HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: 2007-0691v1 26/5/1253    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints/Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, N. Articles by DiRenzo, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, N. Articles by DiRenzo, J.

TISSUE-SPECIFIC STEM CELLS

Reciprocal Intraepithelial Interactions Between TP63 and Hedgehog Signaling Regulate Quiescence and Activation of Progenitor Elaboration by Mammary Stem Cells

^aDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA;
^bDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
^cDepartment of Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA

Key Words. Mammary stem cells • Mammary progenitors • Quiescence • TP63 • Hedgehog • Gli3

Correspondence: James DiRenzo, Ph.D., Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Dartmouth Medical School, 7650 Remsen, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA. Telephone: 603-650-1794; Fax: 603-650-1129; e-mail: james.direnzo{at}dartmouth.edu

Received August 20, 2007; accepted for publication February 12, 2008.
First published online in STEM CELLS EXPRESS   February 21, 2008.



TP63 is required for preservation of epithelial regenerative stasis and regulates the activity of diverse genetic pathways; however, specific effector pathways are poorly understood. Data presented here indicate that reciprocal regulatory interactions between hedgehog signaling and TP63 mediate stage-specific effects on proliferation and clonigenicity of separable enriched mammary stem and progenitor fractions. Analysis of N-p63 and TA-p63 indicates segregated expression in mammary stem and progenitor fractions, respectively, demonstrating that differential TP63 promoter selection occurs during elaboration of mammary progenitors by mammary stem cells. This segregation underlies mammary progenitor-specific expression of Indian Hedgehog, identifying it as a binary transcriptional target of TP63. Hedgehog activation in vivo enhances elaboration of mammary progenitors and decreases label retention within mammary stem cell-enriched fractions, suggesting that hedgehog exerts a mitogenic effect on mammary stem cells. Hedgehog signaling promotes differential TP63 promoter usage via disruption of Gli3 or Gli3^R accumulation, and shRNA-mediated disruption of Gli3 expression was sufficient to alter TP63 promoter usage and enhance clonigenicity of mammary stem cells. Finally, hedgehog signaling is enhanced during pregnancy, where it contributes to expansion of the mammary progenitor compartment. These studies support a model in which hedgehog activates elaboration and differentiation of mammary progenitors via differential TP63 promoter selection and forfeiture of self-renewing capacity.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.-L. Asselin-Labat, F. Vaillant, M. Shackleton, T. Bouras, G.J. Lindeman, and J.E. Visvader Delineating the Epithelial Hierarchy in the Mouse Mammary Gland Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, November 19, 2008; (2008) sqb.2008.73.020v2. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. L. LaMarca and J. M. Rosen Hormones and Mammary Cell Fate--What Will I Become When I Grow Up? Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4317 - 4321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]