Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online October 18, 2007
Stem Cells Vol. 26 No. 1 January 2008, pp. 64 -71
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0532; www.StemCells.com
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2007-0532v1
26/1/64    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharifpanah, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharifpanah, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, H.

EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Agonists Enhance Cardiomyogenesis of Mouse ES Cells by Utilization of a Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Mechanism

Fatemeh Sharifpanaha, Maria Wartenbergb, Madeleine Hannigb, Hans-Michael Pipera, Heinrich Sauera

aDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany;
bDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology Division, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany

Key Words. Embryonic stem cells • Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor • heart • Cardiomyogenesis • Reactive oxygen species

Correspondence: Correspondence: Heinrich Sauer, M.D., Department of Physiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Aulweg 129, 35392 Giessen, Germany. Telephone: +49-641-9947333; Fax: +49-641-9947219; e-mail: heinrich.sauer{at}physiologie.med.uni-giessen.de

Received on July 6, 2007; accepted for publication on October 9, 2007.

First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS  October 18, 2007.

    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR{alpha}, -β and -{gamma}) are nuclear receptors involved in transcriptional regulation of lipid and energy metabolism. Since the energy demand increases when cardiac progenitor cells are developing rhythmic contractile activity, PPAR activation may play a critical role during cardiomyogenesis of embryonic stem (ES) cells. It is shown that ES cells express PPAR{alpha}, -β, and -{gamma} mRNA during differentiation of ES cells towards cardiac cells. Treatment with PPAR{alpha} agonists (WY14643, GW7647, and ciprofibrate) significantly increased cardiomyogenesis and expression of the cardiac genes MLC2a, ANP, MHC-β, MLC2v, and cardiac {alpha}-actin. Furthermore, WY14643 increased PPAR{alpha} gene expression and the expression of the cardiogenic transcription factors GATA-4, Nkx2.5, DTEF-1, and MEF 2C. In contrast, the PPAR{alpha} antagonist MK886 decreased cardiomyogenesis, whereas the PPARβ agonist L-165,041 as well as the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW1929 were without effects. Treatment with PPAR{alpha}, but not PPARβ, and PPAR{gamma} agonists and MK886, resulted in generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which was inhibited in the presence of the NADPH oxidase inhibitors diphenylen iodonium (DPI) and apocynin and the free radical scavengers vitamin E and N-(2-mercapto-propionyl)-glycine (NMPG), whereas the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone was without effects. The effect of PPAR{alpha} agonists on cardiomyogenesis of ES cells was abolished upon preincubation with free radical scavengers and NADPH oxidase inhibitors, indicating involvement of ROS in PPAR{alpha}, mediated cardiac differentiation. In summary, our data indicate that stimulation of PPAR{alpha} but not PPARβ and -{gamma} enhances cardiomyogenesis in ES cells using a pathway that involves ROS and NADPH oxidase activity.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), are ligand-activated transcription factors belonging to the nuclear receptor family. PPARs function as regulators of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and glucose homeostasis, and influence cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [1]. PPAR{alpha} is highly expressed in tissues such as liver, muscle, kidney, and heart, where it stimulates the β-oxidative degradation of fatty acids. PPAR{gamma} is predominantly expressed in intestine and adipose tissue where it triggers adipocyte differentiation and promotes lipid storage. PPARβ/{delta} is ubiquitously expressed and activators exert anti-inflammatory and antihypertrophic effects in cardiomyocytes. The hypolipidemic fibrates and the antidiabetic glitazones are synthetic ligands for PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma}, respectively. Furthermore, fatty acids and eicosanoids are natural PPAR ligands: PPAR{alpha} is activated by leukotriene B4, whereas prostaglandin J2 is a PPAR{gamma} ligand [2]. The synthetic PPAR ligands, besides their role as hypolipidemic and insulin-sensitizing agents, have been previously shown to exert beneficial effects in inhibiting the pathogenesis of heart failure, atherosclerosis, and hypertension although the underlying signaling cascades are not yet unraveled [2, 3]. In the course of cardiac hypertrophy, which is an adaptive response of the heart, during which terminally differentiated cardiomyocytes increase in size without undergoing cell division, PPAR{alpha} expression is downregulated with the consequence of reduced fatty acid oxidation and increased glycolysis [4]. In patients with hypertensive heart disease, the expression of native PPAR{alpha} protein was decreased and truncated PPAR{alpha} protein was overexpressed [5]. Chronic reduction in fatty acid oxidation due to downregulation of PPAR{alpha} leads to cardiac lipotoxicity and subsequent apoptosis. Furthermore, chronic downregulation of PPAR{alpha} during cardiac hypertrophy may further impair cardiac function due to insufficient production of ATP, thereby leading to cardiac failure [6]. Animals with genetic inactivation of PPAR{alpha} are viable and fertile and exhibit no detectable gross phenotypic defects [7]. However, short-term starvation caused hepatic steatosis, myocardial lipid accumulation, and hypoglycemia, with an inadequate ketogenic response in adult mice lacking PPAR{alpha} [8]. PPAR{alpha} is upregulated in the heart during embryogenesis which is presumably due to an increased energy demand arising from the increasing cardiac workload in the growing embryo [6]. Interestingly, PPAR{alpha} expression during embryogenesis is transient, suggesting that a period of PPAR{alpha} expression during embryonic heart development may be required for normal heart function [6].

Recently, it was shown that the PPAR{alpha} agonist WY14643 stimulated cardiac differentiation from mouse ES cells [9] by a so far unknown signaling pathway. In the latter study it was suggested that PPAR{alpha} activity is required during differentiation of stem cells towards cardiac cells with the emergence of contractile activity and concomitant increased ATP consumption. In the present study, we demonstrate that PPAR{alpha} activation but not PPARβ and -{gamma} are required for the stimulation of cardiac cell differentiation. It is furthermore demonstrated that PPAR{alpha} stimulation results in activation of NADPH oxidase and subsequent ROS generation, which is, as previous studies from our group have suggested [1013], a prerequisite for cardiovascular differentiation of ES cells.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Spinner-Culture Technique for Cultivation of Embryoid Bodies
To obtain embryoid bodies, ES cells (line CCE) were grown on mitotically inactivated feeder layers of primary murine embryonic fibroblasts in Iscove's medium (Gibco, Live Technologies, Helgerman Court, MD, USA) supplemented with 15% heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 minutes) fetal calf serum (FCS) (Sigma), 2 mM glutamine, (PAA, Cölbe, Germany), 100 µM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), 1% (v/v) NEA non-essential amino acids stock solution (100x) (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), 0.8% (v/v) MEM amino acids (50x) (Biochrom), 1 mM Na+-pyruvate (Biochrom), 0.25% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (200x) (Biochrom) and 1,000 U/ml LIF (Chemicon, Hampshire, U.K.) in a humidified environment containing 5% CO2 at 37°C, and passaged every 2–3 days. At day 0 of differentiation, adherent cells were enzymatically dissociated using 0.05% trypsin-EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Gibco), and seeded at a density of 3 · 106 cells ml in 250 ml siliconized spinner flasks (Integra Biosciences, Fernwald, Germany) containing 100 ml Iscove's medium supplemented with the same additives as described above. Following 24 hours, 150 ml medium was added to give a final volume of 250 ml. The spinner flask medium was stirred at 20 rpm using a stirrer system (Integra Biosciences), and 150 ml cell culture medium was exchanged every day.

Measurement of ROS Generation
Intracellular ROS levels were measured using the fluorescent dye 2'7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), which is a nonpolar compound that is converted into a nonfluorescent polar derivative (H2DCF) by cellular esterases after incorporation into cells. H2DCF is membrane impermeable and is rapidly oxidized to the highly fluorescent 2'7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) in the presence of intracellular ROS. For the experiments, embryoid bodies were incubated in serum-free medium, and 20 µM H2DCF-DA dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added. After 30 minutes, intracellular DCF fluorescence (corrected for background fluorescence) was evaluated in 3,600 µm2 regions of interest using an overlay mask unless otherwise indicated. For fluorescence excitation, the 488 nm band of the argon ion laser of a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica SP2 AOBS, Leica, Bensheim, Germany) was used. Emission was recorded at an emission band of 515–550 nm.

Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed with whole mount embryoid bodies. As primary antibody, a monoclonal mouse anti {alpha}-actinin antibody (Sigma) was used. The respective tissues were fixed in icecold methanol for 20 minutes at –20°C, and washed 3 times with PBS containing 0.01% Triton X-100 (PBST) (Sigma). Blocking against unspecific binding was performed for 60 minutes with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) dissolved in 0.01% PBST. The tissues were subsequently incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature, with primary antibodies dissolved in PBS supplemented with 10% FCS in 0.01% PBST. The tissues were thereafter washed 3 times with PBST (0.01% Triton) and reincubated with a Cy5-conjugated goat anti mouse IgG (H+L) (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) at a concentration of 3.8 µg/ml in PBS containing 10% FCS in 0.01% PBST. After washing 3 times in PBST (0.01% Triton), the tissues were stored in PBS until inspection. Fluorescence recordings were performed by means of a confocal laser scanning setup (Leica TCS SP2). The confocal setup was equipped with a 5 mW helium/neon laser single excitation 633 nm (excitation of Cy5). Emission was recorded at >665 nm. The pinhole settings of the confocal setup were adjusted to give a full width half maximum (FWHM) of 10 µm. Fluorescence was recorded in a depth of 80–120 µm in the depth of the tissue, and the fluorescence values in the respective optical sections were evaluated by the image analysis software of the confocal setup.

Analysis of the Size of Cardiac Cell Areas
Embryoid bodies plated on day 4 of cell culture to Petriperm Petri dishes (InVitro Systems Inc. Göttingen, Germany) were fixed on day 10 of cell culture, and stained with an antibody against {alpha}-actinin. Immunofluorescence of {alpha}-actinin-positive cell areas was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. By means of the "area measure" option of the image analysis software of the confocal setup, the size of the {alpha}-actinin-positive cell areas was measured after correction for background fluorescence. Mean values of all {alpha}-actinin-positive areas of cardiac cells which remained either untreated or were treated as indicated, were collected from 60 embryoid bodies in individual experiments from at least 3 different cell cultures.

Real Time RT PCR
Total RNA from CCE embryoid bodies treated for 24 hours with the substances as indicated, was prepared using Trizol (Invitrogen) method followed by genomic DNA digestion using DNAse I (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Total RNA concentration was determined by OD260 nm method. cDNA synthesis was performed using 2 µg RNA with MMLV RT (Invitrogen). Primer concentration for qPCR was 10 pM. Primer (Invitrogen) sequences were as follows:

PPAR{alpha} fwd: 5'-GTG GCT GCT ATA ATT TGC TGT G-3'

rev: 5'-GAA GGT GTC ATC TGG ATG GGT-3'

PPARβ fwd: 5'-TTG AGC CCA AGT TCG AGT TTG-3'

rev: 5'-CGG TCT CCA CAC AGA ATG ATG-3'

PPAR{gamma} fwd: 5'-AAT CAG CTC TGT GGA CCT CTC-3'

rev: 5'-CTC CAA GAA TAC CAA AGT GCG A-3'

cardiac fwd: 5'-CTC GAT TCT GGC GAT GGT GTA-3'

{alpha}-actin rev: 5'-CGG ACA ATT TCA CGT TCA GCA-3'

ANP fwd: 5'-CGT GCC CCG ACC CAC GCC AGC ATG GGC TCC-3'

rev: 5'-GGC TCC GAG GGC CAG CGA GCA GAG CCC TCA-3'

MLC2a fwd: 5'-TCA GCT GCA TTG ACC AGA AC-3'

rev: 5'-AAG ACG GTG AAG TTG ATG GG-3'

MLC2v fwd: 5'-AAA GAG GCT CCA GGT CCA AT-3'

rev: 5'-CCT CTC TGC TTG TGT GGT CA-3'

MHCβ fwd: 5'-CTA CAG GCC TGG GCT TAC CT-3'

rev: 5'-TCT CCT TCT CAG ACT TCC GC-3'

{alpha}-MHC fwd: 5'-TGAAAACGGAAAGACGGTGA-3'

rev: 5'-TCCTTGAGGTTGTACAGCACA-3'

DTEF-1 fwd: 5'-CCC GAA CGC TTT CTT CCT TGT C-3'

rev: 5'-ACC TTG GTG GAG ACG CTG ATG-3'

GATA-4 fwd: 5'-TCA AAC CAG AAA ACG GAA GC-3'

rev: 5'-GTG GCA TTG CTG GAG TTA CC-3'

MEF 2C fwd: 5'-GTG GCA TTG CTG GAG TTA CC-3'

rev: 5'-TAT TCC TCT GCA GAG ACG GG-3'

Nkx2.5 fwd: 5'-CCA CTC TCT GCT ACC CAC CT-3'

rev: 5'-CCA GGT TCA GGA TGT CTT TGA-3'

CD68 fwd: 5'- TAAAGAGGGCTTGGGGCATA-3'

rev: 5' – CTCGGGCTCTGATGTAGGTC-3'

GAPDH fwd: 5'-TCC ATG CCA TGA CTG CCA CTC-3'

rev: 5'-TGA CCT TGC CCA CAG CCT TG-3'

mPolr2a fwd: 5'- GACAAAACTGGCTCCTCTGC-3'

rev: 5'- GCTTGCCCTCTACATTCTGC-3'

Amplifications were performed in an Icycler Optical Module (Biorad, Munich, Germany) using iQTM SYBR Green Supermix (Biorad). Following programs were used:

Cycle 1: Step 1: 95°C for 3 minutes (1X)

Cycle 2: Step 1: 95°C for 30 seconds (45X)

Step 2: specific annealing temperatures for 30 seconds (45X)

Step 3: 72°C for 30 seconds (45X)

Cycle 3: Step 1: 50°C for 10 minutes

Annealing temperatures were:

58.5°C for PPAR{alpha}, 56°C for PPARβ, 57.5°C for PPAR{gamma}, 57°C for GAPDH

60°C for {alpha}-cardiac actin, ANP, MLC2a, MLC2v, MHCβ; 61°C for {alpha}-MHC, CD68, mPolr2a, and cardiac transcription factors. CT values were automatically obtained. Relative expression values were obtained by normalizing CT values of the tested genes in comparison with CT values of the housekeeping genes using the {Delta}{Delta} CT method.

Statistical Analysis
Data are given as mean values+ SD, with n denoting the number of experiments unless otherwise indicated. One-way ANOVA for unpaired data was applied as appropriate. A value of p < .05 was considered significant.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Expression of PPAR{alpha}, PPARβ, and PPAR{gamma} mRNA During the Differentiation of ES cells; Correlation with {alpha}-MHC and CD68 Expression
The expression of PPARs during rat embryonic development has been previously reported [6]. Investigation of the expression of PPARs during mouse ES cell differentiation should give clues on the development of fatty acid metabolism during differentiation, and capacities of adipogenesis and lipid storage. Furthermore, PPAR expression could be involved in differentiation processes of ES cells, for example, the differentiation of cardiac cells. Analysis of mRNA expression of PPAR{alpha}, -β and -{gamma} during the differentiation of ES cells, revealed that all PPAR species under investigation were expressed during differentiation, however with different time patterns (Fig. 1A–C, n = 4). Expression of PPAR{alpha} increased from day 6 of differentiation on and reached maximum expression at day 12 of cell culture. A second maximum of PPAR{alpha} expression was observed on day 20. PPARβ expression exerted a comparable time frame with maximum expression on day 12 and an elevated plateau of expression in late stages of differentiation. In contrast PPAR{gamma} expression displayed 2 maxima of expression at days 8 and 18, respectively.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Expression of PPAR{alpha}, PPARβ, and PPAR{gamma} mRNA during the differentiation of mouse ES cells. Data are presented as relative change to the mRNA expression on day 4 (set to 100%). Note that an increase in PPAR{alpha} expression occurs during the time frame of cardiomyogenesis which takes place during days 5–8. *, p < .05 significantly different to PPAR mRNA expression on day 4 of cell culture.

 
To correlate the expression of PPARs with cardiomyogenesis and expression of macrophage markers, real time RT PCR was performed for cardiac {alpha}-MHC and the macrophage marker CD68 (Fig. 2A, 2B, n = 3). Both {alpha}-MHC and CD68 mRNA displayed a transient increase during ES cell differentiation with maximum expression achieved on day 10 of cell culture. This expression pattern well coincided with mRNA expression of PPAR{alpha}, which showed maximum expression between days 10 and 12 of cell culture (see Fig. 1A).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Expression of the macrophage marker CD68 (A) and the cardiac marker {alpha}-MHC (B) during the differentiation of mouse ES cells. Data are presented as relative change in mRNA expression on day 2 (set to 100%). *, p < .05 significantly different to mRNA expression on day 2 of cell culture.

 
PPAR{alpha}, but not PPARβ or PPAR{gamma} Agonists, Stimulate Cardiomyogenesis of ES Cells
Stimulation of fatty acid metabolism by PPAR agonists, may enhance cardiomyogenesis of ES cells since contractile activity of differentiating cardiac cells may require additional ATP that is more efficiently provided by fatty acid metabolism and the respiratory chain as compared to glycolysis. To investigate whether PPAR agonists would stimulate cardiomyogenesis of ES cells, embryoid bodies grown from ES cells were treated from day 4 to day 10 with either the PPAR{alpha} agonists WY14643 (10 µM), GW7647 (10 µM), and ciprofibrate (10 µM), the PPARβ agonist L-165,041 (10 µM) or with the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW1929 (10 µM) (Fig. 3A, 3B). In parallel experiments, embryoid bodies were treated with the PPAR{alpha} antagonist MK886 (10 µM) (see Fig. 3A, 3B). Treatment with PPAR{alpha} agonists increased the number of spontaneously contracting embryoid bodies by approximately 50% whereas the PPARβ agonist L165,041 and the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW1929 were without effects (see Fig. 3A, n = 6). Furthermore, the PPAR{alpha} antagonist MK886 depressed cardiomyogenesis of ES cells, however, without reaching statistical significance. The effect of PPAR{alpha} agonists to increase the number of beating foci in ES cell-derived embryoid bodies was paralleled by formation of increased sizes of beating foci as evaluated by computer-assisted image analysis of {alpha}-actinin-positive cardiac cell areas (Fig. 3B, n = 3). Sizes of spontaneously contracting cardiac areas were significantly increased by PPAR{alpha} agonists, whereas PPARβ and {gamma} agonists were without effects, and a depression in the size of cardiac areas was observed with the PPAR{alpha} inhibitor MK886.


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effects of PPAR{alpha}, -β and {gamma} agonists on the development of spontaneously contracting foci of cardiomyocytes (A) and the extension of the contracting area (B). Differentiating embryoid bodies were treated from day 4 through day 10 of cell culture with either the PPAR{alpha} agonists WY14643, GW7647 and ciprofibrate, the PPARβ agonist L165,041 or the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW1929. In parallel cell cultures were treated with the PPAR{alpha} antagonist MK886. The number of spontaneously contracting foci was analyzed by microscopical inspection. The extension of the contracting area (B) was assessed by computer assisted image analysis of embryoid bodies after staining foci of cardiomyocytes with an antibody directed against {alpha}-actinin. Note, that only PPAR{alpha} agonists stimulated cardiomyogenesis of ES cells whereas PPARβ and-{gamma} agonists were without effects. The bar in the images represents 300 µm. *, p < .05, statistically significant as compared to the untreated control.

 
Activation of PPAR{alpha}-, Cardiac Gene-, and Cardiogenic Transcription Factor mRNA Expression through Stimulation of PPAR{alpha} Receptors by WY14643
Stimulation of cardiomyogenesis of ES cells by PPAR{alpha} agonists should be paralleled by an increase in cardiac gene expression. Furthermore activation of PPAR{alpha} receptors could induce a feed forward cycle of PPAR{alpha} gene expression thereby enhancing cardiomyogenesis. To investigate these issues, PPAR{alpha} mRNA expression was assessed in the absence and presence of WY14643 (10 µM) during the differentiation of ES cells (Fig. 4A, n = 3). It was apparent that presence of PPAR{alpha} agonist in the cell culture medium significantly increased PPAR{alpha} mRNA expression, the effect being considerably larger with longer incubation times. Treatment of embryoid bodies from day 4 to day 10 with WY14643 resulted in significantly increased expression levels of the cardiac genes ANP, MHC-β, MLC2v, MHC2a, and cardiac {alpha}-actin (Fig. 4B, n = 3), thus corroborating our observation of a stimulation of cardiomyogenesis of ES cells by PPAR{alpha} agonists.


Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effect of the PPAR{alpha} agonist WY14643 on PPAR{alpha} mRNA (A) and cardiac gene (B) expression as evaluated by real time RT-PCR. For the analysis of PPAR{alpha} mRNA expression ES cells were treated from day 4 to day 15 with 10 µM WY14643 and mRNA was extracted every 24 hours. For the analysis of cardiac gene expression ES cells were treated from day 4 to day 8 of cell culture with 10 µM WY14643 and mRNA extraction was performed on day 8. The data in (A) are presented as relative change in mRNA expression as compared to the untreated control on day 5 (set to 100%). The data in (B) are presented as relative change in mRNA expression as compared to the untreated control on day 8 of differentiation (set to 100%). *, p < .05, statistically significant as compared to the untreated control.

 
If PPAR{alpha} activation indeed stimulates cardiomyogenic differentiation of ES cells rather then enhancing cardiomyocyte survival it should be assumed that PPAR{alpha} agonists increase the expression of cardiogenic transcription factors. To investigate this issue the mRNA expression of the cardiogenic transcription factors GATA-4, Nkx2.5, DTEF-1, and MEF 2C, was evaluated following treatment of 4-day-old embryoid bodies until day 8 of cell culture with WY14643 (10 µM) (Fig. 5A–5D). It was evident that already a 24 hour treatment with WY14643 (from day 4 to day 5) significantly increased GATA-4, Nkx2.5, and DTEF-1 gene expression, whereas a significant increase in MEF 2C mRNA expression was observed after 48 hours. Hence the data of the present study indicate that PPAR{alpha} stimulation indeed stimulated the cardiogenic transcriptional program.


Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Effect of the PPAR{alpha} agonist WY14643 on the expression of the cardiogenic transcriptional program. Embryoid bodies were treated from day 4 to day 8 of cell culture with 10 µM WY14643 and mRNA expression of the cardiogenic transcription factors GATA-4, Nkx2.5, DTEF-1 and MEF 2C was analyzed every 24 hours by real time RT PCR. The data were normalized against the untreated control on day 5 (set to 100%). *, p < .05, statistically significant as compared to the untreated control.

 
Generation of ROS by PPAR{alpha} Agonists in ES Cells, Role of NADPH Oxidase
Previous work from our group has demonstrated that ES cells endogenously generate ROS during differentiation towards cardiac cells and express NOX enzymes [13]. Furthermore, we [12, 13] and others, [14] have demonstrated that exogenous treatment of ES cell-derived embryoid bodies with ROS induced cardiac differentiation of ES cells. Since comparable mechanisms may underlie the effects of PPAR{alpha} agonists on cardiomyogenesis of ES cells, 4-day-old embryoid bodies were incubated for 24 hours with the PPAR{alpha} agonists WY14643 (10 µM), GW7647 (10 µM), and ciprofibrate (10 µM); the PPAR{alpha} antagonist MK886 (10 µM); the PPARβ agonist L-165,041 (10 µM) and the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW1929 (10 µM). Subsequently the tissues were incubated with the redox-sensitive ROS indicator H2DCFDA and ROS generation was monitored (Fig. 6AB, n = 6). Whereas, PPAR{alpha} agonists significantly increased ROS generation, a significant downregulation of ROS generation was observed in the presence of the PPAR{alpha} antagonist MK886. In contrast to the effects of PPAR{alpha} agonists, no effects on ROS generation within embryoid bodies was observed upon stimulation of PPARβ and PPAR{gamma} receptors. To investigate whether ROS generation induced by PPAR{alpha} agonists was due to stimulation of NADPH oxidase, embryoid bodies were co-incubated with the NADPH oxidase inhibitors DPI (100 nM - 10 µM) and apocynin (10 µM) (Fig. 6C, n = 3). Both inhibitors of NADPH oxidase significantly reduced the increase in ROS generation achieved with WY14643, GW7647, and ciprofibrate suggesting NOX enzymes as the source of ROS generation. Furthermore, preincubation with the free radical scavengers vitamin E (trolox) (100 µM) and NMPG (100 µM) completely abolished ROS generation induced by the PPAR{alpha} agonist WY14643 (Fig. 6D, n = 4). To exclude a contribution of the respiratory chain in PPAR{alpha}-mediated ROS generation 4-day-old embryoid bodies were incubated for 24 hours with 2 µM rotenone which inhibits the mitochondrial electron transport complex I. As shown in Figure 6E, (n = 3) rotenone neither impaired the increase in ROS generation upon treatment with WY14643 nor inhibited the basal ROS generation in embryoid bodies which strongly suggests that the respiratory chain is not involved in ROS generation of differentiating ES cells.


Figure 6
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Effects of PPAR{alpha} -β and {gamma} agonists and MK886 on ROS generation (A, B) in embryoid bodies cultivated from ES cells; role of NADPH oxidase inhibition (C), free radical scavengers (D), and inhibition of the mitochondrial complex I (E) on PPAR{alpha}-induced ROS generation. (A, B): Embryoid bodies were incubated on day 4 of cell culture with 10 µM of either WY14643, GW7647, ciprofibrate, the PPAR{alpha} antagonist MK886, the PPARβ agonist L-165,041 or the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW1929; ROS generation was monitored 24 hours thereafter. (A): Representative images showing single embryoid bodies stained with the fluorescent ROS indicator H2DCFDA. The bar in the image represents 200 µm. (B): Semiquantitative analysis of ROS generation upon treatment with PPAR agonists and MK886. (C): 4-day-old embryoid bodies were treated for 24 hours with PPAR{alpha} agonists in the presence of the NADPH oxidase inhibitors DPI and apocynin and DCF fluorescence was recorded thereafter. DPI was applied in a concentration of 100 nM when used together with WY14643 and in a concentration of 10 µM with GW7647 and ciprofibrate; apocynin was used in a concentration of 10 µM. (D, E): 4-day-old embryoid bodies were treated for 24 hours with WY14643 in the presence of either 100 µM vitamin E, 100 µM NMPG (D) or 2 µM rotenone (E); ROS generation was monitored 24 hours thereafter. Note that treatment with NADPH oxidase inhibitors as well as free radical scavengers significantly attenuated the increase in ROS generation observed upon activation of PPAR{alpha}, whereas rotenone was without effects. * p < .05, statistically significant as indicated.

 
Inhibition of WY14643-Induced Cardiomyogenesis of ES Cells by Free Radical Scavengers and Antagonists of NADPH Oxidase
The data of the present study suggest that PPAR{alpha} agonists stimulate cardiomyogenesis of ES cells by inducing ROS generation through NOX enzymes. The effect of PPAR{alpha} agonists on cardiomyogenesis should therefore be consequently inhibited in the presence of free radical scavengers as well as inhibitors of NADPH oxidase. To investigate this issue embryoid bodies were treated from day 4 to day 10 of cell culture either in the presence of WY14643 (10 µM), WY14643 in the presence of vitamin E (100 µM) and NMPG (100 µM), or with free radical scavengers alone (Fig. 7A, 7B). In parallel embryoid bodies were treated with WY14643 in the presence of either DPI (100 nM), or apocynin (10 µM), or with NADPH oxidase inhibitors alone (Fig. 7C). In agreement with our working hypothesis, the effect of WY14643 on cardiomyogenesis as evaluated by counting spontaneous contracting foci of cardiomyocytes (see Fig. 7A, n = 4) or assessing the size of beating foci by immunohistochemical analysis of {alpha}-actinin-positive cell areas (see Fig. 7B, n = 3), was totally abolished in the presence of free radical scavengers. Furthermore, cardiomyogenesis was significantly inhibited in the presence of DPI and apocynin (see Fig. 7C, n = 4), thus clearly indicating that PPAR{alpha} agonists stimulate cardiomyogenesis of ES cells by a ROS-dependent mechanism that involves activity of NADPH oxidase.


Figure 7
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Effects of free radical scavengers (A, B) and NADPH oxidase inhibition (C) on the stimulation of cardiomyogenesis of ES cells achieved with the PPAR{alpha} agonist WY14643. Embryoid bodies were treated from day 4 to day 10 of cell culture with WY14643 (10 µM) either in the presence or absence of vitamin E (100 µM) or NMPG (100 µM) or the NADPH oxidase inhibitors DPI (100 nM) or apocynin (10 µM). On day 10 of cell culture either the number of spontaneously contracting foci was counted by microscopical inspection (A, C) or the size of the spontaneously contracting foci was analyzed after immunohistochemical staining with {alpha}-actinin by computer-assisted image analysis (B). Note that treatment with NADPH oxidase antagonists not only abolished the stimulation of cardiomyogenesis achieved with WY14643 but also significantly depressed the number of spontaneously contracting cardiomyocytes when DPI and apocynin were applied in the absence of PPAR{alpha} agonist. *, p < .05, significantly different as indicated.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The energy demands of the contracting heart are met above all by ATP generation through oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria. The major energy substrate within the mitochondria is fatty acids which are catabolized within the mitochondria via the fatty acid β-oxidation pathway, generating reducing equivalents for the electron transport chain and acetyl-CoA as a substrate for further oxidation in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) [15]. In the current study it was shown that PPAR{alpha} agonists are stimulating cardiomyogenesis of ES cells comparably to a recent study by Ding et al. [9]. PPAR{alpha} activation apparently induced the cardiogenic transcriptional program rather than promoting cardiac cell survival since WY14643 induced cardiogenic transcription factors prior to the appearance of spontaneously contracting (mature) cardiomyocytes in the cell culture. Previously it has been shown that inhibition of the respiratory chain in ES cells by antimycin A, totally abolished cardiomyogenesis, suggesting that proper mitochondrial function is a prerequisite for ES cell-derived cardiac differentiation [16]. The data of the present study demonstrate that PPAR{alpha} stimulation resulted in generation of ROS presumably by NADPH oxidases, since pharmacological inhibitors abolished the response. A contribution of ROS generation by the respiratory chain could be excluded since the complex I inhibitor rotenone was without effects. This finding is in contrast to recent in vivo studies which showed that PPAR{alpha} activation could diminish postischemic cardiomyocytic apoptosis and ROS-mediated injuries after global cardiac arrest under cardiopulmonary bypass, possibly via prevention of both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent apoptotic pathways [17]. On the other hand, it has been recently reported that activation of PPAR{alpha} in mice leads to increased cardiac fatty acid oxidation and subsequent accumulation of oxidative stress intermediates in the heart, resulting in cardiomyocyte necrosis [18]. Furthermore, it has been shown that PPAR{alpha} induces NADPH oxidase activity in macrophages [19]. In embryoid bodies derived from mouse ES cells macrophage differentiation has been demonstrated to occur on day 10 of cell culture [20], which is beyond the time frame of our experiments where incubations with PPAR{alpha} agonists were undertaken between day 4 and day 10 in cell culture. Data from our group have recently shown that NOX-2, which is the NADPH oxidase isoform present in macrophages, is maximally expressed in embryoid bodies on day 12 of cell culture. NOX-2 expression is preceded by the transient expression of NOX-1 which has its maximum on day 8 of cell culture. NOX-4 was continuously expressed during the whole cell culture time but displayed elevated expression levels around day 15 of ES cell culture [13]. The peak in PPAR{alpha} expression well coincided with the expression maximum of NOX-2, which is the NADPH isoform of macrophages. Since we found that the macrophage marker CD68 was expressed during this time, it may be assumed that PPAR{alpha}-induced ROS generation may at least partially be mediated by macrophage activation. In the present study it is furthermore shown that the expression of the macrophage marker CD68 coincides with the expression of the cardiac marker {alpha}-MHC suggesting that ROS derived from macrophages indeed may be involved in cardiac cell commitment. We can therefore not exclude that PPAR{alpha} agonists induce differentiation of macrophages which may add to the global ROS generation observed by addition of PPAR{alpha} agonists in the whole embryoid body tissue. Interestingly, ROS generation was only achieved with PPAR{alpha} agonists, whereas the PPARβ agonist L-165,041 and the PPAR{gamma} agonist GW1929 were without effect and consequently did not stimulate cardiomyogenesis of ES cells, even though our data demonstrate that PPAR{alpha} as well as PPARβ and -{gamma} are expressed in ES cells already at early stages of differentiation.

The involvement of ROS in cardiomyogenesis and cardiac cell proliferation of mouse ES cells has been extensively studied by us during recent years. It was demonstrated that low levels of ROS generated by either treatment of ES cells with electromagnetic fields, stimulation with the cardiogenic cytokine cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1) [21] or by exogenous addition of H2O2 to the cell culture medium [12, 13] significantly increased the expression of cardiac genes and transcription factors as well as the number and extension of spontaneously contracting cardiac foci. The effects were abolished in the presence of NADPH oxidase inhibitors, suggesting that the rapid elevation of ROS after stimulation was followed by a long-term enhancement of NADPH gene expression [13]. Besides stimulated ROS generation ES cells have been shown to endogenously generate ROS through NOX enzymes. This endogenous ROS generation apparently controls cardiomyogenesis since inactivation of NOX-4 by si-RNA technology totally abolished cardiomyogenesis of ES cells, thus suggesting that cardiac cell differentiation indeed requires NADPH oxidase activity [14]. The control of NOX enzyme expression and ROS generation during the differentiation of ES cells has not yet been unraveled. It may be assumed that during cardiovascular differentiation of ES cells, and with the onset of beating activity the energy demand of the growing tissue is increased thus initiating a switch from glycolytic ATP generation towards fatty acid oxidation. This switch in energy metabolism consequently requires increased expression and function of PPARs which may, besides their function in stimulating fatty acid metabolism, increase ROS generation thereby adjusting cardiomyogenesis and cardiac cell proliferation of ES cells to the increasing energy demand within the differentiating cardiac tissue. Whether a comparable mechanism of increased energy supply and cardiac hyperplasia exists in vivo remains elusive. Previous studies on PPAR{alpha} homo-knockout (–/–) mice have demonstrated no severe impairment of viability and embryonic heart development, although these mice displayed reduced expression of lipid transporters, enzymes of β-oxidation as well as myocardial uptake and oxidation of long chain fatty acids. However, PPAR{alpha} seemingly plays a role in cardiac function since PPAR{alpha}–/– mice have an alteration of cardiac contractile performance under basal and under stimulation of β1-adrenergic receptors which are associated with myocardial fibrosis [22].

PPAR{alpha} agonists are widely used in clinical practice for the treatment of dyslipidemia to reduce the cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, some studies suggested that PPAR ligands may be involved in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy, inflammation, vascular function, and vascular remodelling, thus highlighting extra potential indications for these agents [2]. Since stem cell therapy within the heart appears to be a reasonable therapeutic regime to cure cardiovascular diseases in the future, a potential treatment of patients with PPAR agonists may be exploitable to enhance cardiomyogenic differentiation and cardiac cell proliferation within the area of transplantation, in parallel to exerting beneficial effects on the pathogenesis of heart failure [23], hypertrophy [24], and atherosclerosis [25].


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This work was supported by the DFG graduate college 534 and the DFG Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary System (ECCPS).


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Finck BN. The PPAR regulatory system in cardiac physiology and disease. Cardiovasc Res 2007;73:269–277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Balakumar P, Rose M, Singh M. PPAR Ligands: Are They Potential Agents for Cardiovascular Disorders? Pharmacology 2007;80:1–10.[CrossRef][Medline]

  3. Planavila A, Calvo RR, Vazquez-Carrera M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and the control of fatty acid oxidation in cardiac hypertrophy. Mini Rev Med Chem 2006;6:357–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

  4. Barger PM, Brandt JM, Leone TC et al. Deactivation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha during cardiac hypertrophic growth. J Clin Invest 2000;105:1723–1730.[Medline]

  5. Goikoetxea MJ, Beaumont J, Gonzalez A et al. Altered cardiac expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-isoforms in patients with hypertensive heart disease. Cardiovasc Res 2006;69:899–907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Braissant O, Wahli W. Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha, -beta, and -gamma during rat embryonic development. Endocrinology 1998;139:2748–2754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Lee SS, Pineau T, Drago J et al. Targeted disruption of the alpha isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15:3012–3022.[Abstract]

  8. Leone TC, Weinheimer CJ, Kelly DP. A critical role for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) in the cellular fasting response: the PPARalpha-null mouse as a model of fatty acid oxidation disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:7473–7478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Ding L, Liang X, Zhu D et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha is involved in cardiomyocyte differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells in vitro. Cell Biol Int 2007;31:1002–1009.[CrossRef][Medline]

  10. Schmelter M, Ateghang B, Helmig S et al. Embryonic stem cells utilize reactive oxygen species as transducers of mechanical strain-induced cardiovascular differentiation. FASEB J 2006;20:1182–1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Sauer H, Bekhite MM, Hescheler J et al. Redox control of angiogenic factors and CD31-positive vessel-like structures in mouse embryonic stem cells after direct current electrical field stimulation. Exp Cell Res 2005;304:380–390.[CrossRef][Medline]

  12. Sauer H, Rahimi G, Hescheler J et al. Role of reactive oxygen species and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells. FEBS Lett 2000;476:218–223.[CrossRef][Medline]

  13. Buggisch M, Ateghang B, Ruhe C et al. Stimulation of ES-cell-derived cardiomyogenesis and neonatal cardiac cell proliferation by reactive oxygen species and NADPH oxidase. J Cell Sci 2007;120:885–894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Li J, Stouffs M, Serrander L et al. The NADPH oxidase NOX-4 drives cardiac differentiation: Role in regulating cardiac transcription factors and MAP kinase activation. Mol Biol Cell 2006;17:3978–3988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Lehman JJ, Barger PM, Kovacs A et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 promotes cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis. J Clin Invest 2000;106:847–856.[Medline]

  16. Spitkovsky D, Sasse P, Kolossov E et al. Activity of complex III of the mitochondrial electron transport chain is essential for early heart muscle cell differentiation. FASEB J 2004;18:1300–1302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Yeh CH, Chen TP, Lee CH et al. Cardiomyocytic apoptosis following global cardiac ischemia and reperfusion can be attenuated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha but not gamma activators. Shock 2006;26:262–270.[CrossRef][Medline]

  18. Pruimboom-Brees I, Haghpassand M, Royer L et al. A critical role for peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-alpha nuclear receptors in the development of cardiomyocyte degeneration and necrosis. Am J Pathol 2006;169:750–760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Teissier E, Nohara A, Chinetti G et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha induces NADPH oxidase activity in macrophages, leading to the generation of LDL with PPAR-alpha activation properties. Circ Res 2004;95:1174–1182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Wiles MV, Keller G. Multiple hematopoietic lineages develop from embryonic stem (ES) cells in culture. Development 1991;111:259–267.[Abstract]

  21. Sauer H, Neukirchen W, Rahimi G et al. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in cardiotrophin-1-induced proliferation of cardiomyocytes differentiated from murine embryonic stem cells. Exp Cell Res 2004;294:313–324.[CrossRef][Medline]

  22. Loichot C, Jesel L, Tesse A et al. Deletion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha induces an alteration of cardiac functions. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;291:H161–H166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Ichihara S, Obata K, Yamada Y et al. Attenuation of cardiac dysfunction by a PPAR-alpha agonist is associated with down-regulation of redox-regulated transcription factors. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2006;41:318–329.[CrossRef][Medline]

  24. Rose M, Balakumar P, Singh M. Ameliorative Effect of Combination of Fenofibrate and Rosiglitazone in Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy in Rats. Pharmacology 2007;80:177–184.[CrossRef][Medline]

  25. Verma S, Szmitko PE. The vascular biology of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: Modulation of atherosclerosis. Can J Cardiol 2006;22 (Suppl B):12B–17B.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2007-0532v1
26/1/64    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharifpanah, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharifpanah, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS