteoglycan distribution, respectively. Other sections were immunostained with monoclonal antibodies against collagen type II (Southern Biotechnology). Biotinylated secondary antibodies were detected with a peroxidase-labeled biotin-streptavidin complex (Vectastain Elite kit; Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, U.K., http://www.vectorlabs.com) with diaminobenzidine substrate (Vector Laboratories).

Quantitative Biochemical Analyses of Engineered Cartilage
Dry weights of the constructs were determined after freeze-drying. The samples were then solubilized with trypsin and processed for biochemical analysis of type I collagen and type II collagen as recently described [21]. The extracts were assayed by inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a mouse IgG monoclonal antibody to denatured type II collagen, COL2–3/4m, as previously described [10]. The extracts were also assayed by inhibition ELISA using a rabbit antipeptide antibody to type I collagen, as previously described [21].

Short Interfering RNA Knockdown Analysis
Short interfering RNA (siRNA) (50 pmol) was introduced into cells by complexing with Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen). The transfected cultures were incubated with TGF-β3 (10 ng/ml) or LE135 (1 µM) for 72 hours, and then cells were harvested for mRNA analysis using real-time RT-PCR analysis. Transfection efficiency and cell viability were optimized using BLOCK-iT Fluorescent Oligos (Invitrogen). The resultant transfection efficiency and cell viability were both >90%. Stealth Select RNAi sequence (Invitrogen) specific for human SOX9 was used in the experiments. The sequence was as follows: UGAGCUGUGUGUAGACGGGUUGUUC; Stealth RNAi Med GC sequence was used as negative control.

Statistical Analysis
Comparison of differences in nuclear receptor expression between paired samples was by the two-tailed paired t test. Analyses between individual groups was by the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple comparisons of LE135 doses were by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance followed by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test with a Dunn post hoc correction. In all tests, p < .05 was taken as significant.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Phenotype of Isolated BMSCs
A well-characterized population of stem cells was used to determine nuclear receptor expression in BMSCs. We have previously described this population as being positive for CD105, CD49a, CD117, BMPR-1A, STRO-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1A) and negative for CD34 [1, 22]. We also showed the population to be multipotential, as it consistently differentiated into adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineages [22]. In the present study, there was no significant variation in the extent of differentiation among the patient samples (n = 5), between male and female patients, or with age (not shown), indicating again that the BMSC population used was consistently multipotent.

Expression Profile of Nuclear Receptors
Undifferentiated adherent cells from passage 2 or 3 were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to assess the expression profile of PPARs, RARs, and RXRs. For each of five different patients, the undifferentiated cells expressed all of the nuclear receptor proteins that were analyzed (Table 1). However, there was clear heterogeneity in the level of expression, ranging from less than 1% of BMSCs positive for RAR{gamma} to more than 80% positive for RXRβ.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of nuclear receptors in undifferentiated bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

 
Changes in Nuclear Receptor Expression After Chondrogenic Differentiation
TGF-β was used to initiate BMSC chondrogenesis in three-dimensional (3D) tissue engineering cultures. For four different patients, mRNA was isolated from the undifferentiated BMSCs and from the same cells after differentiation. The mRNA was analyzed by real-time PCR for expression of RARs (Fig. 1A), RXRs (Fig. 1B), and PPARs (Fig. 1C). There were statistically significant increases in mRNA expression for RAR{alpha}, RAR{gamma}, PPAR{alpha}, and PPAR{delta} as a result of chondrogenesis. There were also apparent increases in all three RXRs, as well as PPARβ; however, for these genes, the effect was more variable and did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, mRNA for RARβ fell by 75% as a result of chondrogenesis, and this downregulation was statistically significant (Fig. 1A).


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Changes in nuclear receptor mRNA after differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) to chondrocytes. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to quantify each nuclear receptor mRNA relative to the β-actin housekeeping gene in undifferentiated BMSCs and in the same cells after transforming growth factor-β-driven chondrogenesis on polyglycolic acid scaffolds. (A): Results for RAR subtypes. (B): Results for RXR subtypes. (C): Results for PPAR subtypes. All results are shown as the mean ± SEM for n = 4 patients. **, p < .02; ***, p < .01 by two-tailed paired t test. Abbreviations: NS, not significant; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; RAR, retinoic acid receptor.

 
Regulation of Chondrogenesis by the RARβ Receptor
In light of the downregulation of the RARβ receptor observed during TGF-β-induced chondrogenesis, we went on to explore whether downregulation of this receptor using a selective antagonist could lead to chondrogenesis. The commercially available retinoid receptor antagonist LE135 selectively blocks both RAR{alpha} and RARβ but no other retinoid receptors, and it is approximately sixfold more selective for the β over the {alpha} receptor. In initial experiments, it was used in BMSC monolayer cultures at a concentration of 1 µM in the absence of serum and growth factors. After 3 days of culture with TGF-β3, there was a small increase in chondrogenic markers SOX9 (Fig. 2A), aggrecan (Fig. 2B), and type II collagen (Fig. 2C), as well as the hypertrophic marker type X collagen (Fig. 2D). The equivalent 3-day culture results for LE135 were not significantly different from that of TGF-β3 for any of the markers, although there was a trend toward lower type X collagen synthesis (Fig. 2). After 6 days of culture with TGF-β3, there was a sustained increase in SOX9, aggrecan, and type II collagen and a large increase in type X collagen synthesis to almost 150-fold over the negative control (Fig. 2). At 6 days, there was still no significant difference between LE135 and TGF-β3 with respect to aggrecan and type II collagen synthesis (Fig. 2B, 2C). However, there was significantly less SOX9 (Fig. 2A) and complete suppression of type X collagen (Fig. 2D). These observations indicate that LE135 can induce BMSCs to differentiate to chondrocytes without subsequent hypertrophy and that upregulation of SOX9 may not be required for this effect.


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Quantitative mRNA analysis of LE135-induced chondrogenesis. Expanded bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in monolayer were incubated with 10 ng/ml transforming growth factor-β3 (black columns) or 1 µM LE135 (white columns) for 3 or 6 days as indicated. Total RNA was harvested at each time point and analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR for mRNA of SOX9 (A), aggrecan (B), type II collagen (C), and type X collagen (D), as described in Materials and Methods. mRNA expression is shown as the relative increase over unstimulated BMSC controls. Results are the mean ± SEM (n = 5). **, p < .01 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. Abbreviation: NS, not significant.

 
Cartilage Tissue Engineering Using RARβ Antagonist LE135
Having demonstrated the potential for LE135 to induce chondrogenesis in monolayer BMSC cultures, we considered it important to determine whether this pharmacological agent could support 3D cartilage formation. As a positive control, we engineered cartilage from BMSCs grown on PGA scaffolds using TGF-β3 to drive chondrogenesis, as previously reported [1]. In the present study, this resulted in the generation of a white, shiny tissue that resembled hyaline cartilage and that was distinct from the residual scaffold that remained in negative control cultures (Fig. 3A, top panels). When we cultured BMSCs on PGA scaffolds with 1 µM LE135 instead of TGF-β3, we were able to generate a tissue that resembled hyaline cartilage at a macroscopic level (Fig. 3A, bottom right panel), although this engineered tissue was smaller in diameter and thickness than that generated using TGF-β3. At the lower dose of 0.1 µM LE135, there was negligible extracellular matrix formation (Fig. 3A, bottom left panel), whereas at higher doses, this inhibitor was toxic to the BMSCs (not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Chondrogenic lineage specificity of LE135. Expanded bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from passage 2 or 3 were cultured under chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic conditions as described in Materials and Methods. (A): Chondrogenesis was induced by 10 ng/ml transforming growth factor-β3 (+ve control) or by 0.1 and 1 µM LE135. The negative control (–ve control) was incubated without chondrogenic stimulus. Results are shown as macroscopic appearance at the end of tissue culture. More detailed analysis is shown in Figures 4 and 5. (B): Osteogenesis was induced by β-glycerophosphate (+ve control) or by 0.1 and 1 µM LE135. The negative control (–ve control) was incubated without osteogenic stimulus. Bone formation was determined by staining for calcium with alizarin red at the end of culture. Positive staining could be seen throughout the +ve control cultures but not in the LE135 cultures. (C): Adipogenesis was induced by β-hydrocortisone, isobutylmethylxanthine, and indomethacin (+ve control) or by 0.1 and 1 µM LE135. The negative control (–ve control) was incubated without adipogenic stimulus. Adipose formation was determined by staining for lipids with oil red O at the end of culture. Positive staining could be seen in patches in the +ve control culture but not in the LE135 cultures. All results are typical examples for n = 4 patients. Abbreviations: -ve control, negative control; +ve control, positive control.

 
Lineage Specificity of LE135
As BMSCs are multipotent cells with the capacity to form bone, fat, and cartilage, we investigated whether LE135 is capable of driving differentiation along these pathways as well. In positive control cultures, we were able to induce osteogenesis using β-glycerophosphate as the stimulus (Fig. 3B, top right panel) and adipogenesis using a cocktail of β-hydrocortisone, isobutylmethylxanthine, and indomethacin (Fig. 3C, top right panel). However, there was no osteogenesis or adipogenesis in cultures with 0.1 or 1 µM LE135 (Fig. 3B, 3C, bottom panels) or in negative control cultures (Fig. 3B, 3C, top left panels).

Histological Analysis of Chondrogenesis in LE135 and TGF-β Cultures
The macroscopic observations of chondrogenesis shown in Figure 3A led us to undertake a more detailed investigation of the extent to which LE135 induces chondrogenesis, in comparison with TGF-β. Figure 4 shows the results of histological staining after BMSCs were used to engineer cartilage in cultures driven by LE135 or TGF-β3. With both stimuli, there was an extensive extracellular matrix containing rounded cells within lacunae (Fig. 4A, 4B). However, the extracellular matrix was clearly more abundant with TGF-β. With both stimuli, there was positive staining with Safranin O for proteoglycans, although again this was more extensive in TGF-β cultures (Fig. 4C, 4D). There was also clear evidence of an extensive type II collagen fibrillar network with both LE135 and TGF-β (Fig. 4E, 4F, compared with negative controls in Fig. 4G, 4H).


Figure 4
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Histological analysis of engineered cartilage. Expanded bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from passage 2 or 3 were used to engineer cartilage on PGA scaffolds, as described under Materials and Methods. (A, C, E, F): Chondrogenesis was induced using 1 µM LE135. (B, D, G, H): Chondrogenesis was induced using 10 ng/ml transforming growth factor-β3 as the positive control. (A, B): Sections were stained with H&E. (C, D): Proteoglycans were stained with Safranin O. (E, F): Immunostaining for type II collagen. (G, H): Immunostaining controls (no primary antibody). Final magnification, x40 in all panels. Arrows indicate examples of areas where unresorbed PGA scaffold was still present in the extracellular matrix.

 
Biochemical Analysis of Chondrogenesis in LE135 and TGF-β Cultures
We undertook quantitative biochemical analysis of the specific collagens in our engineered tissues using validated and specific assays for collagen types I and II [21, 23]. In positive control cultures using TGF-β3 to drive chondrogenesis, the type II collagen content reached approximately 15% of the dry weight of the tissue (Fig. 5A), whereas less than 0.5% of the dry weight was type I collagen (Fig. 5B). With LE135, there was a dose-dependent increase in the type II collagen content that was significant at 1 µM, reaching two-thirds of that observed in TGF-β cultures (Fig. 5A). As with TGF-β, there was negligible type I collagen in LE135 cultures (Fig. 5B). Combined with the histological analysis in Figure 4, these observations indicate that 1 µM LE135 not only induces chondrogenesis but can support 3D cartilage formation in our tissue engineering protocol, although not as effectively as TGF-β.


Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Quantitative analysis of LE135-induced cartilage tissue engineering. Expanded bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from passage 2 or 3 were used to engineer cartilage on PGA scaffolds, as described in Materials and Methods. The constructs were maintained in 10 ng/ml TGF-β3 (black column; positive control) or 0.1–1.0 µM LE135 (striped columns) throughout the culture period. Controls were cultured without any stimulus (white columns). (A): Results for type II collagen. (B): Results for type I collagen. Results shown are the mean ± SEM (n = 5). *, p < .05 by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance followed by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test with a Dunn post hoc correction for multiple comparisons. Abbreviations: NS, not significant; TGF, transforming growth factor.

 
Effect of SOX9 Gene Knockdown
To further test the theory that SOX9 signaling is not essential for LE135-induced chondrogenesis, we knocked down the SOX9 gene in BMSCs using specific siRNA and then cultured these cells with TGF-β3 or LE135. In TGF-β3 cultures, SOX9 knockdown resulted in a significant inhibition of SOX9 mRNA expression, as well as significant inhibition of aggrecan and type II collagen mRNA (Fig. 6A), indicating that TGF-β3-driven chondrogenesis is dependent on SOX9 activation. However, in LE135 cultures, there was no significant inhibition of aggrecan or type II collagen mRNA expression, even though SOX9 mRNA was successfully knocked down (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, the very large increase in type X collagen mRNA induced by TGF-β3 was significantly inhibited by SOX9 knockdown; with LE135, there was minimal type X collagen mRNA expression with or without SOX9 knockdown (Fig. 6C). These observations suggest that LE135-induced upregulation of type II collagen and aggrecan mRNA is independent of SOX9 and further indicate that hypertrophy is dependent on SOX9 expression.


Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Effect of SOX9 short interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown on chondrogenesis induced by TGF-β3 and LE135. SOX9-specific siRNA (white columns) or its scrambled sequence (gray columns; negative control) were introduced into bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in a monolayer that was then incubated with 10 ng/ml TGF-β3 or 1.0 µM LE135. After 72 hours, total RNA was extracted from cells for quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction mRNA analysis. mRNA expression is shown as the relative increase over unstimulated BMSC controls. The effects of SOX9 knockdown on SOX9, aggrecan, and type II collagen mRNA expressions are shown for TGF-β3-driven chondrogenesis in (A) and for LE135-driven chondrogenesis in (B). (C): Effects of SOX9 knockdown on type X collagen mRNA expression in TGF-β3- and LE135-driven cultures, as indicated. Results are the mean ± SEM from five experiments. *, p < .05 by Mann-Whitney U test. Abbreviations: NS, not significant; TGF, transforming growth factor.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We have demonstrated for the first time that a small, synthetic inhibitor of RAR{alpha} and RARβ can induce BMSCs in a simple tissue engineering procedure to become chondrocyte-like cells that are capable of generating a 3D matrix containing detectable levels of type II collagen and proteoglycan but little type I collagen. Furthermore, this pharmacologically induced chondrogenic pathway is different from that induced by TGF-β in that it is not dependent on SOX9 upregulation and does not lead to upregulation of type X collagen, a marker of hypertrophy. These results demonstrate the feasibility of a pharmacological approach to the regulation of stem cell function both in vitro and, potentially, in vivo.

Although our results clearly show upregulation of type II collagen by LE135, the induction of aggrecan was clearly less efficient than with TGF-β (compare Fig. 4C with Fig. 4D). This suggests that the inhibitor induces only incomplete chondrogenesis, which may explain why there was no hypertrophy in these cultures. It remains to be established whether the partially formed cartilage has the capacity to mature further either in vitro or when implanted into an articulating joint.

This study has used a well-characterized stem cell population derived from osteoarthritis patients by standard techniques for growing and maintaining bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells [1, 22]. We have for the first time surveyed the expression of common nuclear receptors in this undifferentiated stem cell population and found that all variants of PPARs, RARs, and RXRs were present. As we aimed to identify differential expression of nuclear receptor before and after chondrogenic stimulation, this group of nuclear receptor was selected based on their potential involvement in mouse limb bud mesenchyme differentiation into chondrocytes [19, 24]. The expression varied among those nuclear receptors studied from being almost absent (RAR{gamma}) to being highly expressed (RXRβ), suggesting that there may be subtypes of BMSCs represented by the differences in nuclear receptor expression. It remains to be investigated whether the ubiquitous expression of these nuclear receptors plays a role in the maintenance of the undifferentiated phenotype of BMSCs and whether loss of each one might be associated with a specific differentiation pathway.

Our analysis revealed that only RARβ is downregulated upon TGF-β3-driven chondrogenic differentiation of human BMSCs. This suggested a possible interaction of RARs and the TGF-β signaling pathway in driving chondrogenesis. TGF-β was recently shown to upregulate chondrogenic markers of differentiating human BMSCs through a Smad2/3 signaling pathway [25]. Interestingly, Smad-driven transcription can be potentiated using RAR antagonists [26], implying that the absence of RARβ could be vital for the chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells. We have tested this hypothesis by incubating BMSCs in monolayer with the commercially available RARβ antagonist LE135 and analyzing its chondrogenic potential. LE135 displays moderate selectivity for RARβ over RAR{alpha} (Ki values are 0.22 and 1.4 mM, respectively), and it is highly selective for RARβ over RAR{gamma} and RXR{alpha} [27]. The upregulation of chondrogenic markers demonstrated in the presence of LE135 was clear, although not as extensive as in the positive controls using TGF-β3. This novel finding in human BMSCs supports and builds on the work of others who have shown that RAR antagonists can drive the chondrogenic differentiation of mouse limb bud mesenchyme [2830]. Retinoid signaling is thought to play a major role in early skeletal development. The importance of this pathway is highlighted by the fact that skeletal malformations induced by retinoic acid are most severe when it is applied during the period of cartilage development. Numerous studies have subsequently demonstrated, more directly, an inhibition of cartilage differentiation by retinoic acid [24]. More recently, the focus has shifted toward uncovering the role of RARs during skeletogenesis. During the early development and outgrowth of mouse limbs, RARs are expressed throughout the limb mesenchyme. However, as mesenchymal cells condense and differentiate, RARs are downregulated and become largely restricted to the surrounding perichondrium and interdigital region. Conversely, the overexpression of RARs, particularly RAR{alpha}, or the presence of ligand-activated RARs results in skeletal malformation [28, 29].

Previous studies [6, 31] have shown that the TGF-βs promote the formation of hypertrophic chondrocytes in differentiating BMSCs, as shown by upregulation of type X collagen mRNA. The presence of type X collagen and hypertrophic chondrocytes leads ultimately to cartilage calcification [32], a phenomenon that may hinder the use of TGF-β to derive chondrogenic stem cells for therapeutic delivery. Strikingly, LE135 did not upregulate type X collagen in our chondrogenic cultures, suggesting that it is acting through a signaling pathway divergent from or completely different from the TGF-β pathway [29]. A recent report demonstrated that retinoic acid agonists stimulate type X collagen transcription directly in prehypertrophic chondrocytes through the activation of RARs [33]. Furthermore, stimulation of type X collagen gene expression by retinoids was found to occur in part through the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway [34]. BMPs are part of the TGF superfamily and are known to drive chondrogenic differentiation of adult human stem cells. Taken together with our findings, this suggests that RAR antagonists may act by preventing the binding of active RARs to the retinoic acid response element implicated in stimulating type X collagen expression. This theory requires further investigation.

Our results suggest that LE135-driven chondrogenic differentiation is not dependent on SOX9 upregulation. This contradicts an earlier finding with mouse primary limb mesenchymal cultures, where inhibition of RAR signaling with RAR-selective antagonists induced SOX9 expression and activity [30]. There may be a number of explanations for this discrepancy; our findings are based on using human rather than rodent mesenchymal cells. For example, first, RAR agonists were found to upregulate SOX9 in human breast cancer cell lines [35]; second, the limb bud mesenchyme chondrogenic response to RAR modulation appears to be restricted to cells committed to the chondrocytic lineage, as SOX9 activity is unaffected in an early undifferentiated cell line [30]; and finally, other SOX molecules, such as SOX5 and SOX6, may compensate for the lack of SOX9 in driving the chondrogenic differentiation in this system [7, 8]. On the other hand, SOX9-specific siRNA downregulates the chondrogenic markers in TGF-β3-driven differentiation (Fig. 6). This may not be surprising, given that the BMP pathway, for example, appears to function either upstream of or in a separate pathway from the retinoid signaling pathway within the chondrogenic program of limb bud mesenchyme [29].

Our demonstration that RARβ plays a role in the chondrogenic differentiation of adult BMSCs has several important implications. First, we have been able to engineer cartilage that approaches the quality of that achieved with the widely used standard TGF-β3. This is the first example of pharmacological control of stem cell chondrogenesis and highlights the need for an extensive screen of other families of small synthetic molecules both for cartilage formation and to regulate other differentiation pathways. Second, we have shown that the RARβ chondrogenic pathway is independent of upregulation in SOX9 and does not lead to hypertrophy. This would seem to suggest that SOX9 is essential for the formation of hypertrophic chondrocytes but not those found at sites outside of the growth plate, although this conclusion requires further analysis of cartilage matrix protein formation after knockdown of the SOX9 gene. Third, our observations suggest that systemic administration of pharmacological agents could be used to treat patients by targeting either their endogenous or donated stem cells.

In conclusion, targeting nuclear receptors pharmacologically for the purpose of modulating stem cells functions is a promising area in regenerative medicine. By identifying the role of specific nuclear receptors in these cells and developing corresponding specific ligands as modulators, the therapeutic delivery of stem cells will become more controlled and efficient.


    DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This work was funded by a grant from the U.K. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. A.P.H. is funded in part by an endowed chair from the U.K. Arthritis Research Campaign. W.K. and S.M. contributed equally to this work.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Kafienah W, Mistry S, Dickinson S et al. Three-dimensional cartilage tissue engineering using adult stem cells from osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:177–187.[CrossRef][Medline]

  2. Raghunath J, Salacinski HJ, Sales KM et al. Advancing cartilage tissue engineering: The application of stem cell technology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005;16:503–509.[CrossRef][Medline]

  3. Vats A, Bielby RC, Tolley NS et al. Stem cells. Lancet 2005;366:592–602.[CrossRef][Medline]

  4. Martin I, Shastri VP, Padera RF et al. Selective differentiation of mammalian bone marrow stromal cells cultured on three-dimensional polymer foams. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:229–235.[CrossRef][Medline]

  5. Yoo JU, Barthel TS, Nishimura K et al. The chondrogenic potential of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1745–1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Johnstone B, Hering TM, Caplan AI et al. In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res 1998;238:265–272.[CrossRef][Medline]

  7. Lefebvre V, Smits P. Transcriptional control of chondrocyte fate and differentiation. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2005;75:200–212.[CrossRef][Medline]

  8. Lefebvre V, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. L-Sox5, Sox6 and Sox9 control essential steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9 (suppl A):S69–S75.[Medline]

  9. Poole AR. Cartilage in health and disease. In: Koopman WJ, ed. Arthritis and Allied Conditions: A Textbook of Rheumatology.Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins,1997;255–308.

  10. Hollander AP, Heathfield TF, Webber C et al. Increased damage to type II collagen in osteoarthritic articular cartilage detected by a new immunoassay. J Clin Invest 1994;93:1722–1732.[Medline]

  11. Hollander AP, Pidoux I, Reiner A et al. Damage to type II collagen in aging and osteoarthritis starts at the articular surface, originates around chondrocytes, and extends into the cartilage with progressive degeneration. J Clin Invest 1995;96:2859–2869.[Medline]

  12. Caterson B, Flannery CR, Hughes CE et al. Mechanisms of proteoglycan metabolism that lead to cartilage destruction in the pathogenesis of arthritis. Drugs Today (Barc) 1999;35:397–402.[Medline]

  13. Hunziker EB. Articular cartilage repair: Are the intrinsic biological constraints undermining this process insuperable? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999;7:15–28.[CrossRef][Medline]

  14. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ. Microfracture: Surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop 2001; (suppl)S362–S369.

  15. Cawston TE. Blocking cartilage destruction with metalloproteinase inhibitors: A valid therapeutic target? Ann Rheum Dis 1993;52:769–770.[Free Full Text]

  16. Greenwald RA. Thirty-six years in the clinic without an MMP inhibitor. What hath collagenase wrought? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999;878:413–419.[CrossRef][Medline]

  17. Close DR. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60 (suppl 3):iii62–iii67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Vats A, Bielby RC, Tolley N et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells: The effect of the micro-environment. Tissue Eng 2006;12:1687–1697.[CrossRef][Medline]

  19. Gronemeyer H, Gustafsson JA, Laudet V. Principles for modulation of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004;3:950–964.[CrossRef][Medline]

  20. Bruder SP, Jaiswal N, Haynesworth SE. Growth kinetics, self-renewal, and the osteogenic potential of purified human mesenchymal stem cells during extensive subcultivation and following cryopreservation. J Cell Biochem 1997;64:278–294.[CrossRef][Medline]

  21. Dickinson SC, Sims TJ, Pittarello L et al. Quantitative outcome measures of cartilage repair in patients treated by tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2005;11:277–287.[CrossRef][Medline]

  22. Kafienah W, Mistry S, Williams C et al. Nucleostemin is a marker of proliferating stromal stem cells in adult human bone marrow. STEM CELLS 2006;24:1113–1120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Hollander AP, Dickinson SC, Sims TJ et al. Maturation of engineered cartilage implanted in injured and osteoarthritic human knees. Tissue Eng 2006;12:1787–1798.[CrossRef][Medline]

  24. Hoffman LM, Weston AD, Underhill TM. Molecular mechanisms regulating chondroblast differentiation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A (suppl 2):124–132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Furumatsu T, Tsuda M, Taniguchi N et al. Smad3 induces chondrogenesis through the activation of SOX9 via CREB-binding protein/p300 recruitment. J Biol Chem 2005;280:8343–8350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Pendaries V, Verrecchia F, Michel S et al. Retinoic acid receptors interfere with the TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway in a ligand-specific manner. Oncogene 2003;22:8212–8220.[CrossRef][Medline]

  27. Li Y, Hashimoto Y, Agadir A et al. Identification of a novel class of retinoic acid receptor beta-selective retinoid antagonists and their inhibitory effects on AP-1 activity and retinoic acid-induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 1999;274:15360–15366.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Cash DE, Bock CB, Schughart K et al. Retinoic acid receptor alpha function in vertebrate limb skeletogenesis: A modulator of chondrogenesis. J Cell Biol 1997;136:445–457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Weston AD, Rosen V, Chandraratna RA et al. Regulation of skeletal progenitor differentiation by the BMP and retinoid signaling pathways. J Cell Biol 2000;148:679–690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Weston AD, Chandraratna RA, Torchia J et al. Requirement for RAR-mediated gene repression in skeletal progenitor differentiation. J Cell Biol 2002;158:39–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  31. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143–147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Kronenberg HM. Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 2003;423:332–336.[CrossRef][Medline]

  33. Cohen AJ, Lassova L, Golden EB et al. Retinoids directly activate the collagen X promoter in prehypertrophic chondrocytes through a distal retinoic acid response element. J Cell Biochem 2006;99:269–278.[CrossRef][Medline]

  34. Adams SL, Pallante KM, Niu Z et al. Stimulation of type-X collagen gene transcription by retinoids occurs in part through the BMP signaling pathway. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:29–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  35. Afonja O, Raaka BM, Huang A et al. RAR agonists stimulate SOX9 gene expression in breast cancer cell lines: Evidence for a role in retinoid-mediated growth inhibition. Oncogene 2002;21:7850–7860.[CrossRef][Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2007-0059v1
25/10/2460    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kafienah, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hollander, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kafienah, W.
Right arrow Articles by Hollander, A. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS