Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online May 8, 2008
Stem Cells Vol. 26 No. 7 July 2008, pp. 1663 -1672
doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0884; www.StemCells.com
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Abstract
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
2007-0884v1
26/7/1663    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osumi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Maekawa, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osumi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Maekawa, M.

TISSUE-SPECIFIC STEM CELLS

Concise Review: Pax6 Transcription Factor Contributes to both Embryonic and Adult Neurogenesis as a Multifunctional Regulator

Noriko Osumia, Hiroshi Shinoharaa, Keiko Numayama-Tsurutaa,b, Motoko Maekawaa,c

aDivision of Developmental Neuroscience, Center for Translational and Advanced Animal Research, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan;
bREDEEM, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan;
cLaboratory for Molecular Psychiatry, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan

Key Words. Embryonic neurogenesis • Adult neurogenesis • Pax6 transcription factor • Neural stem cells • Proliferation • Differentiation

Correspondence: Noriko Osumi, Ph.D., D.D.S., Division of Developmental Neuroscience, Center for Translational and Advanced Animal Research, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan. Telephone: 81-22-717-8201; Fax: 81-22-717-8205; e-mail: osumi{at}mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp

Received October 20, 2007; accepted for publication April 10, 2008.
First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS   May 8, 2008.


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Pax6 is a highly conserved transcription factor among vertebrates and is important in various developmental processes in the central nervous system (CNS), including patterning of the neural tube, migration of neurons, and formation of neural circuits. In this review, we focus on the role of Pax6 in embryonic and postnatal neurogenesis, namely, production of new neurons from neural stem/progenitor cells, because Pax6 is intensely expressed in these cells from the initial stage of CNS development and in neurogenic niches (the subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus and the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricle) throughout life. Pax6 is a multifunctional player regulating proliferation and differentiation through the control of expression of different downstream molecules in a highly context-dependent manner.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Pax6 was first identified as a paired box (Pax) family member and cloned on the basis of its homology to the Drosophila gene paired [1]. Pax6 is also responsible for a human eye disease called aniridia and for the mouse mutant Small eye [2, 3]. Pax6 is a highly conserved transcription factor containing two DNA binding domains, a paired domain (PD) and a paired-type homeodomain (HD) (Fig. 1A; a more detailed explanation is given below), and is crucial for the development of the central nervous system (CNS), eyes, nose, pancreas, and pituitary gland [46]. Pax6 is expressed in specific spatiotemporal patterns during mammalian brain development and thus is thought to be upstream of gene networks involved in brain patterning, neuronal migration, and neural circuit formation (reviewed in [79]).


Figure 1
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Expression of Pax6 in the cortical primordium. (A): Schematic structure of the Pax6, Pax6(5a), and Pax6({Delta}PD) proteins. PAI and RED are sub-domains of "paired" domain. (B): Pax6 expression at the neuromere stage. (C): Expression of Pax6 (magenta) in the cortical primordium of mouse embryo at E12. DAPI (blue) shows cell nuclei. (D, E): Immunoreactivity of Pax6 (magenta), DAPI (blue), Tuj1 (a marker for neurons; green [D]), and Ngn2 (green [E]) in the cortical primordium of mouse embryos at E10, E12, and E14. Pax6 is expressed in the VZ, but not in neurons (D). Ngn2 is also expressed in a certain number of cells in the VZ (E). Notably, neuroepithelial cells strongly expressing Ngn2 are negative for Pax6 (arrowheads [E], inset). Scale bars = 80 µm (C) and 20 µm (D, E). (F): Neurogenesis of post-mitotic neuron from a radial glial cell. Sequential expression of Pax6 (magenta) and Tbr2 (green) is indicated by colored bars and corresponding colors in cell nuclei. Abbreviations: BPC, basal progenitor cell; CP, cortical plate; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; di, diencephalons; E, embryonic day; FB, forebrain; HB, hindbrain; HD, homeodomain; IM, intermediate zone; IPC, intermediate progenitor cell; MB, midbrain; PD, paired domain; PS, pia surface; PST, Pro/Ser/Thr-rich region; r, rhombomere; RGC, radial glial cell; SVZ, subventricular zone; tel, telencephalon; Tuj1, anti-class III β-tubulin antibody; VS, ventricular surface; VZ, ventricular zone.

 
The function of Pax6 in development has been studied by examining the phenotypes of several mutant lines of mice and rats, including mouse Sey and SeyNeu [3] and rat rSey [10] and rSey2 [11], all of which have mutations in the Pax6 gene. Although Pax6 heterozygous mutant mice/rats show a small-eye phenotype with various malformations in the eye [1215], there is no apparent difference in gross brain anatomy between Pax6 heterozygous mutants and the wild-type (WT) littermates during the embryonic and neonatal stages. Homozygous mutant embryos lack the eyes and nose and die soon after birth [16, 17]. These mutant phenotypes are similar to an artificially targeted Pax6-deficient mouse (Pax6–/–) [18]. The Sey mouse mutant contains a single base substitution that truncates the C-terminal half of Pax6 [3], and the rSey2 rat mutant has a single base inserted into the coding region adjacent to the paired domain of Pax6, leading to a frame shift and premature stop codon [11]. The mRNA of Pax6 is expressed in both Sey mice and rSey2 rat homozygous mutants, whereas truncated Pax6 protein is not detected in the embryonic brain of rSey2 rat but is detected in that of Sey mouse [19]. Since Pax6Sey mutation results in production of a truncated protein that lacks a DNA-binding homeodomain and the C-terminal activation domain, the truncated Pax6 is considered functionally inactive. Therefore, both Sey mouse and rSey2 rat homozygous mutants are widely used as Pax6-null mutants.

In this review, we focus on the role of Pax6 in neurogenesis, that is, the production of new neurons from neural stem/progenitor cells, especially in the embryonic telencephalon and postnatal hippocampus. Pax6 is crucial for maintaining these neural stem/progenitor cells, but, interestingly, it can also promote neuronal differentiation in context-dependent manners.


    ROLE OF PAX6 IN EMBRYONIC NEUROGENESIS
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Pax6 Expression in CNS Development
Pax6 expression starts from the earliest stage of CNS development, that is, at embryonic day 8 (E8) in the mouse (corresponding to E10 in the rat), when the neural plate (i.e., the primordium of the CNS) consists entirely of proliferating neuroepithelial cells. At E10 in mice, when the neural tube is regionalized, Pax6 is expressed in the forebrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord (Fig. 1B) [20]. In this review, we focus on the dorsal telencephalon, that is, the primordium of the cerebral cortex. Pax6 is expressed in the ventricular (germinal) zone (VZ) that lines the wall of the lateral ventricle but not in the small number of neurons in the marginal zone near the brain surface (Fig. 1C, 1D). These early-born neurons are Cajal-Retzius cells that are derived from the medial and lateral edges of the dorsal telencephalon (reviewed in [21]). The thickness of the VZ layer increases up to E12 (Fig. 1D), when production of glutamatergic pyramidal neurons reaches peak levels in the dorsal telencephalon. The cortical primordium also receives {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic inhibitory interneurons that originate from the ventral telencephalon [22, 23]. During these stages of embryonic neurogenesis, Pax6 expression persists in the VZ of the dorsal telencephalon and the boundary region between the dorsal and ventral telencephalon [24]. At later stages, the VZ gradually becomes thinner and finally forms the ependymal layer that lines the wall of the lateral ventricle. The ependymal layer also expresses Pax6 (unpublished data).

Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells in Embryonic Neurogenesis
Histologically, the VZ predominantly contains "nuclei" of neuroepithelial cells (Fig. 1C, 1D), but at the cellular level, the neuroepithelial cells themselves have long apical and basal processes stretching between the ventricular surface and the basement membrane (Fig. 2A). As formation of new neurons (i.e., neurogenesis) proceeds, the neuroepithelial cells become longer and longer. These cells are also called "radial glia" because their processes locate radially within the cortical primordium and serve as a scaffold for newly born neurons to climb up toward the pial surface. The terminology of the radial glia is somewhat confusing; they are actually not simple glial cells but are rather currently recognized as neural stem/progenitor cells that produce neurons [25, 26]. However, interestingly, these radial glial cells exhibit astroglial properties at the molecular level [2729]. These neural stem/progenitor cells (i.e., neuroepithelial cells and radial glial cells) undergo mitosis at the apical ventricular surface [29, 30]. Each of these cells divides symmetrically to produce two neural stem/progenitor cells or asymmetrically to produce a daughter cell fated to become a neuron (or neurons) and a neural stem/progenitor cell [3133]. These neuroepithelial cells and radial glial cells that divide at the ventricular surface strongly express Pax6 (Fig. 1D–1F) [34]. There is another type of neuronal progenitor cells that divide in the subventricular zone (SVZ) to produce two neurons. These are called "basal progenitors" or "intermediate progenitors" and originate from mitosis of radial glial cells that have lost the radial processes [3133]. Interestingly, the latter basal/intermediate progenitor cells are negative for Pax6 (Fig. 1F) but positive for other transcription factors (described below) [29, 35].


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Multiple functions of Pax6 via different downstream molecules. (A): Roles of Pax6 in regulation of proliferation and differentiation of neuroepithelial cells. The cells shown in blue and yellow are a neuroepithelial cell and a neuron, respectively. (B): List of Pax6 downstream molecules that control cell proliferation (blue), cell differentiation (yellow), cell adhesion (pink), and patterning (green) and thus govern multiple functions of Pax6.

 
Transcriptional Regulation of Embryonic Neurogenesis
Many transcription factors are expressed in the cortical primordium [3638]. Among them, Neurogenin2 (Ngn2), a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor, is expressed in the neuronal progenitor cells and strongly induces the production of glutamatergic neurons [39]. Pax6 expression overlaps with that of Ngn2 in a small number of neuronal progenitor cells (Fig. 1E, inset), and Pax6 may regulate transcription of Ngn2 ([40]; also described below). There is some overlapped expression of Pax6 with T-box brain gene (Tbr) 2, a T-domain transcription factor in the developing brain, but Tbr2 is expressed mainly in basal/intermediate progenitors (Fig. 1F) [35]. Although sequential expression of the transcription factors is difficult to demonstrate directly in a single cell, there may be a transition of expression of the transcription factors from Pax6 -> Ngn2 -> Tbr2 -> neurogenic differentiation (NeuroD) -> Tbr1 [34]. NeuroD is another bHLH transcription factor expressed in the neocortex and hippocampus and necessary for proliferation and postnatal differentiation of dentate gyrus (DG) neurons [41, 42]. Tbr1, another member of T-domain transcription factors, is expressed in all cortical pyramidal-projection neurons and regulates layer-related differentiation, cell migration, and axon pathfinding in the neocortex [34]. Considering this sequential expression of transcription factors, Pax6 seems to be crucial in the earliest steps of cortical neurogenesis.

To Proliferate or to Differentiate, That Is the Question
In the above-mentioned Pax6 mutants, the development of the cortex is severely impaired; production of neurons is dramatically reduced, leading to a thinner cortical plate [4348]. This finding has lead to the idea that Pax6 promotes "neuronal differentiation." Supportive data for this model are provided by Götz et al. [49] and Heins et al. [50], who assayed the effects of transfected Pax6 in cultured cells isolated from the developing cortex. Introduction of the Pax6-expression vector induced more neurons than in control.

Pax6 mutant cortical primordia simultaneously show a paradoxical phenotype: a thinner VZ, with reduced expression of PCNA, a marker for proliferating cells [47]. From a detailed analysis of cell-cycle kinetics, Estivill-Torrus et al. suggested that the absence of Pax6 accelerated cortical neurogenesis in vivo [48]. More recently, Quinn et al. used chimera techniques to show that underproduction of neurons in the Sey/Sey cortex is caused by early depletion of the progenitor pool via abnormally high proportions of newly divided cells exiting the cell cycle [51]. They have proposed a model in which Pax6 functions early in cortical development to prevent precocious neuronal differentiation and depletion of the progenitor pool and to induce normal development of basal/intermediate progenitor cells by regulating the expression of Tbr2 [51]. Our previous finding that the formation of later-born neurons is more affected in rSey2/rSey2 cortical primordium [47] is in accordance with this model. This effect on later-born neurons in Pax6 mutants may be due to depletion of the neurogenic progenitor pool during the preceding days, as suggested by Quinn et al. [51].

Similarly, a study on the development of the retina, which expresses Pax6 and is considered a part of the forebrain, reported precocious neuronal differentiation with upregulation of Mash1, another proneural bHLH factor, in Sey/Sey embryos [52]. In adult mammalian eyes, Pax6 is required for the proliferation and expansion of retinal stem cells [53]. Another report, however, showed that neuroepithelial progenitors are more abundant than normal in the Pax6 mutant retina [54], conflicting with the data of Philips et al. [52] and Xu et al. [53]. This intriguing issue of Pax6 as a binary player promoting cell proliferation or cell differentiation in a context-dependent manner is discussed in the next section.


    MOLECULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS OF PAX6
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Regulation Based on Expression Levels and Isoforms of Pax6
The mammalian Pax6 locus encodes at least three isoforms: the "canonical" Pax6, Pax6(5a), and Pax6({Delta}PD). The canonical Pax6 protein contains a PD near the N terminus, a paired-type HD in the middle, and a proline/serine/threonine-rich (PST) domain at the C terminus (Fig. 1A). Both the PD and the HD have DNA binding activities, whereas the PST domain possesses a transactivation function [5558]. Pax6(5a) is produced through alternative splicing retaining exon 5a and contains a 14-residue insertion in the N-terminal subdomain of PD, which alters the DNA binding specificity [57, 59] (Fig. 1A). Both Pax6 and Pax6(5a) mRNAs are expressed in the telencephalon, diencephalon, and hindbrain, and interestingly, the expression levels of Pax6 in these tissues are 6–10 times higher than that of Pax6(5a) during early neurogenesis [60]. The third Pax6 isoform, which lacks PD (Fig. 1A), arises from an alternative promoter between exons 4 and 5 and an alternative translation start codon in exon 7 [61, 62]. Although Pax6({Delta}PD) mRNA is also detected in the embryonic forebrain, its expression level is much lower than that of Pax6 [63]. Overexpression of Pax6({Delta}PD) causes a severe microphthalmic phenotype that is due to apoptotic cell death in the lens during embryonic development [62, 64], whereas the role of Pax6({Delta}PD) in brain development, if any, is unknown at present. Haubst et al. showed that the PD of Pax6 is required for regulation of neurogenesis, cell proliferation, and patterning by comparing the telencephalic development in several lines of mutant mice harboring mutations in distinct DNA binding domains of Pax6 [65]. Furthermore, retroviral overexpression of Pax6(5a) inhibited cell proliferation but not cell fate, whereas Pax6 affected both proliferation and cell fate [65]. Therefore, the PD of Pax6 is crucial in normal brain development.

With regard to the expression of Pax6 locus, at least six enhancer regions and three promoters (P0, P1, and P{alpha}) have been identified (reviewed in [65]). Both canonical Pax6 and Pax6(5a) mRNAs are produced by transcription from both P0 and P1 promoters, whereas the transcript from P{alpha} promoter encodes Pax6({Delta}PD) [61, 62]. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that control transcriptional levels of distinct Pax6 isoforms in CNS development. Interestingly, several putative Pax6 binding sites are often present in different species in a position equivalent to that of the Pax6 gene [66]. Within the head surface ectoderm-specific enhancer of Pax6 gene, it has been demonstrated that Pax6 directly interacts with Pax6-responsive element and positively regulates its own gene expression [67]. On the other hand, crossing Pax6 yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) transgenic mice with a Pax6-tau-GFP reporter YAC transgenic line showed that increased expression of Pax6 is limited by negative autoregulation [68]. These studies suggest that Pax6 levels are stabilized by positive and negative autoregulation in vivo. It is reported that proliferation of the cortical progenitors is sensitive to altered Pax6 levels, whereas cortical regionalization is not [68]. Activated expression of either Pax6 or Pax6(5a) inhibits progenitor proliferation in the developing cortex [69]. Upon activation of transgenic Pax6, specific progenitor pools with distinct endogenous Pax6 expression levels at different developmental stages show defects in cell cycle progression and in the acquisition of apoptotic or neuronal cell fate [69]. In the mouse optic vesicle, Pax6 overexpression also represses proliferation of neuroepithelial cells [54]. Taken together, the isoforms of Pax6 and their expression levels are important for the proliferation of neuroepithelial progenitors in the cortical and retinal primordia.

Partners of Pax6 in Transcriptional Regulation
The complexity of Pax6 function could be based not only on the internal DNA-binding domain usages in individual isoforms but also on the capability of Pax6 to interact with various transcription factors and to synergistically regulate target gene expression. In lens development, transcriptional regulation of several crystallin genes by Pax6 is coordinately achieved with other transcription factors, such as Sox2 and Maf (reviewed by Cvekl et al. [70] and Kondoh et al. [71]). For example, Pax6 forms a co-DNA-binding complex with Sox2, a high-mobility group domain-containing transcription factor, for transcriptional activation of the {delta}-crystallin gene [72]. In case of the above-mentioned positive autoregulation of Pax6 gene, Sox2 and Sox3 activate the enhancer synergistically with Pax6 and form a complex with Pax6 also [67]. Synergistic activation of the glucagon gene promoter by Pax6 and Cdx2 and by Pax6 and Maf transcription factors is also reported in the pancreas [73, 74]. Thus, it is highly likely that Pax6 functions together with cobinding partners during neurogenesis. A good candidate is Sox2, since it is expressed in the developing mouse CNS from an early stage [75] and regulates the expression of fibroblast growth factor 4 (Fgf4) and nestin, which are important in maintaining neural stem cells [76]. POU transcription factors, which are expressed during neurogenesis, control the expression of two CNS stem cell-specific genes, nestin and brain-type fatty acid binding protein (B-Fabp, or Fabp7; described below) [77]. Sox2 and POU transcription factors synergistically activate Fgf4 and nestin [78, 79]. Therefore, it would be interesting to know whether there is also interplay between Pax6 and Sox2 or Pax6 and POU factors in neurogenesis. Expression of Tlx, a forebrain-restricted transcription factor, also overlaps with that of Pax6 [80], and genetic data suggest that Pax6 and Tlx cooperate in the formation of the dorsoventral boundary in the telencephalon [81] and in specification of later-born (upper-layer) neurons [82]. It will be important to elucidate their mutual target genes in different phases of corticogenesis. Furthermore, cooperative transcriptional regulation by Pax6 with these factors should be elucidated in more detail in the future.

Although Pax6 is primarily a transcriptional activator, the molecular mechanisms of "negative" transcriptional regulation by Pax6 with some other transcription factors have recently been identified. The MAD homology 1 domain of Smad3, which is a direct mediator of TGF-β signaling, represses autoregulation of the Pax6 P1 promoter by interaction with the PD of Pax6, thereby releasing Pax6 from the promoter element [83]. In a glucagon-producing pancreatic islet cell line, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} binds to the transactivation domain of Pax6 in a ligand- and retinoid X receptor-dependent but DNA-binding-independent manner and blocks glucagon gene transcription by Pax6 [84]. NK homeobox 6.1 (Nkx6.1), a β-cell-specific transcription factor, inhibits glucagon gene transcription in a different manner, by competing for its Pax6-binding site [85]. Thus, Pax6 could play a role in inhibition/repression of transcription under circumstances where the interaction between Pax6 and another factor interferes with the DNA-binding ability or transcriptional activity, also during neurogenesis.

In spinal cord development, loss of Pax6 results in premature specification of oligodendrocytes and astrocytes due to ectopic expression of oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1 (Olig1), Olig2, Nkx2.2, and glutamine synthase [86]. There seems to be mutual repression between Pax6 and these transcription factors, but the molecular mechanisms responsible for this repression have not yet been elucidated.

Downstream Effectors of Pax6 in Embryonic Neurogenesis
Because Pax6 has multiple roles in brain development, many groups, including ours, have looked for genes downstream of Pax6 in the developing CNS. However, there are only few examples that have been strictly proven as direct Pax6 target genes. In this section, we introduce Pax6 downstream molecules, including both direct and indirect targets, in CNS development (summarized in Fig. 2B).

FABP7.   Using microarray analysis, our group identified Fabp7 as a downstream gene of Pax6 in the E12.5 rat cortex [87]. FABP7 (B-FABP/brain lipid binding protein) is a member of the fatty acid-binding protein family and is widely used as a marker for neural stem/progenitor cells (i.e., neuroepithelial cells or radial glia) [77, 88, 89]. Inhibition of FABP7 function by RNA interference in the developing cortex dramatically reduced cell proliferation and conversely increased production of immature neurons [87], indicating that FABP7 is required for the maintenance of proliferating neuroepithelial cells. Expression of Fabp7 in early mouse embryos is drastically different from that of rat embryos; Fabp7 is more intensely expressed in the ventral than the dorsal telencephalon [87]. Transcriptional regulation of the mouse Fabp7 gene is governed by the Notch pathway, which is critical for maintaining stem cells [90]. Therefore, although regulation of Fabp7 expression is different in mice and rats, at least in the early stage of development, FABP7 could generally function to keep neural stem cells in the CNS, which is controlled by Pax6 in the rat cortex primordium. We are now trying to demonstrate that Pax6 directly transactivates rat Fabp7 gene in neural stem/progenitor cells by in vivo and in vitro assays.

Ngn2.   It is known that the Ngn2 gene, coding an already-mentioned proneural bHLH factor, is a direct target of Pax6 [40, 91]. Ngn2 E1 enhancer activity in the spinal cord is almost completely abolished in E1-LacZ transgenic Sey/Sey mouse embryos [92], and a Pax6 binding element has been identified by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) within the E1 enhancer [40]. In addition, the retina-specific E2 enhancer of Ngn2 gene also contains Pax6-responsive element activated in multipotent retinal progenitor cells [91]. When Pax6 is electroporated into the dorsal telencephalon of cultured rat embryos, induction of Ngn2 is observed 3 hours later but disappears by 18 hours, whereas Fabp7 shows continuous induction [87]. This may be due to differential levels of Pax6 protein needed for these two genes to be activated; induction of Ngn2 expression may need a higher Pax6 protein level, which cannot be maintained for 18 hours, whereas a lower Pax6 protein level may be sufficient to induce Fabp7. Another possibility is that transcription of Ngn2 may be induced by Pax6 binding, but Ngn2 protein may subsequently downregulate Pax6 expression. In the posterior neural tube, neuronal precursors maintaining Pax6 expression fail to differentiate, whereas turning off Pax6 function in these precursors is sufficient to provoke premature differentiation [93]. Importantly, Pax6 expression involves negative feedback regulation by Ngn2, and this repression is critical for the proneural activity of Ngn2 [93]. Immunostaining of the mouse cortex primordium using Pax6- and Ngn2-specific antibodies showed that neuroepithelial progenitors that strongly expressed Ngn2 were negative for Pax6 (Fig. 1E, arrowheads), supporting the finding that Ngn2 negatively regulates Pax6. There may be a similar repression of Pax6 by Tbr2, as these proteins show no overlapping expression [35].

p27kip1.   Pax6 is expressed in neuroepithelial cells (neural stem/progenitor cells) of the optic cup (i.e., the primordium of the retina). In the mouse optic vesicle of Pax6 mutant embryos, the number of neuroepithelial progenitors was higher than normal [54]. In vitro, Pax6-null retinal spheres overproliferate and display reduced expression levels of several negative regulators of the cell cycle, such as p16Ink4a, p19Arf, p27kip1, p57kip2, and p21cip1. Pax6 overexpression repressed cellular proliferation and secondary sphere formation, suggesting that Pax6 acts cell-autonomously on the cell cycles of neuroepithelial progenitors. The presence of aberrant numbers of mitotic cells and low expression levels of p27kip1, p57kip2, and p21cip1 were verified in the primitive forebrain of Pax6 mutants. In a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, Pax6 binds to the genomic DNA upstream of the p27kip1 gene encoding a member of the cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)-interacting protein/kinase inhibitor protein (Cip/Kip) family of the cdk inhibitors that negatively regulate G1 cell cycle progression [54]. Therefore, Pax6 controls not only the proliferation rate of neuroepithelial progenitors in the optic vesicle but also that in the cerebral cortex through a direct control of cell cycle regulators such as p27kip1.

Lewis X, FucT9, and Wnt7b.   Other interesting molecules related to neural stem/progenitor proliferation/differentiation include fucosyl transferase IX (FucT9) and CD15/Lewis X glycosyl moiety, which is synthesized by FucT. Lewis X is another marker for some but not all of the population of neural stem cells [94]. We previously reported that the expression of FucT9 and localization of Lewis X were decreased in the cortical primordium of rSey2/rSey2 rat embryos [95], although it is not clearly discerned yet whether Pax6 directly regulates FucT9 gene expression. Interestingly, FACS cells with high Lewis X expression contain more stem cells as assayed in neurospheres [96, 97]. Moreover, expression of Wnt7b is decreased in the developing cortex, hindbrain, and spinal cord of Pax6 mutant mice and rats [11], although the roles of Wnt factors on proliferation and differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells are still debated [98102]. Taken together, Pax6 may comprehensively regulate factors that are important for proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells.

Cell Adhesion Molecules.   Pax6 also controls cell adhesion. Transplantation analyses have revealed that cells isolated from Sey/Sey cortex were segregated from the WT host cells and formed dense clusters [103]. L1 gene, coding a cell adhesion molecule of the Ig superfamily, was the first example of a direct target of Pax6 in the CNS. Pax6 binds to an element within the bone morphogenetic protein-responsive region in the first intron, called the homeodomain and paired domain binding site, and transactivates L1 gene [104]. Optimedin (olfactmedin 3) gene is also a direct downstream target of Pax6 [105]. Optimedin A variant is expressed in the eye and brain, and Pax6 binding to the Optimedin A promoter was confirmed by ChIP assay in vivo [105]. Optimedin is reported to induce the expression of N-cadherin, β-catenin, {alpha}-catenin, and occludin and to stimulate Ca2+-dependent aggregation of nerve growth factor-stimulated PC12 cells [106], suggesting that Pax6 regulates cell-cell adhesion and/or cell attachment to the extracellular matrix indirectly via optimedin gene expression. In the dorsal telencephalon, expression of R-cadherin, one of the Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecules expressed in the mouse fetal brain, is markedly reduced [107, 108], thereby regulating boundary formation in the developing forebrain. However, it is still unknown whether transcriptional regulation of R-cadherin by Pax6 is direct or indirect. Expression of {delta}-catenin, a neural-specific member of the Armadillo-domain subfamily [109] and involved in neuroepithelial cell adhesiveness, was also decreased in the Sey/Sey telencephalon in a microarray analysis conducted by Duparc et al. [110]. Binding of Pax6 to a conserved site on the {delta}-catenin gene was confirmed by EMSA [110]. Since isolated single cells easily differentiate into neurons by default, regulation of adhesiveness in neuroepithelial cells may be also important to maintain proliferation. Moreover, in Pax6-deficient mice, expression of Tenascin C, an extracellular matrix glycoprotein, is lost in the cortex primordium [49]. Tenascin C is widely present in the vertebrate central nervous system during development and repair, and it functions in both neural progenitor proliferation and differentiation of neurons and oligodendrocytes [111, 112]. Furthermore, Pax6 acts as a modulator of alternative splicing and differentially regulates the expression of 20 Tenascin C isoforms [113]. In the transgenic mice that overexpress Pax6(5a) using {alpha}A-crystallin promoter, the expression of {alpha}5β1 integrin, paxillin, and p120ctn in the lens is upregulated [114]. Furthermore, putative Pax6/Pax6(5a) binding sites in the human {alpha}5- and β1-integrin promoters were identified by EMSA [114]. Thus, Pax6 directly or indirectly regulates several aspects of cell-cell and cell-substrate adhesion during development.

Patterning Molecules.   In the neural tube, Pax6 regulates the expression of secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (sFRP2) and T-cell factor 4 (Tcf4), both of which are involved in Wnt signaling [115]. sFRP2 is an extracellular inhibitor of Wnt signaling, and Tcf4 is a member of the Tcf/lymphoid enhancer-binding factor family of transcriptional mediators of canonical Wnt signaling. Pax6 represses Nkx2.2 expression in the ventral spinal cord by regulating the spatially restricted expression of sFRP2 and Tcf4 [116]. Therefore, Pax6 controls ventral patterning by regulating Wnt signaling in neuronal progenitors. In contrast, homeobox (Hox) transcription factors control anteroposterior patterning of the neural tube. ChIP assays revealed that Pax6 associates with Hoxd4 gene enhancer and regulates the expression of Hoxd4 in the mouse embryo [117]. Moreover, Hoxd4 expression is decreased throughout the CNS in Pax6-deficient mouse embryos [117]. Therefore, Pax6 can also regulate anteroposterior-restricted Hoxd4 gene expression. Thus, Pax6 is also important for regulation of both dorsoventral and anteroposterior patterning in the CNS.

Other Transcription Factors.   Moreover, in microarray analyses of tissues from Pax6-dependent (dorsal) or -independent (ventral) telencephalon at E12 and E15, Holm et al. reported the finding of lower expression of various transcription factors involved in neurogenesis (such as satb2, Nfia, AP-2{gamma}, NeuroD6, Ngn2, Tbr2, and Bhlhb5) and of a retinoic acid signaling molecule, Rlbp1, in the dorsal telencephalon of Pax6-deficient mice than in that of the WT [118]. This analysis elucidated time- and region-specific differences in Pax6-mediated transcription, explaining differential functions of Pax6 at early and later stages of neurogenesis. Therefore, Pax6 is a multifunctional player in embryonic neurogenesis by regulating, directly and/or indirectly, the expression of various molecules.

Altogether, Pax6 is a binary player in embryonic neurogenesis, promoting cell division and cell differentiation in a highly context-dependent and complex manner in terms of different protein expression levels, different isoforms, different copartners, different direct target genes, and different indirect downstream effectors.


    PAX6 IN POSTNATAL NEUROGENESIS
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Postnatally, strong expression of Pax6 is detected in neurons in various brain regions, including the olfactory bulb, amygdala, thalamus, and cerebellum [119123]. Modest expression is seen in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampal DG [124, 125] and in the ependymal layer and the SVZ of the lateral ventricle [126, 127], the two areas in which neurogenesis takes place throughout life [128, 129].

In the SGZ, Pax6 is expressed in neural stem/early progenitor cells that show radial glia-like morphology and are positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and nestin, as well as in a small population of late progenitors that are positive for polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM) [124, 125]. GFAP is also a marker for astrocytes, which contribute to approximately 40% of Pax6-expressing cells in the DG (Fig. 3C). An analysis combining 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine-pulse/chase labeling and immunostaining showed that Pax6-expressing cells represent less than 20% of slowly renewing neural stem cells (Fig. 3). On the basis of marker analyses, Hevner et al. have proposed that the transitions from Pax6 expression in radial glia-like progenitors to Tbr2 and NeuroD expression in intermediate stage progenitors and to NeuroD/Tbr1 expression in postmitotic neurons may represent important steps in hippocampal neurogenesis [34].


Figure 3
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Roles of Pax6 in hippocampal neurogenesis. (A): Expression of Pax6 and incorporation of BrdU in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of 4-week-old rat. BrdU was injected 30 min before fixation, and most of the BrdU-labeled cells coexpress Pax6 (arrows), not vice versa. Figures are modified from Maekawa et al. [124]. (B): Percentages of Pax6-expressing cells/BrdU-labeled cells and BrdU-labeled cells/Pax6-expressing cells at 30 min or 2 weeks after BrdU injection. At 30 min, 94.5% ± 3.3% (mean ± SD) of BrdU-labeled cells coexpress Pax6, whereas less than 5% of Pax6-expressing cells are colabeled with BrdU. In contrast, 2 weeks after BrdU injection, when quiescent neural stem cells that have a long cell-cycle time can be labeled with BrdU, 35.9% ± 4.3% of Pax6-expressing cells are labeled with BrdU, suggesting that Pax6 is expressed not only in transit-amplifying cells with a shorter cell cycle but also in quiescent neural stem cells. (C): Characteristics of Pax6-expressing cells estimated from immunostaining and BrdU labeling. With regard to Pax6-expressing cells, 40% are astrocytes, 17.5% are neural stem cells, 2.5% are GFAP-positive progenitors, and the remaining are PSA-NCAM-expressing late progenitors (BrdU-positive) and PSA-NCAM-expressing neuroblasts (BrdU-negative). (D): Schematic illustration of stages and representative markers of hippocampal neurogenesis and expression of Pax6. Pax6 functions to maintain neural stem/early progenitor cells in hippocampal neurogenesis. Abbreviations: BrdU, 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; GCL, granule cell layer; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; min, minutes; ML, molecular layer; PSA-NCAM, polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule; SGZ, subgranular zone.

 
Expression of Pax6 is induced in the hippocampus in response to brain injury [130] as a result of cell proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells caused by the lesion. Our group has shown that cell proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells and subsequent production of neurons are considerably reduced in the hippocampus of Pax6-haploinsufficient rats [124] and mice [131]. There seems to be an accelerated transition to neurogenic stages, since more cells coexpress GFAP and PSA-NCAM in rSey2/+ [124]. Eventually, the granule cell layer in the DG becomes thinner as time passes, although the gross anatomy of the brain is not dramatically different from that of the WT.

FABP7, an important downstream molecule of Pax6 [87], is also expressed in cells with a radial-glial phenotype in the hippocampus [88]. Interestingly, Pax6 seems to regulate the expression of Fabp7 in the SGZ in both the mouse and rat (M.M., unpublished data). In addition, we have shown that FABP7 indeed functions to keep neural stem/progenitor cells proliferating during hippocampal neurogenesis [132]. Thus, regulation of Fabp7 by Pax6 is fundamental in both embryonic and hippocampal neurogenesis.

The SVZ in the lateral ventricle is another niche for neurogenesis. Astrocytes in the SVZ produce neural progenitors that transiently divide and migrate toward the olfactory bulb, where they become mature neurons within several weeks (reviewed by Alvarez-Buylla and Lim [133] and Lledo and Saghatelyan [134]). During these long-lasting processes, strong expression of Pax6 persists in migrating immature neurons as well as in mature neurons with heterogeneous character. Pax6 function is required for specification of dopaminergic periglomerular cells and for GABAergic granule cells in the superficial layer [126, 127]. The number of dopaminergic periglomerular cells are increased by overexpression of Pax6 in the adult neuronal progenitors [126] and decreased in Pax6 heterozygous mutant mice [127, 135]. These data suggest that a proper dose of Pax6 is essential for differentiation and/or maintenance of various olfactory interneurons [136]. How Pax6 modulates proliferation or differentiation, through the regulation of different downstream effectors, during neurogenesis in the hippocampal SGZ and the lateral ventricular SVZ would be an issue of great interest in future studies.

In closing this section, we would like to point out, as also mentioned in the review by Hevner et al. [34], that there are considerable molecular similarities between embryonic and adult neurogenesis, in both of which Pax6 functions in the early step to balance proliferation of neural stem cells and differentiation into neurons.


    CONCLUSION
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
As Scott Gilbert cited various findings related to Pax6 in his great textbook Developmental Biology [137], this transcription factor is one of the most intensively studied developmental molecules. We have recently reported that Pax6 is required for normal interkinetic nuclear movement (INM) in cortical neuroepithelial cells [138]. This may lead to a breakthrough in our understanding of the molecular machinery of INM, which was discovered nearly a half century ago [139]. Enhancer elements of Pax6 are also complex but interesting [66, 140], although elements for activity in postnatal neural stem/progenitor cells are not yet known. Finally, understanding how Pax6 switches on different target genes from neurogenesis to gliogenesis is a challenging issue for the future.


    DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Drs. Ron McKay, Wieland Huttner, Robert Hevner, François Guillemot, Hideyuki Okano, Tetsuya Taga, Ryoichiro Kageyama, Kazunori Nakajima, and Tatsunori Hisatsune for thoughtful discussions at the Neurogenesis 2007 meeting held in Tokyo and organized by Dr. Tatsunori Hisatsune and N.O. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas "Molecular Brain Science" from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency, and the Global Center of Excellence program of MEXT.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Author contributions: N.O.: conception and design, financial support, administrative support, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript; H.S.: collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing; K.N.-T.: data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing; M.M.: collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Role of Pax6 in...
 Molecular Mechanisms Underlying...
 Pax6 in Postnatal Neurogenesis
 Conclusion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Walther C, Gruss P. Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. Development 1991;113:1435–1449.[Abstract]

  2. Ton CC, Hirvonen H, Miwa H et al. Positional cloning and characterization of a paired box- and homeobox-containing gene from the aniridia region. Cell 1991;67:1059–1074.[CrossRef][Medline]

  3. Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BL et al. Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature 1991;354:522–525.[CrossRef][Medline]

  4. Hanson I, Van Heyningen V. Pax6: More than meets the eye. Trends Genet 1995;11:268–272.[CrossRef][Medline]

  5. Kioussi C, O'Connell S, St-Onge L et al. Pax6 is essential for establishing ventral-dorsal cell boundaries in pituitary gland development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:14378–14382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Dohrmann C, Gruss P, Lemaire L. Pax genes and the differentiation of hormone-producing endocrine cells in the pancreas. Mech Dev 2000;92:47–54.[CrossRef][Medline]

  7. Osumi N. The role of Pax6 in brain patterning. Tohoku J Exp Med 2001;193:163–174.[CrossRef][Medline]

  8. Simpson TI, Price DJ. Pax6; a pleiotropic player in development. Bioessays 2002;24:1041–1051.[CrossRef][Medline]

  9. Manuel M, Price DJ. Role of Pax6 in forebrain regionalization. Brain Res Bull 2005;66:387–393.[CrossRef][Medline]

  10. Matsuo T, Osumi-Yamashita N, Noji S et al. A mutation in the Pax-6 gene in rat small eye is associated with impaired migration of midbrain crest cells. Nat Genet 1993;3:299–304.[CrossRef][Medline]

  11. Osumi N, Hirota A, Ohuchi H et al. Pax-6 is involved in the specification of hindbrain motor neuron subtype. Development 1997;124:2961–2972.[Abstract]

  12. Hanson IM, Fletcher JM, Jordan T et al. Mutations at the PAX6 locus are found in heterogeneous anterior segment malformations including Peters' anomaly. Nat Genet 1994;6:168–173.[CrossRef][Medline]

  13. Dangata YY, Findlater GS, Dhillon B et al. Morphometric study of the optic nerve of adult normal mice and mice heterozygous for the Small eye mutation (Sey/+). J Anat 1994;185:627–635.[Medline]

  14. Singh S, Mishra R, Arango NA et al. Iris hypoplasia in mice that lack the alternatively spliced Pax6(5a) isoform. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:6812–6815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Kanakubo S, Nomura T, Yamamura K et al. Abnormal migration and distribution of neural crest cells in Pax6 heterozygous mutant eye, a model for human eye diseases. Genes Cells 2006;11:919–933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Hogan BL, Horsburgh G, Cohen J et al. Small eyes (Sey): A homozygous lethal mutation on chromosome 2 which affects the differentiation of both lens and nasal placodes in the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1986;97:95–110.[Medline]

  17. Fujiwara M, Uchida T, Osumi-Yamashita N et al. Uchida rat (rSey): A new mutant rat with craniofacial abnormalities resembling those of the mouse Sey mutant. Differentiation 1994;57:31–38.[CrossRef][Medline]

  18. Jones L, Lopez-Bendito G, Gruss P et al. Pax6 is required for the normal development of the forebrain axonal connections. Development 2002;129:5041–5052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Numayama-Tsuruta K, Arai Y, Osumi N. In: Esashi M, Ishi K, Ohuchi N et al, eds. Future Medical Engineering Based on Bionanotechnology: Proceedings of the Final Symposium of the Tohoku University 21st Century Center of Excellence Program. The rat Small eye homozygote (rSey2/rSey2) can be regarded as a Pax6 null mutant. London: Imperial College Press, 2007:151-161.

  20. Inoue T, Nakamura S, Osumi N. Fate mapping of the mouse prosencephalic neural plate. Dev Biol 2000;219:373–383.[CrossRef][Medline]

  21. Soriano E, Del Rio JA. The cells of Cajal-Retzius: Still a mystery one century after. Neuron 2005;46:389–394.[CrossRef][Medline]

  22. Marín O, Rubenstein JL. A long, remarkable journey: Tangential migration in the telencephalon. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2:780–790.[Medline]

  23. Flames N, Marin O. Developmental mechanisms underlying the generation of cortical interneuron diversity. Neuron 2005;46:377–381.[CrossRef][Medline]

  24. Hirata T, Nomura T, Takagi Y et al. Mosaic development of the olfactory cortex with Pax6-dependent and -independent components. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 2002;136:17–26.[Medline]

  25. Campbell K, Götz M. Radial glia: Multi-purpose cells for vertebrate brain development. Trends Neurosci 2002;25:235–238.[CrossRef][Medline]

  26. Kriegstein AR, Götz M. Radial glia diversity: A matter of cell fate. Glia 2003;43:37–43.[CrossRef][Medline]

  27. Williams BP, Price J. Evidence for multiple precursor cell types in the embryonic rat cerebral cortex. Neuron 1995;14:1181–1188.[CrossRef][Medline]

  28. Malatesta P, Hartfuss E, Götz M. Isolation of radial glial cells by fluorescent-activated cell sorting reveals a neuronal lineage. Development 2000;127:5253–5263.[Abstract]

  29. Götz M, Huttner WB. The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005;6:777–788.[CrossRef][Medline]

  30. Huttner WB, Kosodo Y. Symmetric versus asymmetric cell division during neurogenesis in the developing vertebrate central nervous system. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005;17:648–657.[CrossRef][Medline]

  31. Noctor SC, Martinez-Cerdeno V, Ivic L et al. Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:136–144.[CrossRef][Medline]

  32. Haubensak W, Attardo A, Denk W et al. Neurons arise in the basal neuroepithelium of the early mammalian telencephalon: A major site of neurogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:3196–3201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  33. Miyata T, Kawaguchi A, Saito K et al. Asymmetric production of surface-dividing and non-surface-dividing cortical progenitor cells. Development 2004;131:3133–3145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  34. Hevner RF, Hodge RD, Daza RA et al. Transcription factors in glutamatergic neurogenesis: Conserved programs in neocortex, cerebellum, and adult hippocampus. Neurosci Res 2006;55:223–233.[CrossRef][Medline]

  35. Englund C, Fink A, Lau C et al. Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. J Neurosci 2005;25:247–251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  36. Shimamura K, Martinez S, Puelles L et al. Patterns of gene expression in the neural plate and neural tube subdivide the embryonic forebrain into transverse and longitudinal domains. Dev Neurosci 1997;19:88–96.[Medline]

  37. Wilson SW, Rubenstein JL. Induction and dorsoventral patterning of the telencephalon. Neuron 2000;28:641–651.[CrossRef][Medline]

  38. O'Leary DD, Nakagawa Y. Patterning centers, regulatory genes and extrinsic mechanisms controlling arealization of the neocortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2002;12:14–25.[CrossRef][Medline]

  39. Bertrand N, Castro DS, Guillemot F. Proneural genes and the specification of neural cell types. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3:517–530.[CrossRef][Medline]

  40. Scardigli R, Baumer N, Gruss P et al. Direct and concentration-dependent regulation of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 by Pax6. Development 2003;130:3269–3281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  41. Miyata T, Maeda T, Lee JE. NeuroD is required for differentiation of the granule cells in the cerebellum and hippocampus. Genes Dev 1999;13:1647–1652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  42. Liu M, Pleasure SJ, Collins AE et al. Loss of BETA2/NeuroD leads to malformation of the dentate gyrus and epilepsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:865–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  43. Schmahl W, Knoedlseder M, Favor J et al. Defects of neuronal migration and the pathogenesis of cortical malformations are associated with Small eye (Sey) in the mouse, a point mutation at the Pax-6-locus. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1993;86:126–135.[CrossRef][Medline]

  44. Stoykova A, Fritsch R, Walther C et al. Forebrain patterning defects in Small eye mutant mice. Development 1996;122:3453–3465.[Abstract]

  45. Caric D, Gooday D, Hill RE et al. Determination of the migratory capacity of embryonic cortical cells lacking the transcription factor Pax-6. Development 1997;124:5087–5096.[Abstract]

  46. Warren N, Caric D, Pratt T et al. The transcription factor, Pax6, is required for cell proliferation and differentiation in the developing cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1999;9:627–635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  47. Fukuda T, Kawano H, Osumi N et al. Histogenesis of the cerebral cortex in rat fetuses with a mutation in the Pax-6 gene. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 2000;120:65–75.[CrossRef][Medline]

  48. Estivill-Torrus G, Pearson H, van Heyningen V et al. Pax6 is required to regulate the cell cycle and the rate of progression from symmetrical to asymmetrical division in mammalian cortical progenitors. Development 2002;129:455–466.[Medline]

  49. Götz M, Stoykova A, Gruss P. Pax6 controls radial glia differentiation in the cerebral cortex. Neuron 1998;21:1031–1044.[CrossRef][Medline]

  50. Heins N, Malatesta P, Cecconi F et al. Glial cells generate neurons: The role of the transcription factor Pax6. Nat Neurosci 2002;5:308–315.[CrossRef][Medline]

  51. Quinn JC, Molinek M, Martynoga BS et al. Pax6 controls cerebral cortical cell number by regulating exit from the cell cycle and specifies cortical cell identity by a cell autonomous mechanism. Dev Biol 2007;302:50–65.[CrossRef][Medline]

  52. Philips GT, Stair CN, Young Lee H et al. Precocious retinal neurons: Pax6 controls timing of differentiation and determination of cell type. Dev Biol 2005;279:308–321.[CrossRef][Medline]

  53. Xu S, Sunderland ME, Coles BL et al. The proliferation and expansion of retinal stem cells require functional Pax6. Dev Biol 2007;304:713–721.[CrossRef][Medline]

  54. Duparc RH, Abdouh M, David J et al. Pax6 controls the proliferation rate of neuroepithelial progenitors from the mouse optic vesicle. Dev Biol 2007;301:374–387.[CrossRef][Medline]

  55. Epstein J, Cai J, Glaser T et al. Identification of a Pax paired domain recognition sequence and evidence for DNA-dependent conformational changes. J Biol Chem 1994;269:8355–8361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  56. Czerny T, Busslinger M. DNA-binding and transactivation properties of Pax-6: Three amino acids in the paired domain are responsible for the different sequence recognition of Pax-6 and BSAP (Pax-5). Mol Cell Biol 1995;15:2858–2871.[Abstract]

  57. Jun S, Desplan C. Cooperative interactions between paired domain and homeodomain. Development 1996;122:2639–2650.[Abstract]

  58. Tang HK, Singh S, Saunders GF. Dissection of the transactivation function of the transcription factor encoded by the eye developmental gene PAX6. J Biol Chem 1998;273:7210–7221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  59. Epstein JA, Glaser T, Cai J et al. Two independent and interactive DNA-binding subdomains of the Pax6 paired domain are regulated by alternative splicing. Genes Dev 1994;8:2022–2034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  60. Pinson J, Mason JO, Simpson TI et al. Regulation of the Pax6: Pax6(5a) mRNA ratio in the developing mammalian brain. BMC Dev Biol 2005;5:13.[CrossRef][Medline]

  61. Kammandel B, Chowdhury K, Stoykova A et al. Distinct cis-essential modules direct the time-space pattern of the Pax6 gene activity. Dev Biol 1999;205:79–97.[CrossRef][Medline]

  62. Kim J, Lauderdale JD. Analysis of Pax6 expression using a BAC transgene reveals the presence of a paired-less isoform of Pax6 in the eye and olfactory bulb. Dev Biol 2006;292:486–505.[CrossRef][Medline]

  63. Anderson TR, Hedlund E, Carpenter EM. Differential Pax6 promoter activity and transcript expression during forebrain development. Mech Dev 2002;114:171–175.[CrossRef][Medline]

  64. Kim J, Lauderdale JD. Overexpression of pairedless Pax6 in the retina disrupts corneal development and affects lens cell survival. Dev Biol 2008;313:434–454.[CrossRef][Medline]

  65. Haubst N, Berger J, Radjendirane V et al. Molecular dissection of Pax6 function: The specific roles of the paired domain and homeodomain in brain development. Development 2004;131:6131–6140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  66. Morgan R. Conservation of sequence and function in the Pax6 regulatory elements. Trends Genet 2004;20:283–287.[CrossRef][Medline]

  67. Aota S, Nakajima N, Sakamoto R et al. Pax6 autoregulation mediated by direct interaction of Pax6 protein with the head surface ectoderm-specific enhancer of the mouse Pax6 gene. Dev Biol 2003;257:1–13.[CrossRef][Medline]

  68. Manuel M, Georgala PA, Carr CB et al. Controlled overexpression of Pax6 in vivo negatively autoregulates the Pax6 locus, causing cell-autonomous defects of late cortical progenitor proliferation with little effect on cortical arealization. Development 2007;134:545–555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  69. Berger J, Berger S, Tuoc TC et al. Conditional activation of Pax6 in the developing cortex of transgenic mice causes progenitor apoptosis. Development 2007;134:1311–1322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  70. Cvekl A, Yang Y, Chauhan BK et al. Regulation of gene expression by Pax6 in ocular cells: A case of tissue-preferred expression of crystallins in lens. Int J Dev Biol 2004;48:829–844.[CrossRef][Medline]

  71. Kondoh H, Uchikawa M, Kamachi Y. Interplay of Pax6 and SOX2 in lens development as a paradigm of genetic switch mechanisms for cell differentiation. Int J Dev Biol 2004;48:819–827.[CrossRef][Medline]

  72. Kamachi Y, Uchikawa M, Tanouchi A et al. Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development. Genes Dev 2001;15:1272–1286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  73. Ritz-Laser B, Estreicher A, Klages N et al. Pax-6 and Cdx-2/3 interact to activate glucagon gene expression on the G1 control element. J Biol Chem 1999;274:4124–4132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  74. Planque N, Leconte L, Coquelle FM et al. Interaction of Maf transcription factors with Pax-6 results in synergistic activation of the glucagon promoter. J Biol Chem 2001;276:35751–35760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  75. Wood HB, Episkopou V. Comparative expression of the mouse Sox1, Sox2 and Sox3 genes from pre-gastrulation to early somite stages. Mech Dev 1999;86:197–201.[CrossRef][Medline]

  76. Yuan H, Corbi N, Basilico C et al. Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3. Genes Dev 1995;9:2635–2645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  77. Josephson R, Muller T, Pickel J et al. POU transcription factors control expression of CNS stem cell-specific genes. Development 1998;125:3087–3100.[Abstract]

  78. Ambrosetti DC, Scholer HR, Dailey L et al. Modulation of the activity of multiple transcriptional activation domains by the DNA binding domains mediates the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3 on the fibroblast growth factor-4 enhancer. J Biol Chem 2000;275:23387–23397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  79. Tanaka S, Kamachi Y, Tanouchi A et al. Interplay of SOX and POU factors in regulation of the Nestin gene in neural primordial cells. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:8834–8846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  80. Monaghan AP, Grau E, Bock D et al. The mouse homolog of the orphan nuclear receptor tailless is expressed in the developing forebrain. Development 1995;121:839–853.[Abstract]

  81. Stenman J, Yu RT, Evans RM et al. Tlx and Pax6 co-operate genetically to establish the pallio-subpallial boundary in the embryonic mouse telencephalon. Development 2003;130:1113–1122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  82. Schuurmans C, Armant O, Nieto M et al. Sequential phases of cortical specification involve Neurogenin-dependent and -independent pathways. EMBO J 2004;23:2892–2902.[CrossRef][Medline]

  83. Grocott T, Frost V, Maillard M et al. The MH1 domain of Smad3 interacts with Pax6 and represses autoregulation of the Pax6 P1 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:890–901.[Abstract/F