Stem Cells http://www.peprotech.com/
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online August 25, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2004-0371v1
2004-0371v2
23/10/1468    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, M. K.
Submitted on December 27, 2004
Accepted on August 11, 2005

Original Article

X-Inactivation Varies in hESC Lines

Lisa M. Hoffman 1, Lisa Hall 2, Jennifer L. Batten 1, Holly Young 1, Dheerja Pardasani 1, E. Edward Baetge 3, Jeanne Lawrence 2, Melissa K. Carpenter 1*

1 Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
2 Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
3 CyThera, Inc, San Diego, California

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mcarpenter{at}cytheraco.com.


   Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) derived from human blastocysts have an apparently unlimited proliferative capacity, and can differentiate into ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm. As such, hESC lines have enormous potential for use in cell replacement therapies. It must first be demonstrated, however, that hESCs maintain a stable karyotype and phenotype, and that gene expression is appropriately regulated. To date, different hESC lines exhibit similar patterns of expression of markers associated with pluripotent cells. However, the evaluation of epigenetic status of hESC lines has only recently been initiated. One example of epigenetic gene regulation is dosage compensation of the X chromosome in mammalian females. This is achieved through an epigenetic event referred to as X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), an event initiated upon cellular differentiation. We provide the first evidence that undifferentiated hESC lines exhibit different patterns of XCI.

Key Words. human embryonic stem cells, epigenesis, X-chromosome inactivation, differentiation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
X. Sun, X. Long, Y. Yin, Y. Jiang, X. Chen, W. Liu, W. Zhang, H. Du, S. Li, Y. Zheng, et al.
Similar biological characteristics of human embryonic stem cell lines with normal and abnormal karyotypes
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2185 - 2193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Shen, Y. Matsuno, S. D. Fouse, N. Rao, S. Root, R. Xu, M. Pellegrini, A. D. Riggs, and G. Fan
X-inactivation in female human embryonic stem cells is in a nonrandom pattern and prone to epigenetic alterations
PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4709 - 4714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. S. Silva, R. K. Rowntree, S. Mekhoubad, and J. T. Lee
X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic fluidity in human embryonic stem cells
PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4820 - 4825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
C. S. Navara, J. D. Mich-Basso, C. J. Redinger, A. Ben-Yehudah, E. Jacoby, E. Kovkarova-Naumovski, M. Sukhwani, K. Orwig, N. Kaminski, C. A. Castro, et al.
Pedigreed Primate Embryonic Stem Cells Express Homogeneous Familial Gene Profiles
Stem Cells, November 1, 2007; 25(11): 2695 - 2704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. C. Chow, L. L. Hall, S. E. L. Baldry, N. P. Thorogood, J. B. Lawrence, and C. J. Brown
Inducible XIST-dependent X-chromosome inactivation in human somatic cells is reversible
PNAS, June 12, 2007; 104(24): 10104 - 10109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
C. Allegrucci and L.E. Young
Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 103 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Hellman and A. Chess
Gene Body-Specific Methylation on the Active X Chromosome
Science, February 23, 2007; 315(5815): 1141 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
M. A. Vickers, S. J. Canning, W. L. Craig, N. M. Masson, and I. J. Wilson
X Inactivation Patterns of Closely, but Not Distantly, Related Cells Are Highly Correlated: Little Evidence for Stem Cell Plasticity in Normal Females
Stem Cells, November 1, 2006; 24(11): 2398 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
M. S. Rao
One Successful Series Begets Another
Stem Cells, October 1, 2006; 24(10): 2160 - 2161.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. Bibikova, E. Chudin, B. Wu, L. Zhou, E. W. Garcia, Y. Liu, S. Shin, T. W. Plaia, J. M. Auerbach, D. E. Arking, et al.
Human embryonic stem cells have a unique epigenetic signature
Genome Res., September 1, 2006; 16(9): 1075 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
STEM CELLS THE ONCOLOGIST CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS
http://www.peprotech.com/
Copyright © 2005 by AlphaMed Press.