|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letter to the Editor |
1 CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Groupe d'Etude des Cellules d'Origine Médullaire (GECOM), Hématologie Biologique, Hôtel-Dieu, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mberger{at}chu-clermontferrand.fr.
| Abstract |
|---|
For most therapeutic strategies using Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC), the preliminary amplification is carried out in media containing fetal calf serum (FCS). The theoretical health risk of using a xenogenic serum, a recent practice for which we have limited data, cannot be underestimated, while amplification using human serum (HS) remains controversial. At present, the available information on multi-potentiality, self-renewal and transplantability does not permit the selection of FCS rather than HS. Cellular modifications observed during cell passage seem to indicate a gradual impairment of cells in relation to native MSC, suggesting the making of short cell cultures without necessarily trying to re-infuse a high number of MSC in patients. With this approach, the volume of HS required would remain limited. Whilst clinical studies have already started, many problems remain; such as evaluating the quality of the initial mesenchymal compartment and the biological properties of the cell suspension with FCS compared to those with HS, and depending on culture time.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Mannello and G. A. Tonti Concise Review: No Breakthroughs for Human Mesenchymal and Embryonic Stem Cell Culture: Conditioned Medium, Feeder Layer, or Feeder-Free; Medium with Fetal Calf Serum, Human Serum, or Enriched Plasma; Serum-Free, Serum Replacement Nonconditioned Medium, or Ad Hoc Formula? All That Glitters Is Not Gold! Stem Cells, July 1, 2007; 25(7): 1603 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| STEM CELLS | THE ONCOLOGIST | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |